使用儿科多工具比较 (P-MIC) 研究数据比较 EQ-5D-Y-3L 和 EQ-5D-Y-5L 的心理测量特性。

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS PharmacoEconomics Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1007/s40273-024-01379-7
Mina Bahrampour, Nancy Devlin, Renee Jones, Kim Dalziel, Brendan Mulhern
{"title":"使用儿科多工具比较 (P-MIC) 研究数据比较 EQ-5D-Y-3L 和 EQ-5D-Y-5L 的心理测量特性。","authors":"Mina Bahrampour, Nancy Devlin, Renee Jones, Kim Dalziel, Brendan Mulhern","doi":"10.1007/s40273-024-01379-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The EQ-5D-Y is a generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure suitable for children and adolescents. There are two versions of the instrument, which differ in response levels: the three- (Y-3L) and five-level (Y-5L) versions. The Y-5L has been developed to improve the psychometric performance of the Y-3L.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess the psychometric properties of Y-5L and to compare the performance of Y-5L with Y-3L in separate self- and proxy-reported samples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Both versions of the instrument were administered to children/adolescents (self-report) or caregivers (proxy-report) of Australian children aged 5-18 years. The data were gathered as part of the Australian Paediatric Multi-Instrument Comparison (P-MIC) study. The Y-5L and Y-3L were evaluated in terms of ceiling effects, criterion validity, inconsistency, informativity, and test-retest reliability in both proxy and self-complete populations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 5945 respondents completed both the Y-3L and Y-5L, with 2083 proxy and 3862 self-completed responses. Ceiling effects were lower in the Y-5L than the Y-3L. Items from the same domains show the strongest correlation for both samples. Regarding informativity, the Y-5L demonstrated more discriminatory power, indicated by having a higher Shannon diversity index in all domains of the Y-5L compared with the Y-3L. Test-retest showed fair agreement between responses at baseline and follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Y-5L has demonstrated moderate validity and fair reliability for use in measuring HRQoL in children and adolescents, both when self-reported by children or proxy reported. Overall, Y-5L is a dependable and valid extension from the Y-3L.</p>","PeriodicalId":19807,"journal":{"name":"PharmacoEconomics","volume":" ","pages":"95-111"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11168989/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of the EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L Using Paediatric Multi-Instrument Comparison (P-MIC) Study Data.\",\"authors\":\"Mina Bahrampour, Nancy Devlin, Renee Jones, Kim Dalziel, Brendan Mulhern\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40273-024-01379-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The EQ-5D-Y is a generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure suitable for children and adolescents. There are two versions of the instrument, which differ in response levels: the three- (Y-3L) and five-level (Y-5L) versions. The Y-5L has been developed to improve the psychometric performance of the Y-3L.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess the psychometric properties of Y-5L and to compare the performance of Y-5L with Y-3L in separate self- and proxy-reported samples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Both versions of the instrument were administered to children/adolescents (self-report) or caregivers (proxy-report) of Australian children aged 5-18 years. The data were gathered as part of the Australian Paediatric Multi-Instrument Comparison (P-MIC) study. The Y-5L and Y-3L were evaluated in terms of ceiling effects, criterion validity, inconsistency, informativity, and test-retest reliability in both proxy and self-complete populations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 5945 respondents completed both the Y-3L and Y-5L, with 2083 proxy and 3862 self-completed responses. Ceiling effects were lower in the Y-5L than the Y-3L. Items from the same domains show the strongest correlation for both samples. Regarding informativity, the Y-5L demonstrated more discriminatory power, indicated by having a higher Shannon diversity index in all domains of the Y-5L compared with the Y-3L. Test-retest showed fair agreement between responses at baseline and follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Y-5L has demonstrated moderate validity and fair reliability for use in measuring HRQoL in children and adolescents, both when self-reported by children or proxy reported. Overall, Y-5L is a dependable and valid extension from the Y-3L.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PharmacoEconomics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"95-111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11168989/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PharmacoEconomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-024-01379-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PharmacoEconomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-024-01379-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:EQ-5D-Y 是一种适用于儿童和青少年的通用健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)测量方法。该工具有两个版本,在反应水平上有所不同:三水平(Y-3L)和五水平(Y-5L)版本。Y-5L 的开发是为了提高 Y-3L 的心理测量性能:本研究旨在评估 Y-5L 的心理测量特性,并比较 Y-5L 和 Y-3L 在不同的自我报告样本和代理报告样本中的表现:该工具的两个版本均由澳大利亚 5-18 岁儿童/青少年(自我报告)或照顾者(代理报告)使用。这些数据是作为澳大利亚儿科多工具比较(P-MIC)研究的一部分收集的。从天花板效应、标准效度、不一致性、信息量和测试-再测可靠性等方面对Y-5L和Y-3L进行了评估:共有 5945 名受访者同时完成了 Y-3L 和 Y-5L 测验,其中代理受访者有 2083 人,自填受访者有 3862 人。Y-5L的上限效应低于Y-3L。同一领域的项目在两个样本中显示出最强的相关性。在信息量方面,与 Y-3L 相比,Y-5L 在所有领域都具有更高的香农多样性指数,这表明 Y-5L 具有更强的判别能力。测试-重复测试表明,基线和随访时的回答具有相当的一致性:Y-5L在测量儿童和青少年的HRQoL时,无论是儿童自我报告还是代理报告,都显示出中等程度的有效性和相当的可靠性。总的来说,Y-5L 是 Y-3L 的可靠和有效的延伸。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of the EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L Using Paediatric Multi-Instrument Comparison (P-MIC) Study Data.

