将靶向 RNA 测序作为软组织和骨肿瘤诊断工作流程的一部分,检测复发性和新型融合。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY Journal of Pathology Clinical Research Pub Date : 2024-05-13 DOI:10.1002/2056-4538.12376
Rafael Zago Baltazar, Sofie Claerhout, Sara Vander Borght, Lien Spans, Raphael Sciot, Patrick Schöffski, Daphne Hompes, Friedl Sinnaeve, Hazem Wafa, Marleen Renard, Mari FCM van den Hout, Astrid Vernemmen, Louis Libbrecht, An-Katrien De Roo, Filomena Mazzeo, Cédric van Marcke, Karen Deraedt, Claire Bourgain, Isabelle Vanden Bempt
{"title":"将靶向 RNA 测序作为软组织和骨肿瘤诊断工作流程的一部分,检测复发性和新型融合。","authors":"Rafael Zago Baltazar,&nbsp;Sofie Claerhout,&nbsp;Sara Vander Borght,&nbsp;Lien Spans,&nbsp;Raphael Sciot,&nbsp;Patrick Schöffski,&nbsp;Daphne Hompes,&nbsp;Friedl Sinnaeve,&nbsp;Hazem Wafa,&nbsp;Marleen Renard,&nbsp;Mari FCM van den Hout,&nbsp;Astrid Vernemmen,&nbsp;Louis Libbrecht,&nbsp;An-Katrien De Roo,&nbsp;Filomena Mazzeo,&nbsp;Cédric van Marcke,&nbsp;Karen Deraedt,&nbsp;Claire Bourgain,&nbsp;Isabelle Vanden Bempt","doi":"10.1002/2056-4538.12376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The identification of gene fusions has become an integral part of soft tissue and bone tumour diagnosis. We investigated the added value of targeted RNA-based sequencing (targeted RNA-seq, Archer FusionPlex) to our current molecular diagnostic workflow of these tumours, which is based on fluorescence <i>in situ</i> hybridisation (FISH) for the detection of gene fusions using 25 probes. In a series of 131 diagnostic samples targeted RNA-seq identified a gene fusion, <i>BCOR</i> internal tandem duplication or <i>ALK</i> deletion in 47 cases (35.9%). For 74 cases, encompassing 137 FISH analyses, concordance between FISH and targeted RNA-seq was evaluated. A positive or negative FISH result was confirmed by targeted RNA-seq in 27 out of 49 (55.1%) and 81 out of 88 (92.0%) analyses, respectively. While negative concordance was high, targeted RNA-seq identified a canonical gene fusion in seven cases despite a negative FISH result. The 22 discordant FISH-positive analyses showed a lower percentage of rearrangement-positive nuclei (range 15–41%) compared to the concordant FISH-positive analyses (&gt;41% of nuclei in 88.9% of cases). Six FISH analyses (in four cases) were finally considered false positive based on histological and targeted RNA-seq findings. For the <i>EWSR1</i> FISH probe, we observed a gene-dependent disparity (<i>p</i> = 0.0020), with 8 out of 35 cases showing a discordance between FISH and targeted RNA-seq (22.9%). This study demonstrates an added value of targeted RNA-seq to our current diagnostic workflow of soft tissue and bone tumours in 19 out of 131 cases (14.5%), which we categorised as altered diagnosis (3 cases), added precision (6 cases), or augmented spectrum (10 cases). In the latter subgroup, four novel fusion transcripts were found for which the clinical relevance remains unclear: <i>NAB2::NCOA2</i>, <i>YAP1::NUTM2B</i>, <i>HSPA8::BRAF</i>, and <i>PDE2A::PLAG1</i>. Overall, targeted RNA-seq has proven extremely valuable in the diagnostic workflow of soft tissue and bone tumours.