早期学习者根据记忆书写字母时使用的认知策略。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Australian Occupational Therapy Journal Pub Date : 2024-05-13 DOI:10.1111/1440-1630.12956
Kathryn Mathwin, Christine Chapparo, Julianne Challita
{"title":"早期学习者根据记忆书写字母时使用的认知策略。","authors":"Kathryn Mathwin,&nbsp;Christine Chapparo,&nbsp;Julianne Challita","doi":"10.1111/1440-1630.12956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Occupational therapy handwriting studies have shown cognitive instructional techniques are effective methods to assist beginning or challenged handwriters. However, information about how children's cognitive (thinking) skills impact their handwriting development is scarce. This study examined the cognitive strategy efficiency of early learners while writing the alphabet-letters from memory.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Participants included 408 mainstream children in their first two years of formal schooling (Year 1 and Year 2). Children were asked to write the 26-lowercase alphabet-letters from memory. Data were collected using alphabet-letters generated by the children and observation of their cognitive strategy use while writing. The measurement tool employed was the Perceive, Recall, Plan, and Perform (PRPP) System of Task Analysis (Stage Two).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The results found that Year 1 and Year 2 children had difficulties applying cognitive strategies across all four PRPP quadrants while writing the lowercase alphabet-letters from memory. Application of the cognitive strategies from the Plan and Recall quadrants showed the most inefficiencies. The lowest PRPP subquadrant scores were observed in <i>Evaluating, Recall Facts, Sensing</i>, and <i>Programming</i>. Except for the <i>Attending</i> subquadrant and the descriptor ‘Regulates’, Year 2 children were significantly better than Year 1 children at applying cognitive strategies from all other PRPP quadrants and subquadrants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The findings provide beginning evidence that efficient use of cognitive strategies from all four PRPP quadrants is important for children achieving proficiency in accurate and automatic alphabet-letter-writing skills. Recommendations for occupational therapy handwriting assessment and intervention are provided.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Plain Language Summary</h3>\n \n <p>Research suggests that occupational therapists can best help children with handwriting difficulties by using a cognitive approach. This approach involves instructing children how to form letters correctly, encouraging self-evaluation, and providing opportunities to practice handwriting. However, the cognitive (thinking) skills required for children to write alphabet-letters accurately are not well understood. To investigate this, a study was conducted on 408 mainstream children in their first two years of formal schooling (Year 1 and Year 2). The study examined how accurately the children could write lowercase alphabet-letters from memory and which cognitive skills they used to do so. The cognitive skills investigated were related to attention, perception, recalling, planning, and performing. The assumption tested was that mistakes in correctly writing alphabet-letters could be attributed to difficulties in using these cognitive skills effectively. The study found that Year 1 and Year 2 children made errors in over half of the 26-lowercase alphabet-letters they wrote. The cognitive skills, which scored the lowest were children's ability to evaluate their writing, recall how and where to write letters, gather information from their vision, and think carefully to ensure accuracy while writing. This implied that these thinking skills had the most impact on the children's ability to write alphabet-letters correctly. More research is needed to confirm these findings and determine the reliability of the tool used in this study to measure the children's thinking skills.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55418,"journal":{"name":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1440-1630.12956","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cognitive strategies utilised by early learners when writing alphabet-letters from memory\",\"authors\":\"Kathryn Mathwin,&nbsp;Christine Chapparo,&nbsp;Julianne Challita\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1440-1630.12956\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Occupational therapy handwriting studies have shown cognitive instructional techniques are effective methods to assist beginning or challenged handwriters. However, information about how children's cognitive (thinking) skills impact their handwriting development is scarce. This study examined the cognitive strategy efficiency of early learners while writing the alphabet-letters from memory.