穆斯林资本市场内部和全球同行之间的金融创新:差异的影响

IF 1.9 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Qualitative Research in financial Markets Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1108/qrfm-04-2023-0088
Simon D. Norton
{"title":"穆斯林资本市场内部和全球同行之间的金融创新:差异的影响","authors":"Simon D. Norton","doi":"10.1108/qrfm-04-2023-0088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to investigate the implications for financial innovation and product development of differences between schools of jurisprudence (<em>fiqh</em>) pertaining across regional Muslim markets, and the consequences for global financial institutions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The methodology is qualitative, drawing upon several sources. Firstly, differences in interpretation regarding the economic and moral responsibilities of financial institutions in Islamic and secular contexts. Secondly, contrasting tenets of schools of Islamic jurisprudence regarding the permissibility of products traded intra Muslim markets. Thirdly, characteristics of complex financial instruments traded in global secular markets prior to the credit crisis of 2007–2008.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Differences between Islamic and global secular interpretations regarding responsibilities of financial institutions militate against integrated markets across which products can be seamlessly traded. Global financial institutions should recognise that different Islamic schools of jurisprudence prioritise either legal form or substance of financial products, but not both simultaneously. This should be considered when designing new products for regional Muslim markets.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>Global financial institutions which focus upon the legal (micro) form of new Islamic products should relate in investor prospectuses and marketing materials the extent to which these accommodate Islamic jurisprudence’s equal (macro) concern for public interest or <em>maslahah</em>. This may comprise the reallocation of risk from those unable to bear it to those willing to assume it for a price, reinforcing rather than compromising economic stability.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study evaluates implications for product development and marketing for global financial institutions active in regional Muslim markets across which different Islamic schools of jurisprudence apply.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":45060,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research in financial Markets","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Financial innovation intra Muslim capital markets and inter global counterparts: implications of differences\",\"authors\":\"Simon D. Norton\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/qrfm-04-2023-0088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>This study aims to investigate the implications for financial innovation and product development of differences between schools of jurisprudence (<em>fiqh</em>) pertaining across regional Muslim markets, and the consequences for global financial institutions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>The methodology is qualitative, drawing upon several sources. Firstly, differences in interpretation regarding the economic and moral responsibilities of financial institutions in Islamic and secular contexts. Secondly, contrasting tenets of schools of Islamic jurisprudence regarding the permissibility of products traded intra Muslim markets. Thirdly, characteristics of complex financial instruments traded in global secular markets prior to the credit crisis of 2007–2008.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>Differences between Islamic and global secular interpretations regarding responsibilities of financial institutions militate against integrated markets across which products can be seamlessly traded. Global financial institutions should recognise that different Islamic schools of jurisprudence prioritise either legal form or substance of financial products, but not both simultaneously. This should be considered when designing new products for regional Muslim markets.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>Global financial institutions which focus upon the legal (micro) form of new Islamic products should relate in investor prospectuses and marketing materials the extent to which these accommodate Islamic jurisprudence’s equal (macro) concern for public interest or <em>maslahah</em>. This may comprise the reallocation of risk from those unable to bear it to those willing to assume it for a price, reinforcing rather than compromising economic stability.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This study evaluates implications for product development and marketing for global financial institutions active in regional Muslim markets across which different Islamic schools of jurisprudence apply.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":45060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Qualitative Research in financial Markets\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Qualitative Research in financial Markets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/qrfm-04-2023-0088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research in financial Markets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/qrfm-04-2023-0088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在探讨各地区穆斯林市场的法理学(fiqh)流派之间的差异对金融创新和产品开发的影响,以及对全球金融机构的影响。首先,伊斯兰和世俗背景下对金融机构经济和道德责任的不同解释。其次,伊斯兰法学流派关于穆斯林市场内交易产品允许性的截然不同的信条。第三,2007-2008 年信贷危机之前在全球世俗市场上交易的复杂金融工具的特点。 研究结果伊斯兰教和全球世俗对金融机构责任的解释存在差异,这不利于产品可以无缝交易的一体化市场。全球金融机构应认识到,不同的伊斯兰法学流派要么优先考虑金融产品的法律形式,要么优先考虑金融产品的实质内容,但不能同时考虑两者。在为地区穆斯林市场设计新产品时,应考虑到这一点。实际影响注重新伊斯兰产品的法律(微观)形式的全球金融机构应在投资者招股说明书和营销材料中说明这些产品在多大程度上符合伊斯兰法学对公共利益或 maslahah 的同等(宏观)关注。这可能包括重新分配风险,将无力承担风险者的风险转嫁给愿意承担风险者,从而加强而非损害经济稳定。原创性/价值本研究评估了在适用不同伊斯兰法学流派的地区穆斯林市场上活跃的全球金融机构的产品开发和营销影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Financial innovation intra Muslim capital markets and inter global counterparts: implications of differences

Purpose

This study aims to investigate the implications for financial innovation and product development of differences between schools of jurisprudence (fiqh) pertaining across regional Muslim markets, and the consequences for global financial institutions.

Design/methodology/approach

The methodology is qualitative, drawing upon several sources. Firstly, differences in interpretation regarding the economic and moral responsibilities of financial institutions in Islamic and secular contexts. Secondly, contrasting tenets of schools of Islamic jurisprudence regarding the permissibility of products traded intra Muslim markets. Thirdly, characteristics of complex financial instruments traded in global secular markets prior to the credit crisis of 2007–2008.

Findings

Differences between Islamic and global secular interpretations regarding responsibilities of financial institutions militate against integrated markets across which products can be seamlessly traded. Global financial institutions should recognise that different Islamic schools of jurisprudence prioritise either legal form or substance of financial products, but not both simultaneously. This should be considered when designing new products for regional Muslim markets.

Practical implications

Global financial institutions which focus upon the legal (micro) form of new Islamic products should relate in investor prospectuses and marketing materials the extent to which these accommodate Islamic jurisprudence’s equal (macro) concern for public interest or maslahah. This may comprise the reallocation of risk from those unable to bear it to those willing to assume it for a price, reinforcing rather than compromising economic stability.

Originality/value

This study evaluates implications for product development and marketing for global financial institutions active in regional Muslim markets across which different Islamic schools of jurisprudence apply.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Qualitative Research in Financial Markets is the only peer-reviewed journal dedicated to exploring the rapidly-growing area of research activity in finance that uses qualitative methods. Building on a long pedigree of finance research, the journal publishes international and innovative analyses and novel insights into financial markets worldwide
期刊最新文献
Exploring the potential impact of big data on the collection of sufficient, appropriate audit evidence: insights from auditors in the UAE Determinants inhibiting digital payment system adoption: an Indian perspective Debt advice in Europe: a search of the good practices to fight over-indebtedness A qualitative investigation into financial well-being and social capital of retired government school teachers The implications of Maqasid al-Shari’ah for integrated sustainability practices among businesses: a qualitative inquiry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1