[在无法进行光学生物测量的情况下,评估现代眼内透镜计算公式的准确性]。

Q3 Medicine Vestnik oftalmologii Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.17116/oftalma202414002134
D F Belov, E V Danilenko, V P Nikolaenko, V V Potemkin
{"title":"[在无法进行光学生物测量的情况下,评估现代眼内透镜计算公式的准确性]。","authors":"D F Belov, E V Danilenko, V P Nikolaenko, V V Potemkin","doi":"10.17116/oftalma202414002134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates the accuracy of modern intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas using axial length (AL) data obtained by ultrasound biometry (UBM) compared to the third-generation SRK/T calculator.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study included 230 patients (267 eyes) with severe lens opacities that prevented optical biometry, who underwent phacoemulsification (PE) with IOL implantation. IOL power calculation according to the SRK/T formula was based on AL and anterior chamber depth obtained by UBM (Tomey Biometer Al-100) and keratometry on the Topcon KR 8800 autorefractometer. To adapt AL for new generation calculators - Barrett Universal II (BUII), Hill RBF ver. 3.0 (RBF), Kane and Ladas Super Formula (LSF) - the retinal thickness (0.20 mm) was added to the axial length determined by UBM, and then the optical power of the artificial lens was calculated. The mean error and its modulus value were used as criteria for the accuracy of IOL calculation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant difference (<i>p</i>=0.008) in the mean IOL calculation error was found between the formulas. Pairwise analysis revealed differences between SRK/T (-0.32±0.58 D) and other formulas - BUII (-0.16±0.52 D; <i>p</i>=0.014), RBF (-0.17±0.51 D; <i>p</i>=0.024), Kane (-0.17±0.52 D; <i>p</i>=0.029), but not with the LSF calculator (-0.19±0.53 D; <i>p</i>=0.071). No significant differences between the formulas were found in terms of mean error modulus (<i>p</i>=0.238). New generation calculators showed a more frequent success in hitting target refraction (within ±1.00 D in more than 95% of cases) than the SRK/T formula (86%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed method of adding 0.20 mm to the AL determined by UBM allows using this parameter in modern IOL calculation formulas and improving the refractive results of PE, especially in eyes with non-standard anterior segment structure.</p>","PeriodicalId":23529,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik oftalmologii","volume":"140 2","pages":"34-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Evaluation of the accuracy of modern intraocular lens calculation formulas when optical biometry is not possible].\",\"authors\":\"D F Belov, E V Danilenko, V P Nikolaenko, V V Potemkin\",\"doi\":\"10.17116/oftalma202414002134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates the accuracy of modern intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas using axial length (AL) data obtained by ultrasound biometry (UBM) compared to the third-generation SRK/T calculator.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study included 230 patients (267 eyes) with severe lens opacities that prevented optical biometry, who underwent phacoemulsification (PE) with IOL implantation. IOL power calculation according to the SRK/T formula was based on AL and anterior chamber depth obtained by UBM (Tomey Biometer Al-100) and keratometry on the Topcon KR 8800 autorefractometer. To adapt AL for new generation calculators - Barrett Universal II (BUII), Hill RBF ver. 3.0 (RBF), Kane and Ladas Super Formula (LSF) - the retinal thickness (0.20 mm) was added to the axial length determined by UBM, and then the optical power of the artificial lens was calculated. The mean error and its modulus value were used as criteria for the accuracy of IOL calculation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant difference (<i>p</i>=0.008) in the mean IOL calculation error was found between the formulas. Pairwise analysis revealed differences between SRK/T (-0.32±0.58 D) and other formulas - BUII (-0.16±0.52 D; <i>p</i>=0.014), RBF (-0.17±0.51 D; <i>p</i>=0.024), Kane (-0.17±0.52 D; <i>p</i>=0.029), but not with the LSF calculator (-0.19±0.53 D; <i>p</i>=0.071). No significant differences between the formulas were found in terms of mean error modulus (<i>p</i>=0.238). New generation calculators showed a more frequent success in hitting target refraction (within ±1.00 D in more than 95% of cases) than the SRK/T formula (86%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed method of adding 0.20 mm to the AL determined by UBM allows using this parameter in modern IOL calculation formulas and improving the refractive results of PE, especially in eyes with non-standard anterior segment structure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik oftalmologii\",\"volume\":\"140 2\",\"pages\":\"34-39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik oftalmologii\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma202414002134\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik oftalmologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma202414002134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:与第三代 SRK/T 计算器相比,本研究评估了现代眼内人工晶体(IOL)计算公式使用超声生物测量(UBM)获得的轴长(AL)数据的准确性:研究对象包括230名(267只眼)因严重晶状体混浊而无法进行光学生物测量的患者,他们都接受了人工晶体植入的超声乳化术(PE)。根据 SRK/T 公式计算的人工晶体功率基于 UBM(Tomey Biometer Al-100)获得的角膜厚度和前房深度,以及 Topcon KR 8800 自动屈光仪的角膜度数。为了使AL适用于新一代计算器--Barrett Universal II (BUII)、Hill RBF ver.3.0 (RBF)、Kane 和 Ladas 超级公式 (LSF) - 将视网膜厚度(0.20 毫米)加到 UBM 确定的轴长上,然后计算人工晶状体的光学功率。平均误差及其模量值被用作人工晶体计算准确性的标准:结果:两种公式的人工晶体平均计算误差有明显差异(P=0.008)。配对分析显示,SRK/T(-0.32±0.58 D)与其他公式--BUII(-0.16±0.52 D;p=0.014)、RBF(-0.17±0.51 D;p=0.024)、Kane(-0.17±0.52 D;p=0.029)之间存在差异,但与 LSF 计算器(-0.19±0.53 D;p=0.071)之间没有差异。就平均误差模数而言,两种计算公式之间没有明显差异(p=0.238)。与 SRK/T 公式(86%)相比,新一代计算器更容易达到目标屈光度(95% 以上的案例屈光度在 ±1.00 D 以内):结论:在 UBM 确定的 AL 值基础上增加 0.20 mm 的建议方法允许在现代人工晶体计算公式中使用该参数,并改善 PE 的屈光结果,尤其是对于前节结构不标准的眼睛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Evaluation of the accuracy of modern intraocular lens calculation formulas when optical biometry is not possible].

