Wissen im Fluss:Der lateinamerikanische Staudammbau im 20.Jahrhundert als globale Wissensgeschichte [Knowledge in flux:弗雷德里克-舒尔茨(Frederik Schulze)著:《流动中的知识:作为全球知识史的二十世纪拉丁美洲水坝建设》(评论)
{"title":"Wissen im Fluss:Der lateinamerikanische Staudammbau im 20.Jahrhundert als globale Wissensgeschichte [Knowledge in flux:弗雷德里克-舒尔茨(Frederik Schulze)著:《流动中的知识:作为全球知识史的二十世纪拉丁美洲水坝建设》(评论)","authors":"Teresa Huhle","doi":"10.1353/tech.2024.a926331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Wissen im Fluss: Der lateinamerikanische Staudammbau im 20. Jahrhundert als globale Wissensgeschichte [Knowledge in flux: Latin American dam construction in the twentieth century as a global history of knowledge]</em> by Frederik Schulze <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Teresa Huhle (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Wissen im Fluss: Der lateinamerikanische Staudammbau im 20. Jahrhundert als globale Wissensgeschichte [Knowledge in flux: Latin American dam construction in the twentieth century as a global history of knowledge]</em> By Frederik Schulze. Paderborn: Brill Schöningh, 2022. Pp. 515. <p>The scales of this book match its topic. Frederik Schulze's <em>Wissen im Fluss</em>, on the planning and construction of large dams in Latin America, is voluminous in pages, extensive in bibliography and sources, broad in its temporal and geographical scope—spanning the whole twentieth century with case studies from Uruguay, Mexico, Venezuela, and Brazil—and profound in its analysis. Thanks to its superb organization, coherent narrative, and masterly contextualization, it also makes for a very good read.</p> <p>Comprised as a history of knowledge, Frederik Schulze sets out to show the central role of Latin America in the production and application of the technological knowledge that was at play in the state-driven planning and construction of large dams and the infrastructures attached to them. Water engineering, he convincingly argues, was a domain of notable Latin American agency throughout the twentieth century. Engineers and other experts from the area produced, adapted, and exported technological knowledge, while politicians skillfully played foreign firms and investors against each other.</p> <p>Existing literature on the history of dams, Schulze assesses, has neglected the topics of transfer of knowledge and global interactions. Scholars on Latin America and elsewhere have critiqued dams as \"large projects intoxicated with modernization\" (pp. xxviii–xxix) and have focused on the environmental damage they cause, but Schulze tells us these scholars have neglected the global processes of knowledge production. He vehemently opposes what he refers to as a victimizing perspective on the Global South and presents <strong>[End Page 695]</strong> convincing arguments and evidence against such approaches. Latin America, for one, created centers of technological knowledge of its own, he shows. The unpredictability of nature, he further illustrates, made it impossible to create stable knowledge on dams, and this precarity opened spaces of contestation for local technicians and politicians.</p> <p>His journey starts in Uruguay (Rincón del Bonete Dam, 1904–48), continues to Mexico (Miguel Alemán Dam, 1944–60) and Venezuela (Guri Dam, 1949–86), and ends in Brazil (Tucuruí Dam, 1973–84). Beyond the geographical voyage, the book also moves through development ideas in Latin America's twentieth century. It starts with the construction of a dam for the singular purpose of the production of electricity (Uruguay), continues with a dam's embeddedness in TVA-style regional development planning (Mexico), then moves to the Cold War context of industrialization and economic planning (Venezuela), and finishes with a project that symbolized technological independence from the North while being heavily contested for its social and ecological consequences (Brazil). Importantly, all four chapters end with a conclusion that places the national cases in a broader Latin American perspective at their respective moments in time. Each of these case studies would merit a review of their own.