{"title":"通过将基于树的回归与元搜索算法相结合建立洪水易感性模型,BWO","authors":"Deba Prakash Satapathy, Bibhu Prasad Mishra","doi":"10.1111/tgis.13171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Floods are becoming more widely acknowledged as a common occurrence of nature's dangers on a global scale. Although forecasting models primarily focus on timely warnings, models aimed at evaluating dangerous zones can play a vital role in shaping policies for adaptation, mitigation, and reducing the risk of disasters. Using machine learning techniques including hybrid black widow optimization (BWO) with XGBoost, LGBoost, and AdaBoost. We generate a flood susceptibility map for considered region of lower mahanadi basin (LMB). This study examines the effectiveness of these machine learning models in assessing and mapping flood susceptibility, while also providing suggestions for future research in this area. Flood susceptibility model was developed using 13 variables: Altitude, Aspect, Curvature, Distance from river, Drainage Density, Stream Power Index (SPI), Sediment Transport Index (STI), Rainfall intensity, Land Use Land Cover (LULC), Topographic Wetness Index (TWI), Terrain Roughness Index (TRI), Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and slope. Additionally, flood inventory data were incorporated into the model. Dataset was divided into a 70% portion for training model and a 30% portion for validating model. To assess the performance of the model, several evaluation metrics were employed, including receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and other performance indices. Evaluation of flood susceptibility mapping, using ROC curve method in combination with flood density yielded strong and reliable results for various models. BWO‐XGBoost achieved a score of 0.889, BWO‐LGBoost achieved a score of 0.937, and BWO‐ADABoost achieved a score of 0.904. These scores indicate effectiveness of these models in accurately predicting flood susceptibility in the study area. A comparison was made with commonly used methods in flood susceptibility assessment to evaluate the efficiency of proposed models. It was found that having a first‐class and enlightening database is crucial for accurately classifying flood types in flood susceptibility mapping. This aspect greatly contributes to improving the overall performance of the model. Among the evaluated methods, the hybrid model BWO‐LGBoost demonstrated better performance compared with others, indicating its effectiveness in accurately predicting flood susceptibility.","PeriodicalId":47842,"journal":{"name":"Transactions in GIS","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flood susceptibility modeling by integrating tree‐based regression with metaheuristic algorithm, BWO\",\"authors\":\"Deba Prakash Satapathy, Bibhu Prasad Mishra\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tgis.13171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Floods are becoming more widely acknowledged as a common occurrence of nature's dangers on a global scale. Although forecasting models primarily focus on timely warnings, models aimed at evaluating dangerous zones can play a vital role in shaping policies for adaptation, mitigation, and reducing the risk of disasters. Using machine learning techniques including hybrid black widow optimization (BWO) with XGBoost, LGBoost, and AdaBoost. We generate a flood susceptibility map for considered region of lower mahanadi basin (LMB). This study examines the effectiveness of these machine learning models in assessing and mapping flood susceptibility, while also providing suggestions for future research in this area. Flood susceptibility model was developed using 13 variables: Altitude, Aspect, Curvature, Distance from river, Drainage Density, Stream Power Index (SPI), Sediment Transport Index (STI), Rainfall intensity, Land Use Land Cover (LULC), Topographic Wetness Index (TWI), Terrain Roughness Index (TRI), Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and slope. Additionally, flood inventory data were incorporated into the model. Dataset was divided into a 70% portion for training model and a 30% portion for validating model. To assess the performance of the model, several evaluation metrics were employed, including receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and other performance indices. Evaluation of flood susceptibility mapping, using ROC curve method in combination with flood density yielded strong and reliable results for various models. BWO‐XGBoost achieved a score of 0.889, BWO‐LGBoost achieved a score of 0.937, and BWO‐ADABoost achieved a score of 0.904. These scores indicate effectiveness of these models in accurately predicting flood susceptibility in the study area. A comparison was made with commonly used methods in flood susceptibility assessment to evaluate the efficiency of proposed models. It was found that having a first‐class and enlightening database is crucial for accurately classifying flood types in flood susceptibility mapping. This aspect greatly contributes to improving the overall performance of the model. Among the evaluated methods, the hybrid model BWO‐LGBoost demonstrated better performance compared with others, indicating its effectiveness in accurately predicting flood susceptibility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions in GIS\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions in GIS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.13171\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions in GIS","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.13171","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Flood susceptibility modeling by integrating tree‐based regression with metaheuristic algorithm, BWO
Floods are becoming more widely acknowledged as a common occurrence of nature's dangers on a global scale. Although forecasting models primarily focus on timely warnings, models aimed at evaluating dangerous zones can play a vital role in shaping policies for adaptation, mitigation, and reducing the risk of disasters. Using machine learning techniques including hybrid black widow optimization (BWO) with XGBoost, LGBoost, and AdaBoost. We generate a flood susceptibility map for considered region of lower mahanadi basin (LMB). This study examines the effectiveness of these machine learning models in assessing and mapping flood susceptibility, while also providing suggestions for future research in this area. Flood susceptibility model was developed using 13 variables: Altitude, Aspect, Curvature, Distance from river, Drainage Density, Stream Power Index (SPI), Sediment Transport Index (STI), Rainfall intensity, Land Use Land Cover (LULC), Topographic Wetness Index (TWI), Terrain Roughness Index (TRI), Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and slope. Additionally, flood inventory data were incorporated into the model. Dataset was divided into a 70% portion for training model and a 30% portion for validating model. To assess the performance of the model, several evaluation metrics were employed, including receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and other performance indices. Evaluation of flood susceptibility mapping, using ROC curve method in combination with flood density yielded strong and reliable results for various models. BWO‐XGBoost achieved a score of 0.889, BWO‐LGBoost achieved a score of 0.937, and BWO‐ADABoost achieved a score of 0.904. These scores indicate effectiveness of these models in accurately predicting flood susceptibility in the study area. A comparison was made with commonly used methods in flood susceptibility assessment to evaluate the efficiency of proposed models. It was found that having a first‐class and enlightening database is crucial for accurately classifying flood types in flood susceptibility mapping. This aspect greatly contributes to improving the overall performance of the model. Among the evaluated methods, the hybrid model BWO‐LGBoost demonstrated better performance compared with others, indicating its effectiveness in accurately predicting flood susceptibility.
期刊介绍:
Transactions in GIS is an international journal which provides a forum for high quality, original research articles, review articles, short notes and book reviews that focus on: - practical and theoretical issues influencing the development of GIS - the collection, analysis, modelling, interpretation and display of spatial data within GIS - the connections between GIS and related technologies - new GIS applications which help to solve problems affecting the natural or built environments, or business