慢性阻塞性肺病疾病焦虑问卷中文版的信度、效度、修订和扩展

XiaoLang Miao, Yanxia Han, Zhenyun Wu, Xiaoliang Jin, Mei'e Niu, Qian Zhao, Xiangmin Lu
{"title":"慢性阻塞性肺病疾病焦虑问卷中文版的信度、效度、修订和扩展","authors":"XiaoLang Miao, Yanxia Han, Zhenyun Wu, Xiaoliang Jin, Mei'e Niu, Qian Zhao, Xiangmin Lu","doi":"10.2147/copd.s455171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Purpose:</strong> To translate a disease-specific anxiety questionnaire on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and test its reliability and validity in China.<br/><strong>Patients and Methods:</strong> The German version of the revised COPD Anxiety Questionnaire (CAF-R) was initially validated using step-by-step translation, back-translation, and cross-cultural adaptation. The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the CAF-R (CAF-R-CN) were tested among 448 patients with COPD (mean age =71.42± 9.33 years, 17.2% female) from four medical institutions in Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, using convenience sampling, from April 2022 to June 2023.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> The CAF-R-CN included six dimensions with a total of 25 items. The item-level content validity index was 0.860– 1.000; the scale-level content validity index was 0.920. The structural validity χ<sup>2</sup>/df was 2.326, the root mean square error of approximation was 0.077, the comparative fit index was 0.924, and the Tucker–Lewis index was 0.912. The six-dimensional internal consistency index Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.696– 0.910, and the test–retest reliability was 0.949. An optimal cut-off score of 50.5 was selected with a sensitivity of 0.786 and specificity of 0.870.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> The CAF-R-CN had satisfactory reliability and validity and can be used to identify and assess anxiety in COPD patients with a Chinese cultural background.<br/><br/><strong>Keywords:</strong> fear, scale, specificity, chronic respiratory disease, Chinese translation, assessment<br/>","PeriodicalId":13792,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability, Validity, Modification and Expansion of the Chinese Version of the Disease-Specific Anxiety Questionnaire for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"authors\":\"XiaoLang Miao, Yanxia Han, Zhenyun Wu, Xiaoliang Jin, Mei'e Niu, Qian Zhao, Xiangmin Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/copd.s455171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong>Purpose:</strong> To translate a disease-specific anxiety questionnaire on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and test its reliability and validity in China.<br/><strong>Patients and Methods:</strong> The German version of the revised COPD Anxiety Questionnaire (CAF-R) was initially validated using step-by-step translation, back-translation, and cross-cultural adaptation. The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the CAF-R (CAF-R-CN) were tested among 448 patients with COPD (mean age =71.42± 9.33 years, 17.2% female) from four medical institutions in Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, using convenience sampling, from April 2022 to June 2023.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> The CAF-R-CN included six dimensions with a total of 25 items. The item-level content validity index was 0.860– 1.000; the scale-level content validity index was 0.920. The structural validity χ<sup>2</sup>/df was 2.326, the root mean square error of approximation was 0.077, the comparative fit index was 0.924, and the Tucker–Lewis index was 0.912. The six-dimensional internal consistency index Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.696– 0.910, and the test–retest reliability was 0.949. An optimal cut-off score of 50.5 was selected with a sensitivity of 0.786 and specificity of 0.870.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> The CAF-R-CN had satisfactory reliability and validity and can be used to identify and assess anxiety in COPD patients with a Chinese cultural background.<br/><br/><strong>Keywords:</strong> fear, scale, specificity, chronic respiratory disease, Chinese translation, assessment<br/>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/copd.s455171\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/copd.s455171","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:翻译慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)特定疾病焦虑问卷,并在中国测试其信度和效度:通过逐步翻译、回译和跨文化适应,初步验证了修订版 COPD 焦虑问卷(CAF-R)的德语版本。2022年4月至2023年6月,采用方便抽样法对江苏省苏州市4家医疗机构的448名慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者(平均年龄=71.42±9.33岁,女性占17.2%)进行了CAF-R(CAF-R-CN)中文版的信度和效度测试:CAF-R-CN包括6个维度,共25个条目。项目水平的内容效度指数为 0.860-1.000;量表水平的内容效度指数为 0.920。结构效度 χ2/df 为 2.326,均方根近似误差为 0.077,比较拟合指数为 0.924,Tucker-Lewis 指数为 0.912。六维内部一致性指数 Cronbach's α 系数为 0.696-0.910,测试-再测信度为 0.949。最佳临界值为 50.5,灵敏度为 0.786,特异度为 0.870:CAF-R-CN具有令人满意的信度和效度,可用于识别和评估具有中国文化背景的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的焦虑情绪。 关键词:恐惧;量表;特异性;慢性呼吸系统疾病;中文翻译;评估
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reliability, Validity, Modification and Expansion of the Chinese Version of the Disease-Specific Anxiety Questionnaire for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Purpose: To translate a disease-specific anxiety questionnaire on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and test its reliability and validity in China.
Patients and Methods: The German version of the revised COPD Anxiety Questionnaire (CAF-R) was initially validated using step-by-step translation, back-translation, and cross-cultural adaptation. The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the CAF-R (CAF-R-CN) were tested among 448 patients with COPD (mean age =71.42± 9.33 years, 17.2% female) from four medical institutions in Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, using convenience sampling, from April 2022 to June 2023.
Results: The CAF-R-CN included six dimensions with a total of 25 items. The item-level content validity index was 0.860– 1.000; the scale-level content validity index was 0.920. The structural validity χ2/df was 2.326, the root mean square error of approximation was 0.077, the comparative fit index was 0.924, and the Tucker–Lewis index was 0.912. The six-dimensional internal consistency index Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.696– 0.910, and the test–retest reliability was 0.949. An optimal cut-off score of 50.5 was selected with a sensitivity of 0.786 and specificity of 0.870.
Conclusion: The CAF-R-CN had satisfactory reliability and validity and can be used to identify and assess anxiety in COPD patients with a Chinese cultural background.

Keywords: fear, scale, specificity, chronic respiratory disease, Chinese translation, assessment
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.70%
发文量
372
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies and reviews in COPD. Special focus will be given to the pathophysiological processes underlying the disease, intervention programs, patient focused education, and self management protocols. This journal is directed at specialists and healthcare professionals
期刊最新文献
A Multi-Specialty Delphi Consensus on Assessing and Managing Cardiopulmonary Risk in Patients with COPD A Network Meta-Analysis of Aerobic, Resistance, Endurance, and High-Intensity Interval Training to Prioritize Exercise for Stable COPD Association Between Systolic Blood Pressure and in-Hospital Mortality Among Congestive Heart Failure Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Cohort Study The Relationship Between Benefit Finding and Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: The Mediating Effects of Self-Management Exploring Gender Differences in the Association Between TyG Index and COPD: A Cross-Sectional Study from NHANES 1999-2018
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1