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Participants included 408 mainstream children in their first two years of formal schooling (Year 1 and Year 2). Children were asked to write the 26-lowercase alphabet-letters from memory. Data were collected using alphabet-letters generated by the children and observation of their cognitive strategy use while writing. The measurement tool employed was the Perceive, Recall, Plan, and Perform (PRPP) System of Task Analysis (Stage Two).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The results found that Year 1 and Year 2 children had difficulties applying cognitive strategies across all four PRPP quadrants while writing the lowercase alphabet-letters from memory. Application of the cognitive strategies from the Plan and Recall quadrants showed the most inefficiencies. The lowest PRPP subquadrant scores were observed in <i>Evaluating, Recall Facts, Sensing</i>, and <i>Programming</i>. Except for the <i>Attending</i> subquadrant and the descriptor ‘Regulates’, Year 2 children were significantly better than Year 1 children at applying cognitive strategies from all other PRPP quadrants and subquadrants.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The findings provide beginning evidence that efficient use of cognitive strategies from all four PRPP quadrants is important for children achieving proficiency in accurate and automatic alphabet-letter-writing skills. Recommendations for occupational therapy handwriting assessment and intervention are provided.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Plain Language Summary</h3>\\n \\n <p>Research suggests that occupational therapists can best help children with handwriting difficulties by using a cognitive approach. This approach involves instructing children how to form letters correctly, encouraging self-evaluation, and providing opportunities to practice handwriting. However, the cognitive (thinking) skills required for children to write alphabet-letters accurately are not well understood. To investigate this, a study was conducted on 408 mainstream children in their first two years of formal schooling (Year 1 and Year 2). The study examined how accurately the children could write lowercase alphabet-letters from memory and which cognitive skills they used to do so. The cognitive skills investigated were related to attention, perception, recalling, planning, and performing. The assumption tested was that mistakes in correctly writing alphabet-letters could be attributed to difficulties in using these cognitive skills effectively. The study found that Year 1 and Year 2 children made errors in over half of the 26-lowercase alphabet-letters they wrote. The cognitive skills, which scored the lowest were children's ability to evaluate their writing, recall how and where to write letters, gather information from their vision, and think carefully to ensure accuracy while writing. This implied that these thinking skills had the most impact on the children's ability to write alphabet-letters correctly. More research is needed to confirm these findings and determine the reliability of the tool used in this study to measure the children's thinking skills.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1440-1630.12956\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1630.12956\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1630.12956","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍:职业治疗手写研究表明,认知教学技巧是帮助初学者或有困难的手写者的有效方法。然而,有关儿童的认知(思维)技能如何影响其手写发展的信息却很少。本研究考察了早期学习者根据记忆书写字母表字母时的认知策略效率:研究对象包括 408 名接受正规教育头两年(一年级和二年级)的主流儿童。要求儿童凭记忆书写 26 个小写英文字母。数据收集采用了由儿童生成的字母表,并观察了他们在书写时认知策略的使用情况。采用的测量工具是感知、回忆、计划和执行(PRPP)任务分析系统(第二阶段):结果发现,一年级和二年级的儿童在凭记忆书写小写字母时,在运用 PRPP 四个象限的认知策略方面都存在困难。计划和回忆象限的认知策略应用效率最差。评估、回忆事实、感知和计划的 PRPP 子象限得分最低。除 "关注 "子象限和 "调节 "描述外,二年级儿童在运用 PRPP 所有其他象限和子象限的认知策略方面明显优于一年级儿童:研究结果提供了初步证据,表明有效运用 PRPP 全部四个象限的认知策略对于儿童熟练掌握准确、自动的字母-字母书写技能非常重要。本文还提供了职业治疗手写评估和干预建议:研究表明,职业治疗师可以通过认知方法为有手写困难的儿童提供最佳帮助。这种方法包括指导儿童如何正确书写字母,鼓励他们进行自我评价,并提供练习手写的机会。然而,人们对儿童准确书写字母所需的认知(思维)技能并不十分了解。为了研究这个问题,我们对 408 名接受正规学校教育头两年(一年级和二年级)的主流儿童进行了一项研究。该研究考察了儿童根据记忆准确书写小写英文字母的能力,以及他们在书写过程中使用了哪些认知技能。所调查的认知技能与注意力、感知、回忆、计划和执行有关。测试的假设是,正确书写字母的错误可归因于难以有效地运用这些认知技能。研究发现,一年级和二年级学生在书写 26 个小写英文字母时,有一半以上出现错误。得分最低的认知技能是儿童评估自己书写的能力、回忆字母书写方式和位置的能力、从视觉中收集信息的能力,以及在书写时仔细思考以确保准确性的能力。这意味着这些思维能力对儿童正确书写字母的能力影响最大。还需要更多的研究来证实这些发现,并确定本研究中用于测量儿童思维能力的工具的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cognitive strategies utilised by early learners when writing alphabet-letters from memory

