棕色皮肤,白色外套:Projit Bihari Mukharji 著的《1920-66 年印度的种族科学》,以及 Leslie A. Schwalm 著的《内战美国的医学、科学和种族塑造》:内战美国的医学、科学和种族形成》,莱斯利-A-施瓦姆著,以及健康的主人:Christopher D. E. Willoughby 著:Masters of Health: Racial Science and Slavery in U.S. Medical Schools(评论)

IF 0.8 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Technology and Culture Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1353/tech.2024.a926334
Chanda Prescod-Weinstein
{"title":"棕色皮肤,白色外套:Projit Bihari Mukharji 著的《1920-66 年印度的种族科学》,以及 Leslie A. Schwalm 著的《内战美国的医学、科学和种族塑造》:内战美国的医学、科学和种族形成》,莱斯利-A-施瓦姆著,以及健康的主人:Christopher D. E. Willoughby 著:Masters of Health: Racial Science and Slavery in U.S. Medical Schools(评论)","authors":"Chanda Prescod-Weinstein","doi":"10.1353/tech.2024.a926334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Brown Skins, White Coats: Race Science in India, 1920–66</em> by Projit Bihari Mukharji, and: <em>Medicine, Science, and Making Race in Civil War America</em> by Leslie A. Schwalm, and: <em>Masters of Health: Racial Science and Slavery in U.S. Medical Schools</em> by Christopher D. E. Willoughby <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Chanda Prescod-Weinstein (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Brown Skins, White Coats: Race Science in India, 1920–66</em> By Projit Bihari Mukharji. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2022. Pp. 348. <em>Medicine, Science, and Making Race in Civil War America</em> By Leslie A. Schwalm. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2023. Pp. 215. <em>Masters of Health: Racial Science and Slavery in U.S. Medical Schools</em> By Christopher D. E. Willoughby. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2022. Pp. 267. <p>Recently, I visited a university to deliver a distinguished guest lecture. I chose as my topic the question of why particle physics is an area of research worth pursuing, and in the lecture, I attempted to answer. After-ward, a brown-skinned student approached me and asked, \"I was wondering, as a fellow mixed person, how do you phenotypically experience Black spaces?\" A bit taken aback, I explained that I have never publicly identified myself as mixed but always as Black, and that I think \"y'all students\" need to stop doing race science. He looked at me with a genuinely confused expression on his face: he did not understand why I was mentioning race science at all. This story alone makes the case for why new scholarship on the history and development of race science continue to be not only intellectually but also socially and politically significant. With <em>Brown Skins, White Coats</em> by Projit Bihari Mukharji, <em>Medicine, Science, and Making Race in Civil War America</em> by Leslie A. Schwalm, and <em>Masters of Health</em> by Christopher D. E. Willoughby, we gain new perspectives on how the race science of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries produced the social power relations that govern our twenty-first-century lives.</p> <p>As Mukharji explains in <em>Brown Skins, White Coats</em>, the first known use of \"phenotype\" (according to the Oxford English Dictionary) was in 1910 by botanists, and it emphasized the observed appearance of an organism (p. 105). <em>Brown Skins</em> is primarily concerned with concepts of race that go beyond the visible, which is why Mukharji's discussion of phenotype is closer to the middle than the beginning of the book. He explains attempts by Indian scientists to delineate a concept of race through the ability to taste phenylthiocarbamide, an example of how conceptions of race need not <strong>[End Page 701]</strong> necessarily rely on visible markers. This note about phenotype is significant in part because it is a word that I hear commonly invoked in American social discourse about the appearance of African-descended peoples in the Americas. I found myself wondering how the word went from the purview of white botanists to being understood as a socially significant term among African Americans.</p> <p><em>Brown Skins, White Coats</em> is an important intervention in U.S.