{"title":"科罗拉多州和美国西部的水与农业:大卫-斯蒂勒(David Stiller)所著的《格兰德河的第一线》(评论","authors":"Amahia Mallea","doi":"10.1353/tech.2024.a926344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Water and Agriculture in Colorado and the American West: First in Line for the Rio Grande</em> by David Stiller <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Amahia Mallea (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Water and Agriculture in Colorado and the American West: First in Line for the Rio Grande</em> By David Stiller. Reno: University of Nevada Press, 2021. Pp. 188. <p>The focus of <em>Water and Agriculture in Colorado and the American West</em> is the San Luis Valley in southern Colorado. The valley is bounded by the San Juan and Sangre de Cristo Mountains, and the seasonal snowmelt forms the upper Rio Grande River, which greens this intensely irrigated valley.</p> <p>The Colorado Doctrine of water law that developed in the mid-nineteenth century, first with mining and then with agriculture, became the prior appropriation water law that now governs this valley and the U.S. West. The law is often summarized as \"first in time, first in right,\" and it allows water to be controlled by private interests, despite being a valuable public resource.</p> <p>Environmental historian David Stiller's perspective on water is shaped by his personal experience as an \"irrigator\"—an identity differentiated from a landowner and conveying a more specific set of challenges than \"farmer.\" Stiller seeks to build empathy for the irrigator and to enumerate the insecurities faced by rural agricultural communities dependent on overpromised water resources in a time of drought, population growth, and climate change. Stiller doesn't sugarcoat the economic and environmental challenges; he acknowledges that the San Luis Valley, like the arid West, has a mismatch between expectations and reality that is historically rooted.</p> <p>Adding to the history of western water and land use—like Donald Worster's classic <em>Rivers of Empire</em> (1992)—this monograph draws attention to the Rio Grande, instead of the oft-discussed Colorado River. Although the back-of-the-book summary highlights the Indigenous Utes and the Hispanos (Spanish settlers in the 1850s who used community-based irrigation called acequias), the author does not say much about the process of dispossession. The text is focused on the Anglo-American farmers who arrived after the U.S. Civil War and who continue to dominate the valley today. More attention to the legacy, culture, and management of acequias would have further differentiated the Rio Grande and presented historical alternatives for organizing and operating water systems.</p> <p>Stiller connects irrigation technologies to resource exploitation that harmed communities. Four main canals were in place by the 1880s, initiating the first era of unsustainable development in the San Luis Valley. This canal-building boom and \"bonanza farming\" (p. 37) left the Rio Grande dry <strong>[End Page 722]</strong> for downstream users in New Mexico, Texas, and Mexico. Earthen dams upstream, and the Elephant Butte Dam downstream, sought to address water limitations and inequity. Flood (as opposed to furrow) irrigators raised the water table in the San Luis Valley, allowing for junior water right holders to access well water. Basically, irrigators redirected the river and created an aquifer in the valley. Postwar well drilling was largely unregulated, and by the 1970s, a wildcat era of pumping, center-pivot irrigation was common. Though center pivot was more efficient, it was \"a double-edged sword\" (p. 85); the number of junior water rights holders bypassing prior appropriation increased productivity and further taxed resources. Additionally, starting in the early twentieth century, the extensive subirrigation resulted in soil salinity that damaged farmland.