</p> <p>All the cases substantially add to Schulze's argument that Latin American nation-states, technocrats, and private businesses were confident producers and applicants of technological knowledge, who could compete and self-consciously negotiate with their European and North American partners. Not surprisingly, among the producers of knowledge, engineers played a particularly important role, and Schulze elaborates on their training and professionalization in all the countries under study. Engineers, however, are by far not the only characters who appear in Schulze's story. Politicians, diplomats, entrepreneurs, and anthropologists—to name but a few—also figure prominently. And despite the focus on knowledge production, the book also expands on cultural dimensions and the nation-building function of the dams. More often than not, Schulze shows, dam construction came with a civilizing mission targeted at the rivers that were to be \"tamed,\" but also at the environments and populations surrounding them. It is a special strength of the book that while always adding to its line of argumentation, it also allows for many small stories...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wissen im Fluss: Der lateinamerikanische Staudammbau im 20. Jahrhundert als globale Wissensgeschichte [Knowledge in flux: Latin American dam construction in the twentieth century as a global history of knowledge] by Frederik Schulze (review)\",\"authors\":\"Teresa Huhle\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/tech.2024.a926331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Wissen im Fluss: Der lateinamerikanische Staudammbau im 20. Jahrhundert als globale Wissensgeschichte [Knowledge in flux: Latin American dam construction in the twentieth century as a global history of knowledge]</em> by Frederik Schulze <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Teresa Huhle (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Wissen im Fluss: Der lateinamerikanische Staudammbau im 20. Jahrhundert als globale Wissensgeschichte [Knowledge in flux: Latin American dam construction in the twentieth century as a global history of knowledge]</em> By Frederik Schulze. Paderborn: Brill Schöningh, 2022. Pp. 515. <p>The scales of this book match its topic. Frederik Schulze's <em>Wissen im Fluss</em>, on the planning and construction of large dams in Latin America, is voluminous in pages, extensive in bibliography and sources, broad in its temporal and geographical scope—spanning the whole twentieth century with case studies from Uruguay, Mexico, Venezuela, and Brazil—and profound in its analysis. Thanks to its superb organization, coherent narrative, and masterly contextualization, it also makes for a very good read.</p> <p>Comprised as a history of knowledge, Frederik Schulze sets out to show the central role of Latin America in the production and application of the technological knowledge that was at play in the state-driven planning and construction of large dams and the infrastructures attached to them. Water engineering, he convincingly argues, was a domain of notable Latin American agency throughout the twentieth century. Engineers and other experts from the area produced, adapted, and exported technological knowledge, while politicians skillfully played foreign firms and investors against each other.</p> <p>Existing literature on the history of dams, Schulze assesses, has neglected the topics of transfer of knowledge and global interactions. Scholars on Latin America and elsewhere have critiqued dams as \\\"large projects intoxicated with modernization\\\" (pp. xxviii–xxix) and have focused on the environmental damage they cause, but Schulze tells us these scholars have neglected the global processes of knowledge production. He vehemently opposes what he refers to as a victimizing perspective on the Global South and presents <strong>[End Page 695]</strong> convincing arguments and evidence against such approaches. Latin America, for one, created centers of technological knowledge of its own, he shows. The unpredictability of nature, he further illustrates, made it impossible to create stable knowledge on dams, and this precarity opened spaces of contestation for local technicians and politicians.