{"title":"不可测量的天气:从 1820 年到飓风桑迪期间的气象数据和殖民主义》,萨拉-J-格罗斯曼著(评论)","authors":"Sara M. B. Simon","doi":"10.1353/tech.2024.a926343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Immeasurable Weather: Meteorological Data and Settler Colonialism from 1820 to Hurricane Sandy</em> by Sara J. Grossman <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Sara M. B. Simon (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Immeasurable Weather: Meteorological Data and Settler Colonialism from 1820 to Hurricane Sandy</em> By Sara J. Grossman. Durham: Duke University Press, 2023. Pp. 246. <p>In <em>Immeasurable Weather</em>, Sara J. Grossman explores the historical production of U.S. weather data through an examination of the data's inextricable proximity to power. As the full title suggests, the book spans nearly two centuries. Gross-man covers state incentives to capture weather data, the labor demands required to collect and contextualize data adequately, the eventual militarization of weather data, and the damaging legacies baked into contemporary understandings about the data's utility. Most acutely, the book shows how settler colonialism has been foundational to shaping the U.S. public's conception of data production as an objective form of truth building and as a tool of control: \"What was countable could be quantified; what was quantifiable could be known and claimed\" (p. 90). Grossman writes about these troubling hegemonic data conceptions with urgency, clarity, and beautiful attention to prose. A sociocultural history of weather data, <em>Immeasurable Weather</em> is a feat both in substance and style.</p> <p><em>Immeasurable Weather</em> begins in the early nineteenth century with stories of the steadfast workers—from \"academy professionals to weather observers and enthusiasts\" (p. 29)—who filled out weather tables tediously, helping to construct a national project of data collection. As Grossman describes, this system of volunteer labor laid the groundwork for a shared cultural narrative around knowledge production and nation building (ch. 1). The book's second chapter builds on this theme of data labor by examining the national network of white women weather data workers who compiled and calculated information for the Smithsonian Meteorological Project. Next, <em>Immeasurable Weather</em> recounts late nineteenth-century efforts to gather upper-air data automatically and remotely, through the male-dominated <strong>[End Page 720]</strong> domain of meteorological kite technologies (ch. 3). The book moves into the twentieth century by further examining the professionalization of weather data, interrogating the shift away from careful, hand-produced data forms and toward a more systematized and automated network of continuous data streams (ch. 4). In the final chapter, Grossman examines the power consolidated and obtained through satellite meteorology, noting how government agencies like the Department of Defense and the Central Intelligence Agency have supported the development of U.S. weather data systems.</p> <p>Grossman provides evidence for her claims through a fascinating collection of letters, data forms, instruction manuals, and institutional reports. Throughout the book, these primary sources work in conversation with interdisciplinary scholarship, making the book relevant to readers across fields, from Grossman's own discipline of environmental studies to fields like Indigenous studies, disability studies, and critical data studies. Historians of technology will be especially excited by the book's descriptions of the early \"producers, computers, compilers, and caretakers\" (p. 13) of weather data, often women hired cheaply and working from home, outside of public view; Grossman connects these stories of data workers to similar research by scholars like Jennifer Light and Mar Hicks, showing not only how human labor has always been foundational to data-making processes but also how the public's conception of technological progress is shaped profoundly by infrastructural labor, however hidden these backstories may be.