</p> <p>The boom and bust of innovation followed by resource exploitation has not created stability for agricultural communities. Stiller concludes that \"only innovative thinking attained a limited degree of equanimity\" (p. 122), by which he refers to the collaborative efforts of irrigationists, conservationists, and regulators. These include the 1938 Rio Grande Compact, water districts, and a twenty-first-century computer model mapping the valley's hydrology, which created data for decision-making. Outside menaces to the valley—like state intervention or urban thirst—have united San Luis Valley residents to address problems cooperatively.</p> <p>This development of water resources in the upper Rio Grande remains relevant. Current challenges include recurring droughts, climate change, and the pressing demand for water coming from urban Colorado. The metropolitan Front Range has the money to purchase water, and willing sellers exist, but the regulating water...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Water and Agriculture in Colorado and the American West: First in Line for the Rio Grande by David Stiller (review)\",\"authors\":\"Amahia Mallea\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/tech.2024.a926344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Water and Agriculture in Colorado and the American West: First in Line for the Rio Grande</em> by David Stiller <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Amahia Mallea (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Water and Agriculture in Colorado and the American West: First in Line for the Rio Grande</em> By David Stiller. Reno: University of Nevada Press, 2021. Pp. 188. <p>The focus of <em>Water and Agriculture in Colorado and the American West</em> is the San Luis Valley in southern Colorado. The valley is bounded by the San Juan and Sangre de Cristo Mountains, and the seasonal snowmelt forms the upper Rio Grande River, which greens this intensely irrigated valley.</p> <p>The Colorado Doctrine of water law that developed in the mid-nineteenth century, first with mining and then with agriculture, became the prior appropriation water law that now governs this valley and the U.S. West. The law is often summarized as \\\"first in time, first in right,\\\" and it allows water to be controlled by private interests, despite being a valuable public resource.</p> <p>Environmental historian David Stiller's perspective on water is shaped by his personal experience as an \\\"irrigator\\\"—an identity differentiated from a landowner and conveying a more specific set of challenges than \\\"farmer.\\\" Stiller seeks to build empathy for the irrigator and to enumerate the insecurities faced by rural agricultural communities dependent on overpromised water resources in a time of drought, population growth, and climate change. Stiller doesn't sugarcoat the economic and environmental challenges; he acknowledges that the San Luis Valley, like the arid West, has a mismatch between expectations and reality that is historically rooted.</p> <p>Adding to the history of western water and land use—like Donald Worster's classic <em>Rivers of Empire</em> (1992)—this monograph draws attention to the Rio Grande, instead of the oft-discussed Colorado River. Although the back-of-the-book summary highlights the Indigenous Utes and the Hispanos (Spanish settlers in the 1850s who used community-based irrigation called acequias), the author does not say much about the process of dispossession. The text is focused on the Anglo-American farmers who arrived after the U.S. Civil War and who continue to dominate the valley today. More attention to the legacy, culture, and management of acequias would have further differentiated the Rio Grande and presented historical alternatives for organizing and operating water systems.