基于卷积神经网络的色素性皮肤病变(PSL)分类的分析验证(利用未见过的 PSL 高光谱数据进行临床应用

IF 0.8 4区 物理与天体物理 Q3 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of the Korean Physical Society Pub Date : 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1007/s40042-024-01069-9
Eun Jeong Heo, Chun Gun Park, Kyung Hwan Chang, Jang Bo Shim, Soo Hong Seo, Dai Hyun Kim, Song Heui Cho, Chul Yong Kim, Nam Kwon Lee, Suk Lee
{"title":"基于卷积神经网络的色素性皮肤病变(PSL)分类的分析验证(利用未见过的 PSL 高光谱数据进行临床应用","authors":"Eun Jeong Heo,&nbsp;Chun Gun Park,&nbsp;Kyung Hwan Chang,&nbsp;Jang Bo Shim,&nbsp;Soo Hong Seo,&nbsp;Dai Hyun Kim,&nbsp;Song Heui Cho,&nbsp;Chul Yong Kim,&nbsp;Nam Kwon Lee,&nbsp;Suk Lee","doi":"10.1007/s40042-024-01069-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, we aimed not only to analyze model performance of the convolutional neural network (CNN)-based pigmented skin lesion (PSL) classification, but also analyze the analytic validation of the CNN-based PSL classification using unseen PSL hyperspectral dataset with an FNR. To this end, 38 hyperspectral imaging (HSI) data samples were obtained from 19 patients diagnosed with PSLs based on biopsy results. The analytic validation dataset comprised both seen and unseen PSL datasets. The seen PSL dataset included 272,677 pixels from 32 HSI data samples, and the unseen PSL dataset included 370,820 pixels from 38 HSI data samples. A snapshot-based hyperspectral camera captured the spectral (2048 × 2048 pixels) and spatial (150 spectral bands, 470–900 nm) data. A dermatologist labeled the acquired HSI data as pigmented basal cell carcinoma (BCC), melanoma, and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) to obtain hyperspectral data for each PSL class in software. A confusion matrix and specific performance metrics were used to evaluate CNN-based PSL classification performance. The false negative ratio (FNR) for melanoma were 0.0284 ± 0.0051 and 0.4317 ± 0.0269 for seen and unseen PSL dataset, respectively. Furthermore, 49.14% of the unseen SCC hyperspectral data was predicted as BCC. We confirmed unseen SCC hyperspectral data was most commonly confused for BCC. Therefore, we confirmed the feasibility of analytic validation of the CNN-based PSL classification using unseen PSL hyperspectral dataset for clinical applications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Physical Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analytic validation of convolutional neural network-based classification of pigmented skin lesions (PSLs) using unseen PSL hyperspectral data for clinical applications\",\"authors\":\"Eun Jeong Heo,&nbsp;Chun Gun Park,&nbsp;Kyung Hwan Chang,&nbsp;Jang Bo Shim,&nbsp;Soo Hong Seo,&nbsp;Dai Hyun Kim,&nbsp;Song Heui Cho,&nbsp;Chul Yong Kim,&nbsp;Nam Kwon Lee,&nbsp;Suk Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40042-024-01069-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this study, we aimed not only to analyze model performance of the convolutional neural network (CNN)-based pigmented skin lesion (PSL) classification, but also analyze the analytic validation of the CNN-based PSL classification using unseen PSL hyperspectral dataset with an FNR. To this end, 38 hyperspectral imaging (HSI) data samples were obtained from 19 patients diagnosed with PSLs based on biopsy results. The analytic validation dataset comprised both seen and unseen PSL datasets. The seen PSL dataset included 272,677 pixels from 32 HSI data samples, and the unseen PSL dataset included 370,820 pixels from 38 HSI data samples. A snapshot-based hyperspectral camera captured the spectral (2048 × 2048 pixels) and spatial (150 spectral bands, 470–900 nm) data. A dermatologist labeled the acquired HSI data as pigmented basal cell carcinoma (BCC), melanoma, and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) to obtain hyperspectral data for each PSL class in software. A confusion matrix and specific performance metrics were used to evaluate CNN-based PSL classification performance. The false negative ratio (FNR) for melanoma were 0.0284 ± 0.0051 and 0.4317 ± 0.0269 for seen and unseen PSL dataset, respectively. Furthermore, 49.14% of the unseen SCC hyperspectral data was predicted as BCC. We confirmed unseen SCC hyperspectral data was most commonly confused for BCC. Therefore, we confirmed the feasibility of analytic validation of the CNN-based PSL classification using unseen PSL hyperspectral dataset for clinical applications.