产前住院患者预防性使用非分缩肝素:随机对照试验

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-14 DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005599
Thalia Mok, Anissa V Nguyen, Lorna Kwan, Irving Steinberg, Cristianna Vallera, Neil S Silverman, Rashmi Rao
{"title":"产前住院患者预防性使用非分缩肝素:随机对照试验","authors":"Thalia Mok, Anissa V Nguyen, Lorna Kwan, Irving Steinberg, Cristianna Vallera, Neil S Silverman, Rashmi Rao","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effect of gestational age-based dosing of unfractionated heparin (UFH) compared with standard dosing of UFH for thromboprophylaxis on an elevated serum activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) during prolonged antepartum hospitalizations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a randomized trial of pregnant persons who were admitted in the antepartum period for at least 72 hours. Participants were randomly allocated to the standard dose of UFH (5,000 units subcutaneously every 12 hours) or the gestational age-based dose of UFH (first trimester [less than 14 weeks]: 5,000 units subcutaneously every 12 hours; second trimester [14-27 6/7 weeks]: 7,500 units subcutaneously every 12 hours; third trimester (28 weeks or more): 10,000 units subcutaneously every 12 hours). The primary outcome was the proportion of antepartum patients who had an elevated serum aPTT value above the normal range (more than 36.2 seconds) 6 hours after an UFH dose. Secondary outcomes included the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and reported side effects of heparin administration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between December 15, 2020, and April 1, 2022, 97 patients with antepartum hospitalizations were screened and 46 were randomized: 22 allocated to standard dosing and 24 allocated to gestational age-based dosing of UFH. A significantly greater proportion of antepartum patients who received gestational age-based dosing had an abnormal elevation in aPTT compared with those who received standard dosing (33.3% vs 4.8%, P =.02). Gestational age-based dosing resulted in higher maximum [interquartile range] aPTT (30.4 [27.4, 37.5] vs 26.6 [23.0, 29.6], P =.01) and anti-Xa levels (0.09 [0.09, 0.11] vs 0.09 [0.09, 0.09], P =.04). There was no significant difference in VTE between groups ( P =.47).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gestational age-based dosing of UFH for thromboprophylaxis of antepartum hospitalizations was associated with significantly increased rates of elevated coagulation parameters compared with standard fixed dosing. This study suggests a need for close monitoring if higher doses of UFH during pregnancy are used later in gestation. The efficacy of gestational age-based dosing compared with standard dosing for UFH to prevent thromboembolic events remains an area for future investigation.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04635839.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prophylactic Unfractionated Heparin in Antepartum Hospitalizations: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Thalia Mok, Anissa V Nguyen, Lorna Kwan, Irving Steinberg, Cristianna Vallera, Neil S Silverman, Rashmi Rao\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effect of gestational age-based dosing of unfractionated heparin (UFH) compared with standard dosing of UFH for thromboprophylaxis on an elevated serum activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) during prolonged antepartum hospitalizations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a randomized trial of pregnant persons who were admitted in the antepartum period for at least 72 hours. Participants were randomly allocated to the standard dose of UFH (5,000 units subcutaneously every 12 hours) or the gestational age-based dose of UFH (first trimester [less than 14 weeks]: 5,000 units subcutaneously every 12 hours; second trimester [14-27 6/7 weeks]: 7,500 units subcutaneously every 12 hours; third trimester (28 weeks or more): 10,000 units subcutaneously every 12 hours). The primary outcome was the proportion of antepartum patients who had an elevated serum aPTT value above the normal range (more than 36.2 seconds) 6 hours after an UFH dose. Secondary outcomes included the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and reported side effects of heparin administration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between December 15, 2020, and April 1, 2022, 97 patients with antepartum hospitalizations were screened and 46 were randomized: 22 allocated to standard dosing and 24 allocated to gestational age-based dosing of UFH. A significantly greater proportion of antepartum patients who received gestational age-based dosing had an abnormal elevation in aPTT compared with those who received standard dosing (33.3% vs 4.8%, P =.02). Gestational age-based dosing resulted in higher maximum [interquartile range] aPTT (30.4 [27.4, 37.5] vs 26.6 [23.0, 29.6], P =.01) and anti-Xa levels (0.09 [0.09, 0.11] vs 0.09 [0.09, 0.09], P =.04). There was no significant difference in VTE between groups ( P =.47).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gestational age-based dosing of UFH for thromboprophylaxis of antepartum hospitalizations was associated with significantly increased rates of elevated coagulation parameters compared with standard fixed dosing. This study suggests a need for close monitoring if higher doses of UFH during pregnancy are used later in gestation. The efficacy of gestational age-based dosing compared with standard dosing for UFH to prevent thromboembolic events remains an area for future investigation.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04635839.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrics and gynecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrics and gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005599\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005599","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估在产前住院时间较长的情况下,与标准剂量的血栓预防用药UFH相比,基于胎龄的无收缩肝素(UFH)剂量对血清活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)升高的影响:这是一项针对产前住院至少 72 小时的孕妇的随机试验。参与者被随机分配到标准剂量的 UFH(每 12 小时皮下注射 5,000 单位)或基于胎龄的 UFH 剂量(头三个月[小于 14 周]:每 12 小时皮下注射 5,000 单位):第一孕期[少于 14 周]:每 12 小时皮下注射 5,000 单位;第二孕期[14-27 6/7 周]:每 12 小时皮下注射 7,500 单位;第三孕期(28 周或以上):每 12 小时皮下注射 10,000 单位:每 12 小时皮下注射 10,000 单位)。主要结果是产前患者在服用 UFH 6 小时后血清 aPTT 值升高超过正常范围(超过 36.2 秒)的比例。次要结果包括静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)的发生率和肝素用药的副作用报告:2020年12月15日至2022年4月1日期间,97名产前检查住院患者接受了筛查,46名患者被随机分配:22名分配到标准剂量,24名分配到基于胎龄的UFH剂量。与接受标准剂量的患者相比,接受妊娠年龄剂量的产前患者出现 aPTT 异常升高的比例明显更高(33.3% 对 4.8%,P=.02)。根据妊娠年龄给药的患者的 aPTT 最大值(30.4 [27.4, 37.5] vs 26.6 [23.0, 29.6],P=.01)和抗 Xa 水平(0.09 [0.09, 0.11] vs 0.09 [0.09, 0.09],P=.04)均较高。各组间的 VTE 无明显差异(P=.47):结论:与标准固定剂量相比,基于妊娠年龄的 UFH 用于产前住院血栓预防与凝血指标升高率显著增加有关。这项研究表明,如果在妊娠后期使用更大剂量的 UFH,则需要密切监测。与标准剂量的 UFH 相比,基于妊娠年龄的剂量对预防血栓栓塞事件的疗效仍是未来需要研究的领域:临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT04635839。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prophylactic Unfractionated Heparin in Antepartum Hospitalizations: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective: To assess the effect of gestational age-based dosing of unfractionated heparin (UFH) compared with standard dosing of UFH for thromboprophylaxis on an elevated serum activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) during prolonged antepartum hospitalizations.