</p> <p>Stiller connects irrigation technologies to resource exploitation that harmed communities. Four main canals were in place by the 1880s, initiating the first era of unsustainable development in the San Luis Valley. This canal-building boom and \\\"bonanza farming\\\" (p. 37) left the Rio Grande dry <strong>[End Page 722]</strong> for downstream users in New Mexico, Texas, and Mexico. Earthen dams upstream, and the Elephant Butte Dam downstream, sought to address water limitations and inequity. Flood (as opposed to furrow) irrigators raised the water table in the San Luis Valley, allowing for junior water right holders to access well water. Basically, irrigators redirected the river and created an aquifer in the valley. Postwar well drilling was largely unregulated, and by the 1970s, a wildcat era of pumping, center-pivot irrigation was common. Though center pivot was more efficient, it was \\\"a double-edged sword\\\" (p. 85); the number of junior water rights holders bypassing prior appropriation increased productivity and further taxed resources. Additionally, starting in the early twentieth century, the extensive subirrigation resulted in soil salinity that damaged farmland.</p> <p>The boom and bust of innovation followed by resource exploitation has not created stability for agricultural communities. Stiller concludes that \\\"only innovative thinking attained a limited degree of equanimity\\\" (p. 122), by which he refers to the collaborative efforts of irrigationists, conservationists, and regulators. These include the 1938 Rio Grande Compact, water districts, and a twenty-first-century computer model mapping the valley's hydrology, which created data for decision-making. Outside menaces to the valley—like state intervention or urban thirst—have united San Luis Valley residents to address problems cooperatively.</p> <p>This development of water resources in the upper Rio Grande remains relevant. Current challenges include recurring droughts, climate change, and the pressing demand for water coming from urban Colorado. The metropolitan Front Range has the money to purchase water, and willing sellers exist, but the regulating water...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology and Culture\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a926344\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a926344","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
审查人 科罗拉多州和美国西部的水与农业:科罗拉多州和美国西部的水与农业:格兰德河的第一线》(First in Line for the Rio Grande),作者:David Stiller Amahia Mallea(简历):科罗拉多和美国西部的水与农业:格兰德河的第一线 作者:大卫-斯蒂勒。里诺:内华达大学出版社,2021 年。第 188 页。188.科罗拉多州和美国西部的水与农业》的重点是科罗拉多州南部的圣路易斯山谷。山谷以圣胡安山脉和桑格雷-德克里斯托山脉为界,季节性融雪形成格兰德河上游,为这个灌溉密集的山谷提供水源。科罗拉多水法理论是在十九世纪中期发展起来的,先是随着采矿业的发展,然后是农业的发展,成为了现在管辖这个山谷和美国西部的先占水法。该法通常被概括为 "时间在先,权利在先",尽管水是一种宝贵的公共资源,但它允许私人利益集团控制水资源。环境史学家戴维-斯蒂勒(David Stiller)对水的看法是由他作为一名 "灌溉者 "的个人经历所决定的--这一身份有别于土地所有者,比 "农民 "所面临的挑战更为具体。斯蒂勒试图与灌溉者建立共鸣,并列举在干旱、人口增长和气候变化的时代,依赖于过度承诺的水资源的农村农业社区所面临的不安全因素。斯蒂勒没有粉饰经济和环境方面的挑战;他承认圣路易斯河谷与干旱的西部一样,在期望与现实之间存在着历史根源上的不匹配。与唐纳德-沃斯特(Donald Worster)的经典著作《帝国之河》(Rivers of Empire,1992 年)一样,这本专著对西部水资源和土地利用的历史进行了补充,将人们的注意力吸引到格兰德河,而不是经常讨论的科罗拉多河。虽然书后的摘要强调了土著犹特人和西班牙人(19 世纪 50 年代的西班牙定居者,他们使用社区灌溉系统,称为 acequias),但作者并没有过多地介绍剥夺过程。该书的重点是美国内战后到来的英裔美国农民,他们至今仍在山谷中占主导地位。如果能更多地关注acequias 的遗产、文化和管理,就能进一步区分格兰德河流域,并介绍组织和运营水系统的历史替代方案。Stiller 将灌溉技术与危害社区的资源开发联系起来。到 19 世纪 80 年代,四条主要运河已经建成,开启了圣路易斯河谷第一个不可持续发展的时代。修建运河的热潮和 "大丰收农业"(第 37 页)使得格兰德河干涸 [第 722 页完] ,下游的新墨西哥州、德克萨斯州和墨西哥的用户无法使用。上游的土坝和下游的象鼻山大坝试图解决水资源的限制和不公平问题。洪水灌溉(而不是犁沟灌溉)提高了圣路易斯河谷的地下水位,使初级水权持有者能够获得井水。基本上,灌溉者改变了河流的流向,在山谷中形成了一个含水层。战后打井基本上不受管制,到 20 世纪 70 年代,抽水的野猫时代到来,中心枢轴灌溉非常普遍。虽然中心枢轴灌溉效率更高,但它也是一把 "双刃剑"(第 85 页);绕过事先分配的初级水权持有者的数量提高了生产率,进一步加重了资源的负担。此外,从 20 世纪初开始,大面积的灌溉导致土壤盐碱化,破坏了农田。资源开发之后的创新繁荣与萧条并没有为农业社区带来稳定。Stiller 的结论是 "只有创新思维才能实现有限程度的平静"(第 122 页),他指的是灌溉专家、保护专家和监管者的合作努力。其中包括 1938 年的格兰德河契约、水区以及二十一世纪的计算机模型,该模型绘制了河谷的水文图,为决策提供了数据。外界对山谷的威胁,如国家干预或城市饥渴,使圣路易斯山谷的居民团结起来,共同解决问题。格兰德河上游的水资源开发仍然具有现实意义。当前面临的挑战包括干旱频发、气候变化以及科罗拉多州城市对水资源的迫切需求。大都市前沿地带有钱买水,也有愿意卖水的人,但监管水资源的机构却不愿意买水。
Water and Agriculture in Colorado and the American West: First in Line for the Rio Grande by David Stiller (review)
Reviewed by:
Water and Agriculture in Colorado and the American West: First in Line for the Rio Grande by David Stiller
Amahia Mallea (bio)
Water and Agriculture in Colorado and the American West: First in Line for the Rio Grande By David Stiller. Reno: University of Nevada Press, 2021. Pp. 188.
