Tran Thi Anh Tuyet, Nguyen Van Thai, Nguyen Tien Thinh, Mai Thanh Binh
{"title":"内镜逆行胰胆管造影术治疗越南比尔罗斯 II 型胃肠造口术患者胆总管结石的改良实际应用。","authors":"Tran Thi Anh Tuyet, Nguyen Van Thai, Nguyen Tien Thinh, Mai Thanh Binh","doi":"10.1177/26317745241251713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients who have undergone Billroth II gastroenterostomy (B-II GE) has been challenging, requiring flexibility in technical approaches during execution. The study aims to assess the effectiveness of enhanced techniques in performing ERCP on this patient group in Vietnam.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 42 Vietnamese patients with B-II GE performed an ERCP using a duodenoscope or a modification of ERCP equipment (a cap-fitted regular forward-viewing endoscope) if the former failed. The effectiveness and safety of the ERCP technique were assessed, particularly in patients who underwent the forward-viewing endoscope method.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 39 out of 42 patients had the Vater's papilla identified, among whom 12 patients (30.8%) achieved successful cannulation into the bile duct using a side-viewing endoscope, significantly lower than the success rate using a forward-viewing endoscope (25/27, counted 92.6%, with <i>p</i> < 0.001). After successful cannulation, the rate of stone clearance, the procedural time, and the hospitalization duration of the patients were equivalent between the two methods and were not dependent on the number or size of the stones. On the other hand, post-ERCP complications in patients utilizing forward-viewing endoscopy included acute pancreatitis (22.2%), post-sphincterotomy bleeding (3.7%), septicemia (4.8%), and perforation (0%). These complications were mild and amenable to conservative endoscopic and medical management, and no mortality was observed. The rates of complications and adverse events after ERCP are comparable between the two treatment methods, even though the end-viewing endoscope is used after the failure of the side-viewing endoscope.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Alter ERCP utilizing a cap-fitted forward-viewing endoscope can be a primary choice for treating common bile duct stones in patients with a Billroth II gastric resection history because of high efficacy and acceptable complications. It requires a high level of procedural expertise that requires multiple training sessions.</p>","PeriodicalId":40947,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"17 ","pages":"26317745241251713"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11092305/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practical application of the modification in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography treated common bile duct stones in patients with Billroth II gastroenterostomy in Vietnam.\",\"authors\":\"Tran Thi Anh Tuyet, Nguyen Van Thai, Nguyen Tien Thinh, Mai Thanh Binh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26317745241251713\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients who have undergone Billroth II gastroenterostomy (B-II GE) has been challenging, requiring flexibility in technical approaches during execution. The study aims to assess the effectiveness of enhanced techniques in performing ERCP on this patient group in Vietnam.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 42 Vietnamese patients with B-II GE performed an ERCP using a duodenoscope or a modification of ERCP equipment (a cap-fitted regular forward-viewing endoscope) if the former failed. The effectiveness and safety of the ERCP technique were assessed, particularly in patients who underwent the forward-viewing endoscope method.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 39 out of 42 patients had the Vater's papilla identified, among whom 12 patients (30.8%) achieved successful cannulation into the bile duct using a side-viewing endoscope, significantly lower than the success rate using a forward-viewing endoscope (25/27, counted 92.6%, with <i>p</i> < 0.001). After successful cannulation, the rate of stone clearance, the procedural time, and the hospitalization duration of the patients were equivalent between the two methods and were not dependent on the number or size of the stones. On the other hand, post-ERCP complications in patients utilizing forward-viewing endoscopy included acute pancreatitis (22.2%), post-sphincterotomy bleeding (3.7%), septicemia (4.8%), and perforation (0%). These complications were mild and amenable to conservative endoscopic and medical management, and no mortality was observed. The rates of complications and adverse events after ERCP are comparable between the two treatment methods, even though the end-viewing endoscope is used after the failure of the side-viewing endoscope.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Alter ERCP utilizing a cap-fitted forward-viewing endoscope can be a primary choice for treating common bile duct stones in patients with a Billroth II gastric resection history because of high efficacy and acceptable complications. It requires a high level of procedural expertise that requires multiple training sessions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"26317745241251713\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11092305/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26317745241251713\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26317745241251713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:对接受过比尔罗斯 II 型胃肠造口术(B-II GE)的患者进行内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)一直是一项挑战,需要在实施过程中灵活运用技术方法。本研究旨在评估在越南对这一患者群体实施ERCP时增强技术的有效性:方法:共为 42 名越南 B-II GE 患者进行了 ERCP,如果前者失败,则使用十二指肠镜或 ERCP 设备的改良版(带帽普通前视内镜)。对ERCP技术的有效性和安全性进行了评估,尤其是对采用前视内窥镜方法的患者:结果:42 名患者中共有 39 名患者确定了 Vater 乳头,其中有 12 名患者(30.8%)使用侧视内窥镜成功插入胆管,明显低于使用前视内窥镜的成功率(25/27,占 92.6%,P 结论:ERCP 技术应改变使用帽状内窥镜的方法:使用带帽前视内镜的 Alter ERCP 可作为治疗有比洛斯 II 型胃切除术史患者胆总管结石的首选方法,因为其疗效高且并发症可接受。它对手术的专业性要求很高,需要多次培训。
Practical application of the modification in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography treated common bile duct stones in patients with Billroth II gastroenterostomy in Vietnam.
Objective: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients who have undergone Billroth II gastroenterostomy (B-II GE) has been challenging, requiring flexibility in technical approaches during execution. The study aims to assess the effectiveness of enhanced techniques in performing ERCP on this patient group in Vietnam.
Method: A total of 42 Vietnamese patients with B-II GE performed an ERCP using a duodenoscope or a modification of ERCP equipment (a cap-fitted regular forward-viewing endoscope) if the former failed. The effectiveness and safety of the ERCP technique were assessed, particularly in patients who underwent the forward-viewing endoscope method.
Result: A total of 39 out of 42 patients had the Vater's papilla identified, among whom 12 patients (30.8%) achieved successful cannulation into the bile duct using a side-viewing endoscope, significantly lower than the success rate using a forward-viewing endoscope (25/27, counted 92.6%, with p < 0.001). After successful cannulation, the rate of stone clearance, the procedural time, and the hospitalization duration of the patients were equivalent between the two methods and were not dependent on the number or size of the stones. On the other hand, post-ERCP complications in patients utilizing forward-viewing endoscopy included acute pancreatitis (22.2%), post-sphincterotomy bleeding (3.7%), septicemia (4.8%), and perforation (0%). These complications were mild and amenable to conservative endoscopic and medical management, and no mortality was observed. The rates of complications and adverse events after ERCP are comparable between the two treatment methods, even though the end-viewing endoscope is used after the failure of the side-viewing endoscope.
Conclusion: Alter ERCP utilizing a cap-fitted forward-viewing endoscope can be a primary choice for treating common bile duct stones in patients with a Billroth II gastric resection history because of high efficacy and acceptable complications. It requires a high level of procedural expertise that requires multiple training sessions.