</p> <p>His journey starts in Uruguay (Rincón del Bonete Dam, 1904–48), continues to Mexico (Miguel Alemán Dam, 1944–60) and Venezuela (Guri Dam, 1949–86), and ends in Brazil (Tucuruí Dam, 1973–84). Beyond the geographical voyage, the book also moves through development ideas in Latin America's twentieth century. It starts with the construction of a dam for the singular purpose of the production of electricity (Uruguay), continues with a dam's embeddedness in TVA-style regional development planning (Mexico), then moves to the Cold War context of industrialization and economic planning (Venezuela), and finishes with a project that symbolized technological independence from the North while being heavily contested for its social and ecological consequences (Brazil). Importantly, all four chapters end with a conclusion that places the national cases in a broader Latin American perspective at their respective moments in time. Each of these case studies would merit a review of their own.</p> <p>All the cases substantially add to Schulze's argument that Latin American nation-states, technocrats, and private businesses were confident producers and applicants of technological knowledge, who could compete and self-consciously negotiate with their European and North American partners. Not surprisingly, among the producers of knowledge, engineers played a particularly important role, and Schulze elaborates on their training and professionalization in all the countries under study. Engineers, however, are by far not the only characters who appear in Schulze's story. Politicians, diplomats, entrepreneurs, and anthropologists—to name but a few—also figure prominently. And despite the focus on knowledge production, the book also expands on cultural dimensions and the nation-building function of the dams. More often than not, Schulze shows, dam construction came with a civilizing mission targeted at the rivers that were to be \\\"tamed,\\\" but also at the environments and populations surrounding them. It is a special strength of the book that while always adding to its line of argumentation, it also allows for many small stories...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology and Culture\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a926331\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a926331","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
评论者 Wissen im Fluss:Der lateinamerikanische Staudammbau im 20.Jahrhundert als globale Wissensgeschichte [Knowledge in flux:Frederik Schulze Teresa Huhle (bio) Wissen im Fluss:Der lateinamerikanische Staudammbau im 20.Jahrhundert als globale Wissensgeschichte [Knowledge in Flux:二十世纪拉丁美洲大坝建设作为一部全球知识史]作者:弗雷德里克-舒尔茨。帕德博恩:Brill Schöningh, 2022。Pp.515.本书的规模与其主题相符。弗雷德里克-舒尔茨(Frederik Schulze)的《大坝的智慧》(Wissen im Fluss)一书介绍了拉丁美洲大型水坝的规划和建设情况,书中篇幅浩繁,参考书目和资料来源丰富,时间和地理范围广泛,涵盖整个二十世纪,对乌拉圭、墨西哥、委内瑞拉和巴西进行了案例研究,分析深刻。由于其出色的编排、连贯的叙述和巧妙的背景分析,该书还非常适合阅读。作为一部知识史,弗雷德里克-舒尔茨致力于展示拉丁美洲在生产和应用技术知识方面的核心作用,而这些知识在国家主导的大型水坝及其附属基础设施的规划和建设中发挥着重要作用。他令人信服地指出,在整个二十世纪,水利工程都是拉美著名机构的工作领域。该地区的工程师和其他专家生产、改造和出口技术知识,而政治家则巧妙地与外国公司和投资者相互博弈。舒尔茨认为,关于大坝历史的现有文献忽略了知识转让和全球互动的主题。研究拉丁美洲和其他地区的学者批评大坝是 "沉醉于现代化的大型项目"(第 xxviii-xxix 页),并关注它们对环境造成的破坏,但舒尔茨告诉我们,这些学者忽视了知识生产的全球过程。他坚决反对他所说的对全球南部的受害观点,并提出了 [第 695 页完] 令人信服的论点和证据来反对这种方法。他指出,拉丁美洲已经创建了自己的技术知识中心。他进一步说明,大自然的不可预测性使得人们无法创造稳定的大坝知识,而这种不稳定性为当地技术人员和政治家开辟了争论的空间。他的旅程从乌拉圭开始(Rincón del Bonete 大坝,1904-48 年),一直到墨西哥(米格尔-阿莱曼大坝,1944-60 年)和委内瑞拉(古里大坝,1949-86 年),最后在巴西结束(图库鲁伊大坝,1973-84 年)。除了地理航程,本书还介绍了拉丁美洲 20 世纪的发展理念。本书从为发电这一单一目的而建造大坝开始(乌拉圭),到大坝嵌入 TVA 式的地区发展规划(墨西哥),再到冷战背景下的工业化和经济规划(委内瑞拉),最后以一个象征着技术独立于北方,同时因其社会和生态后果而备受争议的项目(巴西)结束。重要的是,所有四章最后都有一个结论,将这些国家的案例置于各自所处时代的更广阔的拉美视角中。每一个案例研究都值得单独进行回顾。舒尔茨认为,拉美国家、技术官僚和私营企业是自信的技术知识生产者和应用者,他们可以与欧洲和北美的合作伙伴竞争并自觉地进行谈判。毫不奇怪,在知识生产者中,工程师扮演着特别重要的角色,舒尔茨详细阐述了他们在所有研究对象国的培训和职业化情况。然而,在舒尔茨的故事中出现的人物远不止工程师。政治家、外交官、企业家和人类学家--仅举几例--也在书中占有重要地位。尽管本书的重点是知识生产,但也对大坝的文化层面和国家建设功能进行了阐述。舒尔茨在书中指出,大坝建设通常都带有文明化的使命,不仅针对要 "驯服 "的河流,也针对河流周围的环境和人口。该书的一个特别之处在于,它在不断增加论证思路的同时,还允许许多小故事......