</p> <p>Many key themes throughout <em>Immeasurable Weather</em> will be worthwhile to scholars interested in the critical study of data, automation, and technology. Historians of technology will find intriguing connections between the militarization of weather data and the rise of wartime computing. Indeed, Grossman's book complements Kristine C. Harper's <em>Weather by the Number</em>s (2008), which explores the electronic digital computer's role in professionalizing numerical weather prediction. Additionally, Gross-man's accounts of weather data being stripped of its complexities for the sake of standardization will be familiar to readers of Cal Biruk's writing on the production of public health data, or of Dan Bouk's writing on both life insurers and the U.S. census. Grossman also offers sharp critiques of how real-time weather data streams and visualizations distort the public's notion of crisis, detaching data from \"the lived...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immeasurable Weather: Meteorological Data and Settler Colonialism from 1820 to Hurricane Sandy by Sara J. Grossman (review)\",\"authors\":\"Sara M. B. Simon\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/tech.2024.a926343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Immeasurable Weather: Meteorological Data and Settler Colonialism from 1820 to Hurricane Sandy</em> by Sara J. Grossman <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Sara M. B. Simon (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Immeasurable Weather: Meteorological Data and Settler Colonialism from 1820 to Hurricane Sandy</em> By Sara J. Grossman. Durham: Duke University Press, 2023. Pp. 246. <p>In <em>Immeasurable Weather</em>, Sara J. Grossman explores the historical production of U.S. weather data through an examination of the data's inextricable proximity to power. As the full title suggests, the book spans nearly two centuries. Gross-man covers state incentives to capture weather data, the labor demands required to collect and contextualize data adequately, the eventual militarization of weather data, and the damaging legacies baked into contemporary understandings about the data's utility. Most acutely, the book shows how settler colonialism has been foundational to shaping the U.S. public's conception of data production as an objective form of truth building and as a tool of control: \\\"What was countable could be quantified; what was quantifiable could be known and claimed\\\" (p. 90). Grossman writes about these troubling hegemonic data conceptions with urgency, clarity, and beautiful attention to prose. A sociocultural history of weather data, <em>Immeasurable Weather</em> is a feat both in substance and style.</p> <p><em>Immeasurable Weather</em> begins in the early nineteenth century with stories of the steadfast workers—from \\\"academy professionals to weather observers and enthusiasts\\\" (p. 29)—who filled out weather tables tediously, helping to construct a national project of data collection. As Grossman describes, this system of volunteer labor laid the groundwork for a shared cultural narrative around knowledge production and nation building (ch. 1). The book's second chapter builds on this theme of data labor by examining the national network of white women weather data workers who compiled and calculated information for the Smithsonian Meteorological Project. Next, <em>Immeasurable Weather</em> recounts late nineteenth-century efforts to gather upper-air data automatically and remotely, through the male-dominated <strong>[End Page 720]</strong> domain of meteorological kite technologies (ch. 3). The book moves into the twentieth century by further examining the professionalization of weather data, interrogating the shift away from careful, hand-produced data forms and toward a more systematized and automated network of continuous data streams (ch. 4). In the final chapter, Grossman examines the power consolidated and obtained through satellite meteorology, noting how government agencies like the Department of Defense and the Central Intelligence Agency have supported the development of U.S. weather data systems.