Methods: This was a randomized trial of pregnant persons who were admitted in the antepartum period for at least 72 hours. Participants were randomly allocated to the standard dose of UFH (5,000 units subcutaneously every 12 hours) or the gestational age-based dose of UFH (first trimester [less than 14 weeks]: 5,000 units subcutaneously every 12 hours; second trimester [14-27 6/7 weeks]: 7,500 units subcutaneously every 12 hours; third trimester (28 weeks or more): 10,000 units subcutaneously every 12 hours). The primary outcome was the proportion of antepartum patients who had an elevated serum aPTT value above the normal range (more than 36.2 seconds) 6 hours after an UFH dose. Secondary outcomes included the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and reported side effects of heparin administration.

Results: Between December 15, 2020, and April 1, 2022, 97 patients with antepartum hospitalizations were screened and 46 were randomized: 22 allocated to standard dosing and 24 allocated to gestational age-based dosing of UFH. A significantly greater proportion of antepartum patients who received gestational age-based dosing had an abnormal elevation in aPTT compared with those who received standard dosing (33.3% vs 4.8%, P =.02). Gestational age-based dosing resulted in higher maximum [interquartile range] aPTT (30.4 [27.4, 37.5] vs 26.6 [23.0, 29.6], P =.01) and anti-Xa levels (0.09 [0.09, 0.11] vs 0.09 [0.09, 0.09], P =.04). There was no significant difference in VTE between groups ( P =.47).

Conclusion: Gestational age-based dosing of UFH for thromboprophylaxis of antepartum hospitalizations was associated with significantly increased rates of elevated coagulation parameters compared with standard fixed dosing. This study suggests a need for close monitoring if higher doses of UFH during pregnancy are used later in gestation. The efficacy of gestational age-based dosing compared with standard dosing for UFH to prevent thromboembolic events remains an area for future investigation.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04635839.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obstetrics and gynecology
Obstetrics and gynecology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
867
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: "Obstetrics & Gynecology," affectionately known as "The Green Journal," is the official publication of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Since its inception in 1953, the journal has been dedicated to advancing the clinical practice of obstetrics and gynecology, as well as related fields. The journal's mission is to promote excellence in these areas by publishing a diverse range of articles that cover translational and clinical topics. "Obstetrics & Gynecology" provides a platform for the dissemination of evidence-based research, clinical guidelines, and expert opinions that are essential for the continuous improvement of women's health care. The journal's content is designed to inform and educate obstetricians, gynecologists, and other healthcare professionals, ensuring that they stay abreast of the latest developments and best practices in their field.
期刊最新文献
False-Positive Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 Test Results With Rapid Seroreversion After Third-Trimester Tdap Booster Vaccination. Compliance Rate With Triage Test and Treatment for Participants Screening Positive in Cervical Cancer Screening Programs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Effects of Antihypertensive Therapy During Pregnancy on Postpartum Blood Pressure Control. Management of Vulvovaginal Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis. Navigating the Legal Landscape of Reproductive Rights and Medical Training After LePage v. Mobile Infirmary Clinic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1