-published literature on race science history, which tends to focus on European and white American theorists and perpetrators of race science. The reason for this traditional emphasis is obvious, but such a practice also risks rein-scribing American hegemony while eschewing a more global and holistic understanding of how race has operated around the world. Mukharji significantly expands our understanding of twentieth-century history of science and postcolonial state building by introducing us to a cast of European and Indian scientists who were interested in potential nonvisible markers of genetic \"race\" groups. These interests often overlapped with received notions of caste among Hindus—which Mukharji refers to as a \"racial logic\" in the introduction, but not race itself—but the practice of race science in India was more expansive than an attempt to reify the long-standing caste structure.</p> <p>Mukharji's work shows that people arrived at their interest in organizing groups by apparently distinct genetic features for diverse reasons, and an investment in caste was not necessarily the motivating factor. Based on the title, I expected a book that analyzed colorism and other visible markers—a sign of my own bias as a U.S.-born and...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brown Skins, White Coats: Race Science in India, 1920–66 by Projit Bihari Mukharji, and: Medicine, Science, and Making Race in Civil War America by Leslie A. Schwalm, and: Masters of Health: Racial Science and Slavery in U.S. Medical Schools by Christopher D. E. Willoughby (review)\",\"authors\":\"Chanda Prescod-Weinstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/tech.2024.a926334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Brown Skins, White Coats: Race Science in India, 1920–66</em> by Projit Bihari Mukharji, and: <em>Medicine, Science, and Making Race in Civil War America</em> by Leslie A. Schwalm, and: <em>Masters of Health: Racial Science and Slavery in U.S. Medical Schools</em> by Christopher D. E. Willoughby <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Chanda Prescod-Weinstein (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Brown Skins, White Coats: Race Science in India, 1920–66</em> By Projit Bihari Mukharji. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2022. Pp. 348. <em>Medicine, Science, and Making Race in Civil War America</em> By Leslie A. Schwalm. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2023. Pp. 215. <em>Masters of Health: Racial Science and Slavery in U.S. Medical Schools</em> By Christopher D. E. Willoughby. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2022. Pp. 267. <p>Recently, I visited a university to deliver a distinguished guest lecture. I chose as my topic the question of why particle physics is an area of research worth pursuing, and in the lecture, I attempted to answer. After-ward, a brown-skinned student approached me and asked, \\\"I was wondering, as a fellow mixed person, how do you phenotypically experience Black spaces?\\\" A bit taken aback, I explained that I have never publicly identified myself as mixed but always as Black, and that I think \\\"y'all students\\\" need to stop doing race science. He looked at me with a genuinely confused expression on his face: he did not understand why I was mentioning race science at all. This story alone makes the case for why new scholarship on the history and development of race science continue to be not only intellectually but also socially and politically significant. With <em>Brown Skins, White Coats</em> by Projit Bihari Mukharji, <em>Medicine, Science, and Making Race in Civil War America</em> by Leslie A. Schwalm, and <em>Masters of Health</em> by Christopher D. E. Willoughby, we gain new perspectives on how the race science of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries produced the social power relations that govern our twenty-first-century lives.