隧道设计和施工过程的理论半定量风险评估方法

IF 1.6 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Pub Date : 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1007/s13198-024-02348-1
Ozgur Satici, Esra Satici
{"title":"隧道设计和施工过程的理论半定量风险评估方法","authors":"Ozgur Satici, Esra Satici","doi":"10.1007/s13198-024-02348-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>All engineering projects involve risk management applications. Sometimes, risks cannot be effectively managed, leading to catastrophic consequences. Engineers must consciously or unconsciously manage these risks. Regardless of how risks are handled, project risks need to be systematically evaluated. Therefore, risk management procedures must be implemented in every project, particularly in geo-engineering projects, to mitigate undesirable consequences and achieve project objectives. However, the use of risk management procedures in underground excavation projects is not common. Numerous commonly employed underground excavation techniques lack assessment of risks, notably geotechnical risks. Most of them only evaluate rock structures and excavation stability in accordance with the geological structure. This paper combines a universal risk management perspective with the underground engineering discipline. The tunnel engineering design and construction steps were evaluated for uncertainties using Scenario Structuring Modeling techniques to identify both technical and non-technical risks associated with underground excavation. Bayesian Network models were employed to identify connections that contribute to risk. To achieve this, objective and quantitative risk assessment tables have been devised using risk management philosophy, in accordance with tunnel design engineering principles and Turkish procurement laws. The primary objective of this study is to increase awareness of the use of risk management processes in tunnel construction projects and introduce a systematic approach to risk assessment in tunnel engineering projects. As a result, a semi-quantitative risk assessment method based on risk management philosophy is proposed for tunnel design and construction for the first time, evaluating not only geotechnical and engineering risks but also human, financial, and various other sources of risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":14463,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theoretical semi-quantitative risk assessment methodology for tunnel design and construction processes\",\"authors\":\"Ozgur Satici, Esra Satici\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13198-024-02348-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>All engineering projects involve risk management applications. Sometimes, risks cannot be effectively managed, leading to catastrophic consequences. Engineers must consciously or unconsciously manage these risks. Regardless of how risks are handled, project risks need to be systematically evaluated. Therefore, risk management procedures must be implemented in every project, particularly in geo-engineering projects, to mitigate undesirable consequences and achieve project objectives. However, the use of risk management procedures in underground excavation projects is not common. Numerous commonly employed underground excavation techniques lack assessment of risks, notably geotechnical risks. Most of them only evaluate rock structures and excavation stability in accordance with the geological structure. This paper combines a universal risk management perspective with the underground engineering discipline. The tunnel engineering design and construction steps were evaluated for uncertainties using Scenario Structuring Modeling techniques to identify both technical and non-technical risks associated with underground excavation. Bayesian Network models were employed to identify connections that contribute to risk. To achieve this, objective and quantitative risk assessment tables have been devised using risk management philosophy, in accordance with tunnel design engineering principles and Turkish procurement laws. The primary objective of this study is to increase awareness of the use of risk management processes in tunnel construction projects and introduce a systematic approach to risk assessment in tunnel engineering projects. As a result, a semi-quantitative risk assessment method based on risk management philosophy is proposed for tunnel design and construction for the first time, evaluating not only geotechnical and engineering risks but also human, financial, and various other sources of risks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-024-02348-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-024-02348-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

所有工程项目都涉及风险管理应用。有时,风险无法得到有效管理,从而导致灾难性后果。工程师必须有意识或无意识地管理这些风险。不管如何处理风险,都需要对项目风险进行系统评估。因此,每个项目,特别是地质工程项目,都必须实施风险管理程序,以减轻不良后果,实现项目目标。然而,风险管理程序在地下挖掘工程中的应用并不普遍。许多常用的地下挖掘技术缺乏风险评估,特别是岩土工程风险评估。它们大多只根据地质结构评估岩石结构和挖掘稳定性。本文将普遍风险管理视角与地下工程学科相结合。利用情景结构建模技术对隧道工程设计和施工步骤的不确定性进行了评估,以识别与地下开挖相关的技术风险和非技术风险。贝叶斯网络模型被用来识别导致风险的关联。为此,根据隧道设计工程原则和土耳其采购法,采用风险管理理念设计了客观、定量的风险评估表。本研究的主要目的是提高隧道建设项目中使用风险管理流程的意识,并在隧道工程项目中引入系统的风险评估方法。因此,首次为隧道设计和施工提出了基于风险管理理念的半定量风险评估方法,不仅评估岩土工程风险,还评估人力、财务和其他各种风险来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Theoretical semi-quantitative risk assessment methodology for tunnel design and construction processes

All engineering projects involve risk management applications. Sometimes, risks cannot be effectively managed, leading to catastrophic consequences. Engineers must consciously or unconsciously manage these risks. Regardless of how risks are handled, project risks need to be systematically evaluated. Therefore, risk management procedures must be implemented in every project, particularly in geo-engineering projects, to mitigate undesirable consequences and achieve project objectives. However, the use of risk management procedures in underground excavation projects is not common. Numerous commonly employed underground excavation techniques lack assessment of risks, notably geotechnical risks. Most of them only evaluate rock structures and excavation stability in accordance with the geological structure. This paper combines a universal risk management perspective with the underground engineering discipline. The tunnel engineering design and construction steps were evaluated for uncertainties using Scenario Structuring Modeling techniques to identify both technical and non-technical risks associated with underground excavation. Bayesian Network models were employed to identify connections that contribute to risk. To achieve this, objective and quantitative risk assessment tables have been devised using risk management philosophy, in accordance with tunnel design engineering principles and Turkish procurement laws. The primary objective of this study is to increase awareness of the use of risk management processes in tunnel construction projects and introduce a systematic approach to risk assessment in tunnel engineering projects. As a result, a semi-quantitative risk assessment method based on risk management philosophy is proposed for tunnel design and construction for the first time, evaluating not only geotechnical and engineering risks but also human, financial, and various other sources of risks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: This Journal is established with a view to cater to increased awareness for high quality research in the seamless integration of heterogeneous technologies to formulate bankable solutions to the emergent complex engineering problems. Assurance engineering could be thought of as relating to the provision of higher confidence in the reliable and secure implementation of a system’s critical characteristic features through the espousal of a holistic approach by using a wide variety of cross disciplinary tools and techniques. Successful realization of sustainable and dependable products, systems and services involves an extensive adoption of Reliability, Quality, Safety and Risk related procedures for achieving high assurancelevels of performance; also pivotal are the management issues related to risk and uncertainty that govern the practical constraints encountered in their deployment. It is our intention to provide a platform for the modeling and analysis of large engineering systems, among the other aforementioned allied goals of systems assurance engineering, leading to the enforcement of performance enhancement measures. Achieving a fine balance between theory and practice is the primary focus. The Journal only publishes high quality papers that have passed the rigorous peer review procedure of an archival scientific Journal. The aim is an increasing number of submissions, wide circulation and a high impact factor.
期刊最新文献
A generalized product adoption model under random marketing conditions Assessing e-learning platforms in higher education with reference to student satisfaction: a PLS-SEM approach WON: A hypothetical multi-hop ad-hoc wireless ultra-large scale worldwide one network Deep learning for fault diagnosis of monoblock centrifugal pumps: a Hilbert–Huang transform approach Identification of rice crop diseases using gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) and Neuro-GA classifier
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1