{"title":"弗兰克尔-库帕夫斯基相交族猜想的证明","authors":"Agnijo Banerjee","doi":"10.1007/s00493-024-00105-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A family <span>\\(\\mathcal {F} \\subset \\mathcal {P}(n)\\)</span> is <i>r</i>-<i>wise</i> <i>k</i>-<i>intersecting</i> if <span>\\(|A_1 \\cap \\dots \\cap A_r| \\ge k\\)</span> for any <span>\\(A_1, \\dots , A_r \\in \\mathcal {F}\\)</span>. It is easily seen that if <span>\\(\\mathcal {F}\\)</span> is <i>r</i>-wise <i>k</i>-intersecting for <span>\\(r \\ge 2\\)</span>, <span>\\(k \\ge 1\\)</span> then <span>\\(|\\mathcal {F}| \\le 2^{n-1}\\)</span>. The problem of determining the maximum size of a family <span>\\(\\mathcal {F}\\)</span> that is both <span>\\(r_1\\)</span>-wise <span>\\(k_1\\)</span>-intersecting and <span>\\(r_2\\)</span>-wise <span>\\(k_2\\)</span>-intersecting was raised in 2019 by Frankl and Kupavskii (Combinatorica 39:1255–1266, 2019). They proved the surprising result that, for <span>\\((r_1,k_1) = (3,1)\\)</span> and <span>\\((r_2,k_2) = (2,32)\\)</span> then this maximum is at most <span>\\(2^{n-2}\\)</span>, and conjectured the same holds if <span>\\(k_2\\)</span> is replaced by 3. In this paper we shall not only prove this conjecture but we shall also determine the exact maximum for <span>\\((r_1,k_1) = (3,1)\\)</span> and <span>\\((r_2,k_2) = (2,3)\\)</span> for all <i>n</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50666,"journal":{"name":"Combinatorica","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Proof of a Frankl–Kupavskii Conjecture on Intersecting Families\",\"authors\":\"Agnijo Banerjee\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00493-024-00105-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A family <span>\\\\(\\\\mathcal {F} \\\\subset \\\\mathcal {P}(n)\\\\)</span> is <i>r</i>-<i>wise</i> <i>k</i>-<i>intersecting</i> if <span>\\\\(|A_1 \\\\cap \\\\dots \\\\cap A_r| \\\\ge k\\\\)</span> for any <span>\\\\(A_1, \\\\dots , A_r \\\\in \\\\mathcal {F}\\\\)</span>. It is easily seen that if <span>\\\\(\\\\mathcal {F}\\\\)</span> is <i>r</i>-wise <i>k</i>-intersecting for <span>\\\\(r \\\\ge 2\\\\)</span>, <span>\\\\(k \\\\ge 1\\\\)</span> then <span>\\\\(|\\\\mathcal {F}| \\\\le 2^{n-1}\\\\)</span>. The problem of determining the maximum size of a family <span>\\\\(\\\\mathcal {F}\\\\)</span> that is both <span>\\\\(r_1\\\\)</span>-wise <span>\\\\(k_1\\\\)</span>-intersecting and <span>\\\\(r_2\\\\)</span>-wise <span>\\\\(k_2\\\\)</span>-intersecting was raised in 2019 by Frankl and Kupavskii (Combinatorica 39:1255–1266, 2019). They proved the surprising result that, for <span>\\\\((r_1,k_1) = (3,1)\\\\)</span> and <span>\\\\((r_2,k_2) = (2,32)\\\\)</span> then this maximum is at most <span>\\\\(2^{n-2}\\\\)</span>, and conjectured the same holds if <span>\\\\(k_2\\\\)</span> is replaced by 3. In this paper we shall not only prove this conjecture but we shall also determine the exact maximum for <span>\\\\((r_1,k_1) = (3,1)\\\\)</span> and <span>\\\\((r_2,k_2) = (2,3)\\\\)</span> for all <i>n</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Combinatorica\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Combinatorica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00493-024-00105-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Combinatorica","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00493-024-00105-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Proof of a Frankl–Kupavskii Conjecture on Intersecting Families
A family \(\mathcal {F} \subset \mathcal {P}(n)\) is r-wisek-intersecting if \(|A_1 \cap \dots \cap A_r| \ge k\) for any \(A_1, \dots , A_r \in \mathcal {F}\). It is easily seen that if \(\mathcal {F}\) is r-wise k-intersecting for \(r \ge 2\), \(k \ge 1\) then \(|\mathcal {F}| \le 2^{n-1}\). The problem of determining the maximum size of a family \(\mathcal {F}\) that is both \(r_1\)-wise \(k_1\)-intersecting and \(r_2\)-wise \(k_2\)-intersecting was raised in 2019 by Frankl and Kupavskii (Combinatorica 39:1255–1266, 2019). They proved the surprising result that, for \((r_1,k_1) = (3,1)\) and \((r_2,k_2) = (2,32)\) then this maximum is at most \(2^{n-2}\), and conjectured the same holds if \(k_2\) is replaced by 3. In this paper we shall not only prove this conjecture but we shall also determine the exact maximum for \((r_1,k_1) = (3,1)\) and \((r_2,k_2) = (2,3)\) for all n.
期刊介绍:
COMBINATORICA publishes research papers in English in a variety of areas of combinatorics and the theory of computing, with particular emphasis on general techniques and unifying principles. Typical but not exclusive topics covered by COMBINATORICA are
- Combinatorial structures (graphs, hypergraphs, matroids, designs, permutation groups).
- Combinatorial optimization.
- Combinatorial aspects of geometry and number theory.
- Algorithms in combinatorics and related fields.
- Computational complexity theory.
- Randomization and explicit construction in combinatorics and algorithms.