</p> <p>Grossman provides evidence for her claims through a fascinating collection of letters, data forms, instruction manuals, and institutional reports. Throughout the book, these primary sources work in conversation with interdisciplinary scholarship, making the book relevant to readers across fields, from Grossman's own discipline of environmental studies to fields like Indigenous studies, disability studies, and critical data studies. Historians of technology will be especially excited by the book's descriptions of the early \\\"producers, computers, compilers, and caretakers\\\" (p. 13) of weather data, often women hired cheaply and working from home, outside of public view; Grossman connects these stories of data workers to similar research by scholars like Jennifer Light and Mar Hicks, showing not only how human labor has always been foundational to data-making processes but also how the public's conception of technological progress is shaped profoundly by infrastructural labor, however hidden these backstories may be.</p> <p>Many key themes throughout <em>Immeasurable Weather</em> will be worthwhile to scholars interested in the critical study of data, automation, and technology. Historians of technology will find intriguing connections between the militarization of weather data and the rise of wartime computing. Indeed, Grossman's book complements Kristine C. Harper's <em>Weather by the Number</em>s (2008), which explores the electronic digital computer's role in professionalizing numerical weather prediction. Additionally, Gross-man's accounts of weather data being stripped of its complexities for the sake of standardization will be familiar to readers of Cal Biruk's writing on the production of public health data, or of Dan Bouk's writing on both life insurers and the U.S. census. Grossman also offers sharp critiques of how real-time weather data streams and visualizations distort the public's notion of crisis, detaching data from \\\"the lived...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology and Culture\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a926343\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a926343","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
评论者: 不可测量的天气:Sara J. Grossman Sara M. B. Simon (bio) Immeasurable Weather:Meteorological Data and Settler Colonialism from 1820 to Hurricane Sandy By Sara J. Grossman.杜伦:杜克大学出版社,2023 年。第 246 页。在《不可估量的天气》一书中,萨拉-J-格罗斯曼通过研究数据与权力密不可分的关系,探讨了美国天气数据的历史生产。正如书名所示,该书跨越了近两个世纪。格罗斯-曼在书中介绍了国家收集气象数据的动机、充分收集数据并将其背景化所需的劳动力要求、气象数据的最终军事化,以及对数据效用的当代理解所遗留下来的破坏性影响。最尖锐的是,该书展示了定居殖民主义是如何在美国公众心目中塑造了数据生产的概念,将其视为建立真相的客观形式和控制工具:"可计算的东西可以量化;可量化的东西可以被了解和宣称"(第 90 页)。格罗斯曼以急迫、清晰和优美的散文笔触描写了这些令人不安的霸权数据概念。作为一部气象数据的社会文化史,《不可估量的天气》在内容和风格上都是一项壮举。不可测量的天气》从十九世纪初开始,讲述了从 "学院专业人员到气象观测员和爱好者"(第 29 页)等坚定不移的工作者的故事,他们乏味地填写天气表格,帮助构建了一个全国性的数据收集项目。正如格罗斯曼所描述的,这一志愿劳动系统为围绕知识生产和国家建设的共同文化叙事奠定了基础(第 1 章)。本书第二章以数据劳动为主题,研究了为史密森气象项目编纂和计算信息的全国白人女性气象数据工作者网络。接下来,《不可估量的天气》讲述了 19 世纪晚期通过男性主导的气象风筝技术 [尾页 720]领域自动和远程收集高层空气数据的努力(第 3 章)。进入二十世纪,该书进一步研究了气象数据的专业化,探讨了从细致的手工制作数据形式向更加系统化和自动化的连续数据流网络的转变(第 4 章)。在最后一章,格罗斯曼研究了通过卫星气象学巩固和获得的权力,指出国防部和中央情报局等政府机构如何支持美国气象数据系统的发展。格罗斯曼通过一系列精彩的信件、数据表格、指导手册和机构报告为她的观点提供了证据。在整本书中,这些原始资料与跨学科的学术研究进行了对话,使本书与各个领域的读者都有关联,从格罗斯曼自己的环境研究学科到土著研究、残疾研究和批判性数据研究等领域。格罗斯曼将这些数据工作者的故事与詹妮弗-莱特(Jennifer Light)和马尔-希克斯(Mar Hicks)等学者的类似研究联系起来,不仅展示了人类劳动如何一直是数据制作过程的基础,而且展示了公众对技术进步的概念是如何被基础设施劳动深刻塑造的,无论这些背景故事多么隐蔽。对于对数据、自动化和技术的批判性研究感兴趣的学者来说,《不可估量的天气》中的许多关键主题都很有价值。技术史学家会发现气象数据军事化与战时计算机的兴起之间存在着耐人寻味的联系。事实上,格罗斯曼的这本书是对克里斯汀-C-哈珀(Kristine C. Harper)的《数字天气》(Weather by the Numbers,2008 年)的补充,后者探讨了电子数字计算机在数字天气预报专业化中的作用。此外,对于卡尔-比鲁克(Cal Biruk)撰写的关于公共卫生数据生产的文章,或丹-布克(Dan Bouk)撰写的关于人寿保险公司和美国人口普查的文章的读者来说,格罗斯曼关于天气数据为了标准化而被剥离其复杂性的叙述也不会陌生。格罗斯曼还尖锐地批评了实时天气数据流和可视化如何扭曲了公众的危机概念,使数据脱离了 "生活"。
Immeasurable Weather: Meteorological Data and Settler Colonialism from 1820 to Hurricane Sandy by Sara J. Grossman (review)
Reviewed by:
Immeasurable Weather: Meteorological Data and Settler Colonialism from 1820 to Hurricane Sandy by Sara J. Grossman
Sara M. B. Simon (bio)
Immeasurable Weather: Meteorological Data and Settler Colonialism from 1820 to Hurricane Sandy By Sara J. Grossman. Durham: Duke University Press, 2023. Pp. 246.