The focus of Water and Agriculture in Colorado and the American West is the San Luis Valley in southern Colorado. The valley is bounded by the San Juan and Sangre de Cristo Mountains, and the seasonal snowmelt forms the upper Rio Grande River, which greens this intensely irrigated valley.
The Colorado Doctrine of water law that developed in the mid-nineteenth century, first with mining and then with agriculture, became the prior appropriation water law that now governs this valley and the U.S. West. The law is often summarized as "first in time, first in right," and it allows water to be controlled by private interests, despite being a valuable public resource.
Environmental historian David Stiller's perspective on water is shaped by his personal experience as an "irrigator"—an identity differentiated from a landowner and conveying a more specific set of challenges than "farmer." Stiller seeks to build empathy for the irrigator and to enumerate the insecurities faced by rural agricultural communities dependent on overpromised water resources in a time of drought, population growth, and climate change. Stiller doesn't sugarcoat the economic and environmental challenges; he acknowledges that the San Luis Valley, like the arid West, has a mismatch between expectations and reality that is historically rooted.
Adding to the history of western water and land use—like Donald Worster's classic Rivers of Empire (1992)—this monograph draws attention to the Rio Grande, instead of the oft-discussed Colorado River. Although the back-of-the-book summary highlights the Indigenous Utes and the Hispanos (Spanish settlers in the 1850s who used community-based irrigation called acequias), the author does not say much about the process of dispossession. The text is focused on the Anglo-American farmers who arrived after the U.S. Civil War and who continue to dominate the valley today. More attention to the legacy, culture, and management of acequias would have further differentiated the Rio Grande and presented historical alternatives for organizing and operating water systems.
Stiller connects irrigation technologies to resource exploitation that harmed communities. Four main canals were in place by the 1880s, initiating the first era of unsustainable development in the San Luis Valley. This canal-building boom and "bonanza farming" (p. 37) left the Rio Grande dry [End Page 722] for downstream users in New Mexico, Texas, and Mexico. Earthen dams upstream, and the Elephant Butte Dam downstream, sought to address water limitations and inequity. Flood (as opposed to furrow) irrigators raised the water table in the San Luis Valley, allowing for junior water right holders to access well water. Basically, irrigators redirected the river and created an aquifer in the valley. Postwar well drilling was largely unregulated, and by the 1970s, a wildcat era of pumping, center-pivot irrigation was common. Though center pivot was more efficient, it was "a double-edged sword" (p. 85); the number of junior water rights holders bypassing prior appropriation increased productivity and further taxed resources. Additionally, starting in the early twentieth century, the extensive subirrigation resulted in soil salinity that damaged farmland.
The boom and bust of innovation followed by resource exploitation has not created stability for agricultural communities. Stiller concludes that "only innovative thinking attained a limited degree of equanimity" (p. 122), by which he refers to the collaborative efforts of irrigationists, conservationists, and regulators. These include the 1938 Rio Grande Compact, water districts, and a twenty-first-century computer model mapping the valley's hydrology, which created data for decision-making. Outside menaces to the valley—like state intervention or urban thirst—have united San Luis Valley residents to address problems cooperatively.
This development of water resources in the upper Rio Grande remains relevant. Current challenges include recurring droughts, climate change, and the pressing demand for water coming from urban Colorado. The metropolitan Front Range has the money to purchase water, and willing sellers exist, but the regulating water...
期刊介绍:
Technology and Culture, the preeminent journal of the history of technology, draws on scholarship in diverse disciplines to publish insightful pieces intended for general readers as well as specialists. Subscribers include scientists, engineers, anthropologists, sociologists, economists, museum curators, archivists, scholars, librarians, educators, historians, and many others. In addition to scholarly essays, each issue features 30-40 book reviews and reviews of new museum exhibitions. To illuminate important debates and draw attention to specific topics, the journal occasionally publishes thematic issues. Technology and Culture is the official journal of the Society for the History of Technology (SHOT).