</p> <p>As Mukharji explains in <em>Brown Skins, White Coats</em>, the first known use of \\\"phenotype\\\" (according to the Oxford English Dictionary) was in 1910 by botanists, and it emphasized the observed appearance of an organism (p. 105). <em>Brown Skins</em> is primarily concerned with concepts of race that go beyond the visible, which is why Mukharji's discussion of phenotype is closer to the middle than the beginning of the book. He explains attempts by Indian scientists to delineate a concept of race through the ability to taste phenylthiocarbamide, an example of how conceptions of race need not <strong>[End Page 701]</strong> necessarily rely on visible markers. This note about phenotype is significant in part because it is a word that I hear commonly invoked in American social discourse about the appearance of African-descended peoples in the Americas. I found myself wondering how the word went from the purview of white botanists to being understood as a socially significant term among African Americans.</p> <p><em>Brown Skins, White Coats</em> is an important intervention in U.S.-published literature on race science history, which tends to focus on European and white American theorists and perpetrators of race science. The reason for this traditional emphasis is obvious, but such a practice also risks rein-scribing American hegemony while eschewing a more global and holistic understanding of how race has operated around the world. Mukharji significantly expands our understanding of twentieth-century history of science and postcolonial state building by introducing us to a cast of European and Indian scientists who were interested in potential nonvisible markers of genetic \\\"race\\\" groups. These interests often overlapped with received notions of caste among Hindus—which Mukharji refers to as a \\\"racial logic\\\" in the introduction, but not race itself—but the practice of race science in India was more expansive than an attempt to reify the long-standing caste structure.</p> <p>Mukharji's work shows that people arrived at their interest in organizing groups by apparently distinct genetic features for diverse reasons, and an investment in caste was not necessarily the motivating factor. Based on the title, I expected a book that analyzed colorism and other visible markers—a sign of my own bias as a U.S.-born and...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology and Culture\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a926334\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a926334","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评论者: 棕色皮肤,白色外套:Projit Bihari Mukharji 所著的《Brown Skins, White Coats: Race Science in India, 1920-66 》,以及Leslie A. Schwalm 著:《内战美国的医学、科学和种族形成》,以及健康的主人:克里斯托弗-D-E-威洛比(Christopher D. E. Willoughby)著:《美国医学院中的种族科学与奴隶制》(Chanda Prescod-Weinstein (bio) Brown Skins, White Coats:1920-66 年印度的种族科学》,Projit Bihari Mukharji 著。芝加哥:芝加哥:芝加哥大学出版社,2022 年。Pp.348.内战美国的医学、科学和种族构成》,莱斯利-A-施瓦姆著。Chapel Hill:北卡罗来纳大学出版社,2023 年。第 215 页。健康的主人:美国医学院的种族科学与奴隶制》,Christopher D. E. Willoughby 著。Chapel Hill:北卡罗来纳大学出版社,2022 年。第 267 页。最近,我访问了一所大学,发表了一场杰出的客座演讲。我选择的题目是 "为什么粒子物理学是一个值得研究的领域",在讲座中,我试图回答这个问题。之后,一位棕色皮肤的学生走过来问我:"我想知道,作为一个混血儿,你是如何从表型上体验黑人空间的?"我有点吃惊,解释说我从来没有公开说过自己是混血儿,而是一直说自己是黑人,而且我认为 "你们这些学生 "需要停止做种族科学研究。他一脸困惑地看着我:他完全不明白我为什么要提种族科学。这个故事本身就说明了为什么有关种族科学的历史和发展的新学术研究不仅在知识上,而且在社会和政治上都具有重要意义。通过普罗吉特-比哈里-穆哈尔吉(Projit Bihari Mukharji)的《棕色皮肤,白色大衣》(Brown Skins, White Coats),莱斯利-施瓦姆(Leslie A. Schwalm)的《内战美国的医学、科学和种族形成》(Medicine, Science, and Making Race in Civil War America),以及克里斯托弗-威洛比(Christopher D. E. Willoughby)的《健康大师》(Masters of Health),我们获得了新的视角,了解十九世纪和二十世纪的种族科学如何产生了支配我们二十一世纪生活的社会权力关系。正如穆哈尔吉在《棕色皮肤,白色外套》一书中解释的那样,"表型 "一词(根据《牛津英语词典》)的首次使用是在 1910 年,当时是由植物学家使用的,它强调的是观察到的生物体的外观(第 105 页)。棕色皮肤》主要关注的是超越可见性的种族概念,这也是为什么穆哈尔吉对表型的讨论更接近于本书的中间而非开头。他解释了印度科学家试图通过品尝苯基硫代甲酰胺的能力来划分种族概念的尝试,这是一个种族概念不一定[完701页]依赖于可见标记的例子。关于 "表型"(phenotype)的说明之所以重要,部分原因是我在美国社会关于非洲裔美洲人外貌的讨论中经常听到这个词。我发现自己很好奇,这个词是如何从白人植物学家的专利变成非裔美国人理解的具有社会意义的词汇的。棕色皮肤,白色外套》是对美国出版的种族科学史文献的一次重要干预,这些文献往往侧重于欧洲和美国白人理论家以及种族科学的实施者。这种传统侧重点的原因显而易见,但这种做法也有可能将美国的霸权再次固化,而忽略了对世界范围内种族如何运作的更具全球性和整体性的理解。穆哈尔吉向我们介绍了一批欧洲和印度科学家,他们对遗传 "种族 "群体的潜在非可见标记很感兴趣,从而极大地扩展了我们对二十世纪科学史和后殖民国家建设的理解。这些兴趣往往与印度人的种姓观念重叠--穆哈尔吉在引言中将其称为 "种族逻辑",而非种族本身--但印度的种族科学实践比试图重新定义长期存在的种姓结构更为广泛。穆哈尔吉的研究表明,人们出于各种不同的原因,对按照明显不同的遗传特征组织群体产生了兴趣,而对种姓的投资并不一定是动因。根据书名,我以为这本书会分析肤色歧视和其他可见标记--这表明了我自己的偏见,因为我是在美国出生的,也是......
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Brown Skins, White Coats: Race Science in India, 1920–66 by Projit Bihari Mukharji, and: Medicine, Science, and Making Race in Civil War America by Leslie A. Schwalm, and: Masters of Health: Racial Science and Slavery in U.S. Medical Schools by Christopher D. E. Willoughby (review)