Wissen im Fluss: Der lateinamerikanische Staudammbau im 20. Jahrhundert als globale Wissensgeschichte [Knowledge in flux: Latin American dam construction in the twentieth century as a global history of knowledge] by Frederik Schulze (review)
Reviewed by:
Wissen im Fluss: Der lateinamerikanische Staudammbau im 20. Jahrhundert als globale Wissensgeschichte [Knowledge in flux: Latin American dam construction in the twentieth century as a global history of knowledge] by Frederik Schulze
Teresa Huhle (bio)
Wissen im Fluss: Der lateinamerikanische Staudammbau im 20. Jahrhundert als globale Wissensgeschichte [Knowledge in flux: Latin American dam construction in the twentieth century as a global history of knowledge] By Frederik Schulze. Paderborn: Brill Schöningh, 2022. Pp. 515.
The scales of this book match its topic. Frederik Schulze's Wissen im Fluss, on the planning and construction of large dams in Latin America, is voluminous in pages, extensive in bibliography and sources, broad in its temporal and geographical scope—spanning the whole twentieth century with case studies from Uruguay, Mexico, Venezuela, and Brazil—and profound in its analysis. Thanks to its superb organization, coherent narrative, and masterly contextualization, it also makes for a very good read.
Comprised as a history of knowledge, Frederik Schulze sets out to show the central role of Latin America in the production and application of the technological knowledge that was at play in the state-driven planning and construction of large dams and the infrastructures attached to them. Water engineering, he convincingly argues, was a domain of notable Latin American agency throughout the twentieth century. Engineers and other experts from the area produced, adapted, and exported technological knowledge, while politicians skillfully played foreign firms and investors against each other.
Existing literature on the history of dams, Schulze assesses, has neglected the topics of transfer of knowledge and global interactions. Scholars on Latin America and elsewhere have critiqued dams as "large projects intoxicated with modernization" (pp. xxviii–xxix) and have focused on the environmental damage they cause, but Schulze tells us these scholars have neglected the global processes of knowledge production. He vehemently opposes what he refers to as a victimizing perspective on the Global South and presents [End Page 695] convincing arguments and evidence against such approaches. Latin America, for one, created centers of technological knowledge of its own, he shows. The unpredictability of nature, he further illustrates, made it impossible to create stable knowledge on dams, and this precarity opened spaces of contestation for local technicians and politicians.
His journey starts in Uruguay (Rincón del Bonete Dam, 1904–48), continues to Mexico (Miguel Alemán Dam, 1944–60) and Venezuela (Guri Dam, 1949–86), and ends in Brazil (Tucuruí Dam, 1973–84). Beyond the geographical voyage, the book also moves through development ideas in Latin America's twentieth century. It starts with the construction of a dam for the singular purpose of the production of electricity (Uruguay), continues with a dam's embeddedness in TVA-style regional development planning (Mexico), then moves to the Cold War context of industrialization and economic planning (Venezuela), and finishes with a project that symbolized technological independence from the North while being heavily contested for its social and ecological consequences (Brazil). Importantly, all four chapters end with a conclusion that places the national cases in a broader Latin American perspective at their respective moments in time. Each of these case studies would merit a review of their own.
All the cases substantially add to Schulze's argument that Latin American nation-states, technocrats, and private businesses were confident producers and applicants of technological knowledge, who could compete and self-consciously negotiate with their European and North American partners. Not surprisingly, among the producers of knowledge, engineers played a particularly important role, and Schulze elaborates on their training and professionalization in all the countries under study. Engineers, however, are by far not the only characters who appear in Schulze's story. Politicians, diplomats, entrepreneurs, and anthropologists—to name but a few—also figure prominently. And despite the focus on knowledge production, the book also expands on cultural dimensions and the nation-building function of the dams. More often than not, Schulze shows, dam construction came with a civilizing mission targeted at the rivers that were to be "tamed," but also at the environments and populations surrounding them. It is a special strength of the book that while always adding to its line of argumentation, it also allows for many small stories...
期刊介绍:
Technology and Culture, the preeminent journal of the history of technology, draws on scholarship in diverse disciplines to publish insightful pieces intended for general readers as well as specialists. Subscribers include scientists, engineers, anthropologists, sociologists, economists, museum curators, archivists, scholars, librarians, educators, historians, and many others. In addition to scholarly essays, each issue features 30-40 book reviews and reviews of new museum exhibitions. To illuminate important debates and draw attention to specific topics, the journal occasionally publishes thematic issues. Technology and Culture is the official journal of the Society for the History of Technology (SHOT).