雄心勃勃的理想,切合实际的期望:先前在结构上的经验如何通过框架调节第 8 条凭证持有者的目标

IF 0.9 2区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY American Journal of Cultural Sociology Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1057/s41290-024-00208-w
Zawadi Rucks-Ahidiana
{"title":"雄心勃勃的理想,切合实际的期望:先前在结构上的经验如何通过框架调节第 8 条凭证持有者的目标","authors":"Zawadi Rucks-Ahidiana","doi":"10.1057/s41290-024-00208-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A core component of sociological studies of behavior and decision-making is understanding how people navigate their cultural toolkits. In this article, I explain how cultural tools are translated into goals. I argue that structure not only informs the barriers and opportunities people face in pursuing goals, but informs how they evaluate their goals to determine which are worth pursuing through “experiential frames” produced by prior experiences. Using Young’s (The minds of marginalized black men: Making sense of mobility, opportunity, and future life chances, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2004) distinction between ideals (dreams), aspirations (goals with clear courses of action), and expectations (goals with clear courses of action viewed as achievable), I demonstrate this by analyzing the economic mobility goals of 34 Section 8 voucher holders living in New York City and the experiential frames that informed those goals. I find that while most respondents would like to achieve economic upward mobility, they evaluated goals that would reproduce their socio-economic position as aspirations or expectations through their experiential frames with housing, employment, education, and navigating the labor market. The findings contribute theoretically to the sociology of the future and the cultural sociology of goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":45140,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cultural Sociology","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ambitious ideals, realistic expectations: how prior experiences with structures moderate the goals of Section 8 voucher holders through frames\",\"authors\":\"Zawadi Rucks-Ahidiana\",\"doi\":\"10.1057/s41290-024-00208-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A core component of sociological studies of behavior and decision-making is understanding how people navigate their cultural toolkits. In this article, I explain how cultural tools are translated into goals. I argue that structure not only informs the barriers and opportunities people face in pursuing goals, but informs how they evaluate their goals to determine which are worth pursuing through “experiential frames” produced by prior experiences. Using Young’s (The minds of marginalized black men: Making sense of mobility, opportunity, and future life chances, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2004) distinction between ideals (dreams), aspirations (goals with clear courses of action), and expectations (goals with clear courses of action viewed as achievable), I demonstrate this by analyzing the economic mobility goals of 34 Section 8 voucher holders living in New York City and the experiential frames that informed those goals. I find that while most respondents would like to achieve economic upward mobility, they evaluated goals that would reproduce their socio-economic position as aspirations or expectations through their experiential frames with housing, employment, education, and navigating the labor market. The findings contribute theoretically to the sociology of the future and the cultural sociology of goals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Cultural Sociology\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Cultural Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-024-00208-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cultural Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41290-024-00208-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

行为和决策社会学研究的一个核心内容就是了解人们如何驾驭自己的文化工具包。在本文中,我将解释文化工具是如何转化为目标的。我认为,结构不仅会影响人们在追求目标时所面临的障碍和机遇,还会影响他们如何评估目标,从而通过先前经验所产生的 "经验框架 "来确定哪些目标值得追求。利用 Young 的《边缘化黑人男性的思想:普林斯顿大学出版社,普林斯顿,2004 年)对理想(梦想)、抱负(有明确行动方针的目标)和期望(有明确行动方针且被视为可实现的目标)进行了区分,我通过分析居住在纽约市的 34 名第 8 款住房券持有者的经济流动性目标以及实现这些目标的经验框架来证明这一点。我发现,虽然大多数受访者都希望实现经济向上流动,但他们通过住房、就业、教育和劳动力市场的经验框架,将能够重现其社会经济地位的目标评价为愿望或期望。这些发现在理论上有助于未来社会学和目标文化社会学的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ambitious ideals, realistic expectations: how prior experiences with structures moderate the goals of Section 8 voucher holders through frames

A core component of sociological studies of behavior and decision-making is understanding how people navigate their cultural toolkits. In this article, I explain how cultural tools are translated into goals. I argue that structure not only informs the barriers and opportunities people face in pursuing goals, but informs how they evaluate their goals to determine which are worth pursuing through “experiential frames” produced by prior experiences. Using Young’s (The minds of marginalized black men: Making sense of mobility, opportunity, and future life chances, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2004) distinction between ideals (dreams), aspirations (goals with clear courses of action), and expectations (goals with clear courses of action viewed as achievable), I demonstrate this by analyzing the economic mobility goals of 34 Section 8 voucher holders living in New York City and the experiential frames that informed those goals. I find that while most respondents would like to achieve economic upward mobility, they evaluated goals that would reproduce their socio-economic position as aspirations or expectations through their experiential frames with housing, employment, education, and navigating the labor market. The findings contribute theoretically to the sociology of the future and the cultural sociology of goals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: From modernity''s onset, social theorists have been announcing the death of meaning, at the hands of market forces, impersonal power, scientific expertise, and the pervasive forces of rationalization and industrialization. Yet, cultural structures and processes have proved surprisingly resilient. Relatively autonomous patterns of meaning - sweeping narratives and dividing codes, redolent if elusive symbols, fervent demands for purity and cringing fears of pollution - continue to exert extraordinary effects on action and institutions. They affect structures of inequality, racism and marginality, gender and sexuality, crime and punishment, social movements, market success and citizen incorporation. New and old new media project continuous symbolic reconstructions of private and public life. As contemporary sociology registered the continuing robustness of cultural power, the new discipline of cultural sociology was born. How should these complex cultural processes be conceptualized? What are the best empirical ways to study social meaning? Even as debates rage around these field-specific theoretical and methodological questions, a broadly cultural sensibility has spread into every arena of sociological study, illuminating how struggles over meaning affect the most disparate processes of contemporary social life.Bringing together the best of these studies and debates, the American Journal of Cultural Sociology (AJCS) publicly crystallizes the cultural turn in contemporary sociology. By providing a common forum for the many voices engaged in meaning-centered social inquiry, the AJCS will facilitate communication, sharpen contrasts, sustain clarity, and allow for periodic condensation and synthesis of different perspectives. The journal aims to provide a single space where cultural sociologists can follow the latest developments and debates within the field. The American Journal of Cultural Sociology is indexed by SCOPUS, a database listing journals and country scientific indicators and rankings, and is also indexed in Thomson Reuters’ Web of Science Core Collection, in the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI). SSCI provides searchable author abstracts for the leading journals in 55 social science disciplines, with a comprehensive backfile of cited reference data from 1900 to the present. AJCS’s inclusion in the SSCI provides greater discoverability for the journal and allows for real-time insight into the citation performance.We welcome high quality submissions of any length and focus: contemporary and historical studies, macro and micro, institutional and symbolic, ethnographic and statistical, philosophical and methodological. Contemporary cultural sociology has developed from European and American roots, and today is an international field. The AJCS will publish rigorous, meaning-centered sociology whatever its origins and focus, and will distribute it around the world.
期刊最新文献
Theory of society and cultural sociology. Niklas Luhmann and after From heroism to victimhood: Sèvres narrative and trauma of victimization in Turkey Higher education and the transition to adulthood: socioeconomic inequality in college students’ self-narratives Why do states discriminate between refugee groups? Understanding how Syrian and Ukrainian refugees were framed in Germany and Poland Orientalism reimagined: a semantic network analysis of slum tour reviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1