</p>","PeriodicalId":48612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research","volume":"10 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/2056-4538.12376","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recurrent and novel fusions detected by targeted RNA sequencing as part of the diagnostic workflow of soft tissue and bone tumours\",\"authors\":\"Rafael Zago Baltazar,&nbsp;Sofie Claerhout,&nbsp;Sara Vander Borght,&nbsp;Lien Spans,&nbsp;Raphael Sciot,&nbsp;Patrick Schöffski,&nbsp;Daphne Hompes,&nbsp;Friedl Sinnaeve,&nbsp;Hazem Wafa,&nbsp;Marleen Renard,&nbsp;Mari FCM van den Hout,&nbsp;Astrid Vernemmen,&nbsp;Louis Libbrecht,&nbsp;An-Katrien De Roo,&nbsp;Filomena Mazzeo,&nbsp;Cédric van Marcke,&nbsp;Karen Deraedt,&nbsp;Claire Bourgain,&nbsp;Isabelle Vanden Bempt\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/2056-4538.12376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The identification of gene fusions has become an integral part of soft tissue and bone tumour diagnosis. We investigated the added value of targeted RNA-based sequencing (targeted RNA-seq, Archer FusionPlex) to our current molecular diagnostic workflow of these tumours, which is based on fluorescence <i>in situ</i> hybridisation (FISH) for the detection of gene fusions using 25 probes. In a series of 131 diagnostic samples targeted RNA-seq identified a gene fusion, <i>BCOR</i> internal tandem duplication or <i>ALK</i> deletion in 47 cases (35.9%). For 74 cases, encompassing 137 FISH analyses, concordance between FISH and targeted RNA-seq was evaluated. A positive or negative FISH result was confirmed by targeted RNA-seq in 27 out of 49 (55.1%) and 81 out of 88 (92.0%) analyses, respectively. While negative concordance was high, targeted RNA-seq identified a canonical gene fusion in seven cases despite a negative FISH result. The 22 discordant FISH-positive analyses showed a lower percentage of rearrangement-positive nuclei (range 15–41%) compared to the concordant FISH-positive analyses (&gt;41% of nuclei in 88.9% of cases). Six FISH analyses (in four cases) were finally considered false positive based on histological and targeted RNA-seq findings. For the <i>EWSR1</i> FISH probe, we observed a gene-dependent disparity (<i>p</i> = 0.0020), with 8 out of 35 cases showing a discordance between FISH and targeted RNA-seq (22.9%). This study demonstrates an added value of targeted RNA-seq to our current diagnostic workflow of soft tissue and bone tumours in 19 out of 131 cases (14.5%), which we categorised as altered diagnosis (3 cases), added precision (6 cases), or augmented spectrum (10 cases). In the latter subgroup, four novel fusion transcripts were found for which the clinical relevance remains unclear: <i>NAB2::NCOA2</i>, <i>YAP1::NUTM2B</i>, <i>HSPA8::BRAF</i>, and <i>PDE2A::PLAG1</i>. Overall, targeted RNA-seq has proven extremely valuable in the diagnostic workflow of soft tissue and bone tumours.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/2056-4538.12376\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2056-4538.12376\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2056-4538.12376","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基因融合的鉴定已成为软组织和骨肿瘤诊断不可或缺的一部分。我们研究了基于 RNA 的靶向测序(靶向 RNA-seq,Archer FusionPlex)对目前这些肿瘤分子诊断工作流程的附加价值,该流程基于荧光原位杂交(FISH),使用 25 个探针检测基因融合。在一系列 131 个诊断样本中,有 47 个病例(35.9%)的靶向 RNA-seq 发现了基因融合、BCOR 内部串联重复或 ALK 缺失。在 74 个病例(包括 137 项 FISH 分析)中,对 FISH 和靶向 RNA-seq 的一致性进行了评估。在 49 次分析中有 27 次(55.1%)和 88 次分析中有 81 次(92.0%)的 FISH 阳性或阴性结果分别得到了靶向 RNA-seq 的证实。虽然阴性结果的一致性很高,但在 7 个病例中,尽管 FISH 结果为阴性,但靶向 RNA-seq 还是发现了典型基因融合。与一致的 FISH 阳性分析(在 88.9% 的病例中,>41% 的核仁)相比,22 例不一致的 FISH 阳性分析中重排阳性核仁的比例较低(范围为 15-41%)。根据组织学和靶向 RNA-seq 研究结果,有 6 项 FISH 分析(4 例)最终被认为是假阳性。对于 EWSR1 FISH 探针,我们观察到了基因依赖性差异(p = 0.0020),35 个病例中有 8 个病例的 FISH 和靶向 RNA-seq 结果不一致(22.9%)。这项研究表明,在 131 个病例中,有 19 个病例(14.5%)的靶向 RNA-seq 为我们目前的软组织和骨肿瘤诊断工作流程带来了附加值,我们将其归类为改变诊断(3 个病例)、提高精确度(6 个病例)或增强谱系(10 个病例)。在后一亚组中,我们发现了四个新的融合转录本,其临床意义尚不清楚:NAB2::NCOA2、YAP1::NUTM2B、HSPA8::BRAF 和 PDE2A::PLAG1。总之,靶向 RNA-seq 已被证明在软组织和骨肿瘤的诊断流程中极具价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Recurrent and novel fusions detected by targeted RNA sequencing as part of the diagnostic workflow of soft tissue and bone tumours