Reviewed by:

  • Brown Skins, White Coats: Race Science in India, 1920–66 by Projit Bihari Mukharji, and: Medicine, Science, and Making Race in Civil War America by Leslie A. Schwalm, and: Masters of Health: Racial Science and Slavery in U.S. Medical Schools by Christopher D. E. Willoughby
  • Chanda Prescod-Weinstein (bio)
Brown Skins, White Coats: Race Science in India, 1920–66 By Projit Bihari Mukharji. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2022. Pp. 348. Medicine, Science, and Making Race in Civil War America By Leslie A. Schwalm. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2023. Pp. 215. Masters of Health: Racial Science and Slavery in U.S. Medical Schools By Christopher D. E. Willoughby. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2022. Pp. 267.

Recently, I visited a university to deliver a distinguished guest lecture. I chose as my topic the question of why particle physics is an area of research worth pursuing, and in the lecture, I attempted to answer. After-ward, a brown-skinned student approached me and asked, "I was wondering, as a fellow mixed person, how do you phenotypically experience Black spaces?" A bit taken aback, I explained that I have never publicly identified myself as mixed but always as Black, and that I think "y'all students" need to stop doing race science. He looked at me with a genuinely confused expression on his face: he did not understand why I was mentioning race science at all. This story alone makes the case for why new scholarship on the history and development of race science continue to be not only intellectually but also socially and politically significant. With Brown Skins, White Coats by Projit Bihari Mukharji, Medicine, Science, and Making Race in Civil War America by Leslie A. Schwalm, and Masters of Health by Christopher D. E. Willoughby, we gain new perspectives on how the race science of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries produced the social power relations that govern our twenty-first-century lives.

As Mukharji explains in Brown Skins, White Coats, the first known use of "phenotype" (according to the Oxford English Dictionary) was in 1910 by botanists, and it emphasized the observed appearance of an organism (p. 105). Brown Skins is primarily concerned with concepts of race that go beyond the visible, which is why Mukharji's discussion of phenotype is closer to the middle than the beginning of the book. He explains attempts by Indian scientists to delineate a concept of race through the ability to taste phenylthiocarbamide, an example of how conceptions of race need not [End Page 701] necessarily rely on visible markers. This note about phenotype is significant in part because it is a word that I hear commonly invoked in American social discourse about the appearance of African-descended peoples in the Americas. I found myself wondering how the word went from the purview of white botanists to being understood as a socially significant term among African Americans.

Brown Skins, White Coats is an important intervention in U.S.-published literature on race science history, which tends to focus on European and white American theorists and perpetrators of race science. The reason for this traditional emphasis is obvious, but such a practice also risks rein-scribing American hegemony while eschewing a more global and holistic understanding of how race has operated around the world. Mukharji significantly expands our understanding of twentieth-century history of science and postcolonial state building by introducing us to a cast of European and Indian scientists who were interested in potential nonvisible markers of genetic "race" groups. These interests often overlapped with received notions of caste among Hindus—which Mukharji refers to as a "racial logic" in the introduction, but not race itself—but the practice of race science in India was more expansive than an attempt to reify the long-standing caste structure.

Mukharji's work shows that people arrived at their interest in organizing groups by apparently distinct genetic features for diverse reasons, and an investment in caste was not necessarily the motivating factor. Based on the title, I expected a book that analyzed colorism and other visible markers—a sign of my own bias as a U.S.-born and...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Technology and Culture
Technology and Culture 社会科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
225
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Technology and Culture, the preeminent journal of the history of technology, draws on scholarship in diverse disciplines to publish insightful pieces intended for general readers as well as specialists. Subscribers include scientists, engineers, anthropologists, sociologists, economists, museum curators, archivists, scholars, librarians, educators, historians, and many others. In addition to scholarly essays, each issue features 30-40 book reviews and reviews of new museum exhibitions. To illuminate important debates and draw attention to specific topics, the journal occasionally publishes thematic issues. Technology and Culture is the official journal of the Society for the History of Technology (SHOT).
期刊最新文献
Hollywood's Embassies: How Movie Theaters Projected American Power Around the Globe by Ross Melnick (review) Communications in Turkey and the Ottoman Empire: A Critical History by Burçe Çelik (review) Media Ruins: Cambodian Postwar Media Reconstruction and the Geopolitics of Technology by Margaret Jack (review) Collective Wisdom: Collecting in the Early Modern Academy ed. by Anna Marie Roos and Vera Keller (review) Scientific Advice to the Nineteenth-Century British State by Roland Jackson (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1