{"title":"美国的博士前期正畸教育:Z 世代学习者面临的挑战和机遇","authors":"","doi":"10.1053/j.sodo.2024.04.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This perspective paper addresses the current landscape of predoctoral orthodontic education in the United States. A history of American Dental Education Association (ADEA) senior dental student exit surveys consistently reveals that graduates lack confidence in space management and malocclusion. The authors, with over 50 years of combined experience in dental education, present variations in predoctoral orthodontics programs, common challenges, and underscore the need for aligning curricula with the distinct characteristics of the current Gen Z student cohort. Variations include instructional clock hours, timing and sequence, and instructor qualification. An examination of the topics covered in predoctoral orthodontics demonstrates stability from the 1993 ADEA guidelines to a 2021 consensus panel's recommendations. Specific examples stemming from the direct experiences of the authors demonstrate the variety of approaches used in predoctoral orthodontic education. Challenges in predoctoral education stem from not distinguishing curricular goals from Advanced Education in Orthodontics, or clearly defining parameters for competence. Training dental students to treat malocclusion is not practical or possible within the present dental curriculum. The authors stress the importance of shifting educational goals towards competency training in recognizing, diagnosing, and managing malocclusion, to increase relevance to general dental clinical practice. The paper highlights innovative teaching strategies to engage students in competency-based learning: Problem Based Learning, Gamification, Case-based learning, Cold calling, Test enhanced Learning, Spiral Curriculum. The paper also presents educational technological applications used in traditional classrooms or remote environments for teaching and assessment, well suited for Gen Z's preference for technologically driven interactive learning methods. Despite its challenges, predoctoral orthodontics education in the United States is filled with opportunities for growth, which will only lead to elevating the standard of dental care for all patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48688,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Orthodontics","volume":"30 4","pages":"Pages 409-412"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1073874624000483/pdfft?md5=8a7d32695486745b73383aa8f1767e8e&pid=1-s2.0-S1073874624000483-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predoctoral orthodontic education in the United States: Challenges and opportunities for generation Z learners\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.sodo.2024.04.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This perspective paper addresses the current landscape of predoctoral orthodontic education in the United States. A history of American Dental Education Association (ADEA) senior dental student exit surveys consistently reveals that graduates lack confidence in space management and malocclusion. The authors, with over 50 years of combined experience in dental education, present variations in predoctoral orthodontics programs, common challenges, and underscore the need for aligning curricula with the distinct characteristics of the current Gen Z student cohort. Variations include instructional clock hours, timing and sequence, and instructor qualification. An examination of the topics covered in predoctoral orthodontics demonstrates stability from the 1993 ADEA guidelines to a 2021 consensus panel's recommendations. Specific examples stemming from the direct experiences of the authors demonstrate the variety of approaches used in predoctoral orthodontic education. Challenges in predoctoral education stem from not distinguishing curricular goals from Advanced Education in Orthodontics, or clearly defining parameters for competence. Training dental students to treat malocclusion is not practical or possible within the present dental curriculum. The authors stress the importance of shifting educational goals towards competency training in recognizing, diagnosing, and managing malocclusion, to increase relevance to general dental clinical practice. The paper highlights innovative teaching strategies to engage students in competency-based learning: Problem Based Learning, Gamification, Case-based learning, Cold calling, Test enhanced Learning, Spiral Curriculum. The paper also presents educational technological applications used in traditional classrooms or remote environments for teaching and assessment, well suited for Gen Z's preference for technologically driven interactive learning methods. Despite its challenges, predoctoral orthodontics education in the United States is filled with opportunities for growth, which will only lead to elevating the standard of dental care for all patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"30 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 409-412\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1073874624000483/pdfft?md5=8a7d32695486745b73383aa8f1767e8e&pid=1-s2.0-S1073874624000483-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1073874624000483\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1073874624000483","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这篇视角论文探讨了美国目前的博士前期正畸教育现状。美国牙科教育协会(American Dental Education Association,ADEA)对高年级牙科学生的毕业调查结果显示,毕业生对空间管理和错合畸形缺乏信心。作者在牙科教育方面拥有 50 多年的综合经验,他们介绍了博士前期正畸课程的差异、共同面临的挑战,并强调了根据当前 Z 世代学生群体的显著特征调整课程的必要性。差异包括教学时数、时间和顺序以及教师资格。从 1993 年 ADEA 指南到 2021 年共识小组的建议,对正畸学博士前期课程所涵盖主题的研究显示了其稳定性。源自作者直接经验的具体实例展示了正畸学博士前期教育中使用的各种方法。博士前期教育的挑战来自于没有将课程目标与口腔正畸高级教育区分开来,或者没有明确定义能力参数。在目前的牙科课程中,培训牙科学生治疗错颌畸形是不切实际的,也是不可能的。作者强调了将教育目标转向识别、诊断和管理错颌畸形的能力培训的重要性,以增加与普通牙科临床实践的相关性。论文重点介绍了让学生参与能力本位学习的创新教学策略:基于问题的学习、游戏化、基于病例的学习、冷处理、测试强化学习、螺旋式课程。论文还介绍了在传统教室或远程环境中用于教学和评估的教育技术应用,非常适合 Z 世代对技术驱动型互动学习方法的偏好。尽管面临挑战,但美国的博士前期正畸教育充满了发展机遇,这只会提高所有患者的牙科治疗水平。
Predoctoral orthodontic education in the United States: Challenges and opportunities for generation Z learners
This perspective paper addresses the current landscape of predoctoral orthodontic education in the United States. A history of American Dental Education Association (ADEA) senior dental student exit surveys consistently reveals that graduates lack confidence in space management and malocclusion. The authors, with over 50 years of combined experience in dental education, present variations in predoctoral orthodontics programs, common challenges, and underscore the need for aligning curricula with the distinct characteristics of the current Gen Z student cohort. Variations include instructional clock hours, timing and sequence, and instructor qualification. An examination of the topics covered in predoctoral orthodontics demonstrates stability from the 1993 ADEA guidelines to a 2021 consensus panel's recommendations. Specific examples stemming from the direct experiences of the authors demonstrate the variety of approaches used in predoctoral orthodontic education. Challenges in predoctoral education stem from not distinguishing curricular goals from Advanced Education in Orthodontics, or clearly defining parameters for competence. Training dental students to treat malocclusion is not practical or possible within the present dental curriculum. The authors stress the importance of shifting educational goals towards competency training in recognizing, diagnosing, and managing malocclusion, to increase relevance to general dental clinical practice. The paper highlights innovative teaching strategies to engage students in competency-based learning: Problem Based Learning, Gamification, Case-based learning, Cold calling, Test enhanced Learning, Spiral Curriculum. The paper also presents educational technological applications used in traditional classrooms or remote environments for teaching and assessment, well suited for Gen Z's preference for technologically driven interactive learning methods. Despite its challenges, predoctoral orthodontics education in the United States is filled with opportunities for growth, which will only lead to elevating the standard of dental care for all patients.
期刊介绍:
Each issue provides up-to-date, state-of-the-art information on a single topic in orthodontics. Readers are kept abreast of the latest innovations, research findings, clinical applications and clinical methods. Collection of the issues will provide invaluable reference material for present and future review.