加强监管?比较爱尔兰最初的游说立法和修订后的游说立法

IF 0.5 Q4 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Administration Pub Date : 2024-05-11 DOI:10.2478/admin-2024-0009
John Hogan
{"title":"加强监管?比较爱尔兰最初的游说立法和修订后的游说立法","authors":"John Hogan","doi":"10.2478/admin-2024-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares the amendments introduced by the Regulation of Lobbying and Oireachtas (Allowances to Members) (Amendment) Act 2023 with the original regulations of the Regulation of Lobbying Act 2015. The study was conducted using the Hired Guns Method for assessing the robustness of lobbying legislation, developed by the Centre for Public Integrity (CPI), allowing findings to be compared with lobbying regulations internationally. The 2015 legislation was introduced after years of tribunals, scandals, unfulfilled political promises, and economic crisis, in an effort to increase the public’s trust in politicians, representative institutions, democracy and the wider bureaucracy. The 2023 Amendment came in the wake of a 2020 lobbying scandal. The paper finds that, despite the CPI score remaining unchanged, in-depth examination of the legislation showed that the amendment introduced more rules and sanctions, particularly in relation to designated public officials, and closed off outstanding legislative loopholes.","PeriodicalId":41890,"journal":{"name":"Administration","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulating more? Comparing Ireland’s original and amended lobbying legislation\",\"authors\":\"John Hogan\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/admin-2024-0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper compares the amendments introduced by the Regulation of Lobbying and Oireachtas (Allowances to Members) (Amendment) Act 2023 with the original regulations of the Regulation of Lobbying Act 2015. The study was conducted using the Hired Guns Method for assessing the robustness of lobbying legislation, developed by the Centre for Public Integrity (CPI), allowing findings to be compared with lobbying regulations internationally. The 2015 legislation was introduced after years of tribunals, scandals, unfulfilled political promises, and economic crisis, in an effort to increase the public’s trust in politicians, representative institutions, democracy and the wider bureaucracy. The 2023 Amendment came in the wake of a 2020 lobbying scandal. The paper finds that, despite the CPI score remaining unchanged, in-depth examination of the legislation showed that the amendment introduced more rules and sanctions, particularly in relation to designated public officials, and closed off outstanding legislative loopholes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Administration\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/admin-2024-0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/admin-2024-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对《2023 年游说和议会(议员津贴)管理法(修正案)》所引入的修正案与《2015 年游说管理法》的原始法规进行了比较。研究采用了公共廉政中心(CPI)开发的 "雇佣枪手法"(Hired Guns Method)来评估游说立法的稳健性,从而将研究结果与国际游说法规进行比较。在经历了多年的法庭、丑闻、未兑现的政治承诺和经济危机之后,2015年立法出台,旨在提高公众对政治家、代议机构、民主和更广泛的官僚机构的信任。2023 年修正案是在 2020 年的游说丑闻之后出台的。本文发现,尽管 CPI 分数保持不变,但对立法的深入研究表明,修正案引入了更多规则和制裁措施,特别是与指定公职人员有关的规则和制裁措施,并堵塞了悬而未决的立法漏洞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Regulating more? Comparing Ireland’s original and amended lobbying legislation
This paper compares the amendments introduced by the Regulation of Lobbying and Oireachtas (Allowances to Members) (Amendment) Act 2023 with the original regulations of the Regulation of Lobbying Act 2015. The study was conducted using the Hired Guns Method for assessing the robustness of lobbying legislation, developed by the Centre for Public Integrity (CPI), allowing findings to be compared with lobbying regulations internationally. The 2015 legislation was introduced after years of tribunals, scandals, unfulfilled political promises, and economic crisis, in an effort to increase the public’s trust in politicians, representative institutions, democracy and the wider bureaucracy. The 2023 Amendment came in the wake of a 2020 lobbying scandal. The paper finds that, despite the CPI score remaining unchanged, in-depth examination of the legislation showed that the amendment introduced more rules and sanctions, particularly in relation to designated public officials, and closed off outstanding legislative loopholes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Administration
Administration PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Administration is the peer-reviewed journal of the Institute of Public Administration of Ireland. It has been published quarterly since 1953. As the principal journal concerned with Irish public administration and its development, it seeks to combine original scholarship on public administration from a variety of disciplines with the insights and experiences of practitioners. In addition to research articles, which are double blind peer reviewed, the journal welcomes comments on articles, opinion pieces, letters, notices, reports and reviews.
期刊最新文献
Social care work and social work in Ireland: a comparative analysis of standards of proficiency ‘Shall I compare thee?’ Evaluating Finance Ministers Regulating more? Comparing Ireland’s original and amended lobbying legislation Social care managers’ perspectives on statutory registration of social care workers in Ireland Housing and the West Cork islands: a national crisis in microcosm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1