In Immeasurable Weather, Sara J. Grossman explores the historical production of U.S. weather data through an examination of the data's inextricable proximity to power. As the full title suggests, the book spans nearly two centuries. Gross-man covers state incentives to capture weather data, the labor demands required to collect and contextualize data adequately, the eventual militarization of weather data, and the damaging legacies baked into contemporary understandings about the data's utility. Most acutely, the book shows how settler colonialism has been foundational to shaping the U.S. public's conception of data production as an objective form of truth building and as a tool of control: "What was countable could be quantified; what was quantifiable could be known and claimed" (p. 90). Grossman writes about these troubling hegemonic data conceptions with urgency, clarity, and beautiful attention to prose. A sociocultural history of weather data, Immeasurable Weather is a feat both in substance and style.
Immeasurable Weather begins in the early nineteenth century with stories of the steadfast workers—from "academy professionals to weather observers and enthusiasts" (p. 29)—who filled out weather tables tediously, helping to construct a national project of data collection. As Grossman describes, this system of volunteer labor laid the groundwork for a shared cultural narrative around knowledge production and nation building (ch. 1). The book's second chapter builds on this theme of data labor by examining the national network of white women weather data workers who compiled and calculated information for the Smithsonian Meteorological Project. Next, Immeasurable Weather recounts late nineteenth-century efforts to gather upper-air data automatically and remotely, through the male-dominated [End Page 720] domain of meteorological kite technologies (ch. 3). The book moves into the twentieth century by further examining the professionalization of weather data, interrogating the shift away from careful, hand-produced data forms and toward a more systematized and automated network of continuous data streams (ch. 4). In the final chapter, Grossman examines the power consolidated and obtained through satellite meteorology, noting how government agencies like the Department of Defense and the Central Intelligence Agency have supported the development of U.S. weather data systems.
Grossman provides evidence for her claims through a fascinating collection of letters, data forms, instruction manuals, and institutional reports. Throughout the book, these primary sources work in conversation with interdisciplinary scholarship, making the book relevant to readers across fields, from Grossman's own discipline of environmental studies to fields like Indigenous studies, disability studies, and critical data studies. Historians of technology will be especially excited by the book's descriptions of the early "producers, computers, compilers, and caretakers" (p. 13) of weather data, often women hired cheaply and working from home, outside of public view; Grossman connects these stories of data workers to similar research by scholars like Jennifer Light and Mar Hicks, showing not only how human labor has always been foundational to data-making processes but also how the public's conception of technological progress is shaped profoundly by infrastructural labor, however hidden these backstories may be.
Many key themes throughout Immeasurable Weather will be worthwhile to scholars interested in the critical study of data, automation, and technology. Historians of technology will find intriguing connections between the militarization of weather data and the rise of wartime computing. Indeed, Grossman's book complements Kristine C. Harper's Weather by the Numbers (2008), which explores the electronic digital computer's role in professionalizing numerical weather prediction. Additionally, Gross-man's accounts of weather data being stripped of its complexities for the sake of standardization will be familiar to readers of Cal Biruk's writing on the production of public health data, or of Dan Bouk's writing on both life insurers and the U.S. census. Grossman also offers sharp critiques of how real-time weather data streams and visualizations distort the public's notion of crisis, detaching data from "the lived...
期刊介绍:
Technology and Culture, the preeminent journal of the history of technology, draws on scholarship in diverse disciplines to publish insightful pieces intended for general readers as well as specialists. Subscribers include scientists, engineers, anthropologists, sociologists, economists, museum curators, archivists, scholars, librarians, educators, historians, and many others. In addition to scholarly essays, each issue features 30-40 book reviews and reviews of new museum exhibitions. To illuminate important debates and draw attention to specific topics, the journal occasionally publishes thematic issues. Technology and Culture is the official journal of the Society for the History of Technology (SHOT).