Purpose: This study evaluates the accuracy of modern intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas using axial length (AL) data obtained by ultrasound biometry (UBM) compared to the third-generation SRK/T calculator.

Material and methods: The study included 230 patients (267 eyes) with severe lens opacities that prevented optical biometry, who underwent phacoemulsification (PE) with IOL implantation. IOL power calculation according to the SRK/T formula was based on AL and anterior chamber depth obtained by UBM (Tomey Biometer Al-100) and keratometry on the Topcon KR 8800 autorefractometer. To adapt AL for new generation calculators - Barrett Universal II (BUII), Hill RBF ver. 3.0 (RBF), Kane and Ladas Super Formula (LSF) - the retinal thickness (0.20 mm) was added to the axial length determined by UBM, and then the optical power of the artificial lens was calculated. The mean error and its modulus value were used as criteria for the accuracy of IOL calculation.

Results: A significant difference (p=0.008) in the mean IOL calculation error was found between the formulas. Pairwise analysis revealed differences between SRK/T (-0.32±0.58 D) and other formulas - BUII (-0.16±0.52 D; p=0.014), RBF (-0.17±0.51 D; p=0.024), Kane (-0.17±0.52 D; p=0.029), but not with the LSF calculator (-0.19±0.53 D; p=0.071). No significant differences between the formulas were found in terms of mean error modulus (p=0.238). New generation calculators showed a more frequent success in hitting target refraction (within ±1.00 D in more than 95% of cases) than the SRK/T formula (86%).

Conclusion: The proposed method of adding 0.20 mm to the AL determined by UBM allows using this parameter in modern IOL calculation formulas and improving the refractive results of PE, especially in eyes with non-standard anterior segment structure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vestnik oftalmologii
Vestnik oftalmologii Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The journal publishes materials on the diagnosis and treatment of eye diseases, hygiene of vision, prevention of ophthalmic affections, history of Russian ophthalmology, organization of ophthalmological aid to the population, as well as the problems of special equipment. Original scientific articles and surveys on urgent problems of theory and practice of Russian and foreign ophthalmology are published. The journal contains book reviews on ophthalmology, information on the activities of ophthalmologists" scientific societies, chronicle of congresses and conferences.The journal is intended for ophthalmologists and scientific workers dealing with clinical problems of diseases of the eye and physiology of vision.
期刊最新文献
[Structural and functional features of the eye in Marfan syndrome. Report 2. Changes in the anatomical complex of the lens]. [Subfamily of betaherpesviruses as a cause of epithelial and stromal keratitis]. [Terson syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia (case report)]. [The association between myopia and glaucoma]. [The effect of pleoptic treatment on the stability of visual fixation in children and adolescents with amblyopia of various degrees].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1