Background: The EQ-5D-Y is a generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure suitable for children and adolescents. There are two versions of the instrument, which differ in response levels: the three- (Y-3L) and five-level (Y-5L) versions. The Y-5L has been developed to improve the psychometric performance of the Y-3L.

Objective: This study aims to assess the psychometric properties of Y-5L and to compare the performance of Y-5L with Y-3L in separate self- and proxy-reported samples.

Methods: Both versions of the instrument were administered to children/adolescents (self-report) or caregivers (proxy-report) of Australian children aged 5-18 years. The data were gathered as part of the Australian Paediatric Multi-Instrument Comparison (P-MIC) study. The Y-5L and Y-3L were evaluated in terms of ceiling effects, criterion validity, inconsistency, informativity, and test-retest reliability in both proxy and self-complete populations.

Results: Overall, 5945 respondents completed both the Y-3L and Y-5L, with 2083 proxy and 3862 self-completed responses. Ceiling effects were lower in the Y-5L than the Y-3L. Items from the same domains show the strongest correlation for both samples. Regarding informativity, the Y-5L demonstrated more discriminatory power, indicated by having a higher Shannon diversity index in all domains of the Y-5L compared with the Y-3L. Test-retest showed fair agreement between responses at baseline and follow-up.

Conclusion: The Y-5L has demonstrated moderate validity and fair reliability for use in measuring HRQoL in children and adolescents, both when self-reported by children or proxy reported. Overall, Y-5L is a dependable and valid extension from the Y-3L.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PharmacoEconomics
PharmacoEconomics 医学-药学
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: PharmacoEconomics is the benchmark journal for peer-reviewed, authoritative and practical articles on the application of pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life assessment to optimum drug therapy and health outcomes. An invaluable source of applied pharmacoeconomic original research and educational material for the healthcare decision maker. PharmacoEconomics is dedicated to the clear communication of complex pharmacoeconomic issues related to patient care and drug utilization. PharmacoEconomics offers a range of additional features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand the scientific content and overall implications of the article.
期刊最新文献
Cost and Cost Effectiveness of Treatments for Psoriatic Arthritis: An Updated Systematic Literature Review. Effects and Costs of Hepatitis C Virus Elimination for the Whole Population in China: A Modelling Study. MPES-R: Multi-Parameter Evidence Synthesis in R for Survival Extrapolation-A Tutorial. Different Models, Same Results: Considerations When Choosing Between Approaches to Model Cost Effectiveness of Chimeric-Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy Versus Standard of Care. Evidence Following Conditional NICE Technology Appraisal Recommendations: A Critical Analysis of Methods, Quality and Risk of Bias.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1