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Physical Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Physical Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40042-024-01069-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Physical Society","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40042-024-01069-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本研究中,我们不仅要分析基于卷积神经网络(CNN)的色素性皮肤病变(PSL)分类的模型性能,还要使用未见过的具有 FNR 的 PSL 高光谱数据集分析验证基于 CNN 的 PSL 分类。为此,我们从 19 名根据活检结果确诊为 PSL 的患者处获得了 38 个高光谱成像(HSI)数据样本。分析验证数据集包括已见和未见 PSL 数据集。看到的 PSL 数据集包括来自 32 个 HSI 数据样本的 272,677 个像素,未看到的 PSL 数据集包括来自 38 个 HSI 数据样本的 370,820 个像素。一台快照式高光谱相机采集了光谱(2048 × 2048 像素)和空间(150 个光谱带,470-900 纳米)数据。皮肤科医生将获取的 HSI 数据标记为色素性基底细胞癌(BCC)、黑色素瘤和鳞状细胞癌(SCC),从而在软件中获得每个 PSL 类别的高光谱数据。混淆矩阵和特定性能指标用于评估基于 CNN 的 PSL 分类性能。在看到和未看到的 PSL 数据集中,黑色素瘤的假阴性比率(FNR)分别为 0.0284 ± 0.0051 和 0.4317 ± 0.0269。此外,49.14% 的未见 SCC 高光谱数据被预测为 BCC。我们证实,未见的 SCC 高光谱数据最常被混淆为 BCC。因此,我们证实了使用未见的 PSL 高光谱数据集对基于 CNN 的 PSL 分类进行临床应用分析验证的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analytic validation of convolutional neural network-based classification of pigmented skin lesions (PSLs) using unseen PSL hyperspectral data for clinical applications

In this study, we aimed not only to analyze model performance of the convolutional neural network (CNN)-based pigmented skin lesion (PSL) classification, but also analyze the analytic validation of the CNN-based PSL classification using unseen PSL hyperspectral dataset with an FNR. To this end, 38 hyperspectral imaging (HSI) data samples were obtained from 19 patients diagnosed with PSLs based on biopsy results. The analytic validation dataset comprised both seen and unseen PSL datasets. The seen PSL dataset included 272,677 pixels from 32 HSI data samples, and the unseen PSL dataset included 370,820 pixels from 38 HSI data samples. A snapshot-based hyperspectral camera captured the spectral (2048 × 2048 pixels) and spatial (150 spectral bands, 470–900 nm) data. A dermatologist labeled the acquired HSI data as pigmented basal cell carcinoma (BCC), melanoma, and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) to obtain hyperspectral data for each PSL class in software. A confusion matrix and specific performance metrics were used to evaluate CNN-based PSL classification performance. The false negative ratio (FNR) for melanoma were 0.0284 ± 0.0051 and 0.4317 ± 0.0269 for seen and unseen PSL dataset, respectively. Furthermore, 49.14% of the unseen SCC hyperspectral data was predicted as BCC. We confirmed unseen SCC hyperspectral data was most commonly confused for BCC. Therefore, we confirmed the feasibility of analytic validation of the CNN-based PSL classification using unseen PSL hyperspectral dataset for clinical applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Korean Physical Society
Journal of the Korean Physical Society PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
276
审稿时长
5.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Korean Physical Society (JKPS) covers all fields of physics spanning from statistical physics and condensed matter physics to particle physics. The manuscript to be published in JKPS is required to hold the originality, significance, and recent completeness. The journal is composed of Full paper, Letters, and Brief sections. In addition, featured articles with outstanding results are selected by the Editorial board and introduced in the online version. For emphasis on aspect of international journal, several world-distinguished researchers join the Editorial board. High quality of papers may be express-published when it is recommended or requested.
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Comparative analysis of single and triple material 10 nm Tri-gate FinFET Revisit to the fluid Love numbers and the permanent tide of the Earth Dictionary learning-based denoising algorithm with expected patch log likelihood in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance image Synthesis and characterization of Fe-doped ZnO films for enhanced NO2 gas-sensing applications Quantum discord in the early universe with non-trivial sound speed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1