The identification of gene fusions has become an integral part of soft tissue and bone tumour diagnosis. We investigated the added value of targeted RNA-based sequencing (targeted RNA-seq, Archer FusionPlex) to our current molecular diagnostic workflow of these tumours, which is based on fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) for the detection of gene fusions using 25 probes. In a series of 131 diagnostic samples targeted RNA-seq identified a gene fusion, BCOR internal tandem duplication or ALK deletion in 47 cases (35.9%). For 74 cases, encompassing 137 FISH analyses, concordance between FISH and targeted RNA-seq was evaluated. A positive or negative FISH result was confirmed by targeted RNA-seq in 27 out of 49 (55.1%) and 81 out of 88 (92.0%) analyses, respectively. While negative concordance was high, targeted RNA-seq identified a canonical gene fusion in seven cases despite a negative FISH result. The 22 discordant FISH-positive analyses showed a lower percentage of rearrangement-positive nuclei (range 15–41%) compared to the concordant FISH-positive analyses (>41% of nuclei in 88.9% of cases). Six FISH analyses (in four cases) were finally considered false positive based on histological and targeted RNA-seq findings. For the EWSR1 FISH probe, we observed a gene-dependent disparity (p = 0.0020), with 8 out of 35 cases showing a discordance between FISH and targeted RNA-seq (22.9%). This study demonstrates an added value of targeted RNA-seq to our current diagnostic workflow of soft tissue and bone tumours in 19 out of 131 cases (14.5%), which we categorised as altered diagnosis (3 cases), added precision (6 cases), or augmented spectrum (10 cases). In the latter subgroup, four novel fusion transcripts were found for which the clinical relevance remains unclear: NAB2::NCOA2, YAP1::NUTM2B, HSPA8::BRAF, and PDE2A::PLAG1. Overall, targeted RNA-seq has proven extremely valuable in the diagnostic workflow of soft tissue and bone tumours.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pathology Clinical Research
Journal of Pathology Clinical Research Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
47
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research and The Journal of Pathology serve as translational bridges between basic biomedical science and clinical medicine with particular emphasis on, but not restricted to, tissue based studies. The focus of The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research is the publication of studies that illuminate the clinical relevance of research in the broad area of the study of disease. Appropriately powered and validated studies with novel diagnostic, prognostic and predictive significance, and biomarker discover and validation, will be welcomed. Studies with a predominantly mechanistic basis will be more appropriate for the companion Journal of Pathology.
期刊最新文献
High chromosomal instability is associated with higher 10-year risks of recurrence for hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer patients: clinical evidence from a large-scale, multiple-site, retrospective study Large multimodal model-based standardisation of pathology reports with confidence and its prognostic significance Clinicopathological and epigenetic differences between primary neuroendocrine tumors and neuroendocrine metastases in the ovary Large language models as a diagnostic support tool in neuropathology Homologous recombination deficiency score is an independent prognostic factor in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1