Introduction

Occupational therapy handwriting studies have shown cognitive instructional techniques are effective methods to assist beginning or challenged handwriters. However, information about how children's cognitive (thinking) skills impact their handwriting development is scarce. This study examined the cognitive strategy efficiency of early learners while writing the alphabet-letters from memory.

Methods

Participants included 408 mainstream children in their first two years of formal schooling (Year 1 and Year 2). Children were asked to write the 26-lowercase alphabet-letters from memory. Data were collected using alphabet-letters generated by the children and observation of their cognitive strategy use while writing. The measurement tool employed was the Perceive, Recall, Plan, and Perform (PRPP) System of Task Analysis (Stage Two).

Results

The results found that Year 1 and Year 2 children had difficulties applying cognitive strategies across all four PRPP quadrants while writing the lowercase alphabet-letters from memory. Application of the cognitive strategies from the Plan and Recall quadrants showed the most inefficiencies. The lowest PRPP subquadrant scores were observed in Evaluating, Recall Facts, Sensing, and Programming. Except for the Attending subquadrant and the descriptor ‘Regulates’, Year 2 children were significantly better than Year 1 children at applying cognitive strategies from all other PRPP quadrants and subquadrants.

Conclusion

The findings provide beginning evidence that efficient use of cognitive strategies from all four PRPP quadrants is important for children achieving proficiency in accurate and automatic alphabet-letter-writing skills. Recommendations for occupational therapy handwriting assessment and intervention are provided.

Plain Language Summary

Research suggests that occupational therapists can best help children with handwriting difficulties by using a cognitive approach. This approach involves instructing children how to form letters correctly, encouraging self-evaluation, and providing opportunities to practice handwriting. However, the cognitive (thinking) skills required for children to write alphabet-letters accurately are not well understood. To investigate this, a study was conducted on 408 mainstream children in their first two years of formal schooling (Year 1 and Year 2). The study examined how accurately the children could write lowercase alphabet-letters from memory and which cognitive skills they used to do so. The cognitive skills investigated were related to attention, perception, recalling, planning, and performing. The assumption tested was that mistakes in correctly writing alphabet-letters could be attributed to difficulties in using these cognitive skills effectively. The study found that Year 1 and Year 2 children made errors in over half of the 26-lowercase alphabet-letters they wrote. The cognitive skills, which scored the lowest were children's ability to evaluate their writing, recall how and where to write letters, gather information from their vision, and think carefully to ensure accuracy while writing. This implied that these thinking skills had the most impact on the children's ability to write alphabet-letters correctly. More research is needed to confirm these findings and determine the reliability of the tool used in this study to measure the children's thinking skills.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Occupational Therapy Journal is a leading international peer reviewed publication presenting influential, high quality innovative scholarship and research relevant to occupational therapy. The aim of the journal is to be a leader in the dissemination of scholarship and evidence to substantiate, influence and shape policy and occupational therapy practice locally and globally. The journal publishes empirical studies, theoretical papers, and reviews. Preference will be given to manuscripts that have a sound theoretical basis, methodological rigour with sufficient scope and scale to make important new contributions to the occupational therapy body of knowledge. AOTJ does not publish protocols for any study design The journal will consider multidisciplinary or interprofessional studies that include occupational therapy, occupational therapists or occupational therapy students, so long as ‘key points’ highlight the specific implications for occupational therapy, occupational therapists and/or occupational therapy students and/or consumers.
期刊最新文献
Driving a motor vehicle and living with a mental health condition: The personal and professional experiences of consumer lived experience staff. Interoception and its application to paediatric occupational therapy: A scoping review. The experiences of rural generalist occupational therapists in provision of palliative care in rural, regional, and remote Australia: A phenomenological inquiry. The responsiveness and clinical utility of the Australian therapy outcome measure for indigenous clients. Online interventions for the mental health and well-being of parents of children with additional needs: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1