利用距离几何求解器定位地震群:稀疏和单孔 DAS 网络的应用

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Geophysical Journal International Pub Date : 2024-05-12 DOI:10.1093/gji/ggae168
Katinka Tuinstra, Francesco Grigoli, Federica Lanza, Antonio Pio Rinaldi, Andreas Fichtner, Stefan Wiemer
{"title":"利用距离几何求解器定位地震群:稀疏和单孔 DAS 网络的应用","authors":"Katinka Tuinstra, Francesco Grigoli, Federica Lanza, Antonio Pio Rinaldi, Andreas Fichtner, Stefan Wiemer","doi":"10.1093/gji/ggae168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary The determination of seismic event locations with sparse networks or single-borehole systems remains a significant challenge in observational seismology. Leveraging the advantages of the location approach HADES (eartHquake locAtion via Distance gEometry Solvers), which was initially developed for locating clustered seismicity recorded at two stations, through the solution of a Distance Geometry Problem, we present here an improved version of the methodology: HADES-R (HADES-Relative). Where HADES previously needed a minimum of 4 absolutely located master events, HADES-R solves a least-squares problem to find the relative inter-event distances in the cluster, and uses only a single master event to find the locations of all events, and subsequently applies rotational optimizer to find the cluster orientation. It can leverage iterative station combinations if multiple receivers are available, to describe the cluster shape and orientation uncertainty with a bootstrap approach. The improved method requires P- and S-phase arrival picks, a homogeneous velocity model, a single master event with a known location, and an estimate of the cluster width. The approach is benchmarked on the 2019 Ridgecrest sequence recorded at two stations, and applied to two seismic clusters at the FORGE geothermal test site in Utah, USA, with a microseismic monitoring scenario with a DAS in a vertical borehole. Traditional procedures struggle in these settings due to the ill-posed network configuration. The azimuthal ambiguity in such a scenario is partially overcome by the assumption that all events belong to the same cluster around the master event and a cluster width estimate. We are able to find the cluster shape in both cases, although the orientation remains uncertain. HADES-R contributes to an efficient way to locate multiple events simultaneously with minimal prior information. The method’s ability to constrain the cluster shape and location with only one well-located event offers promising implications, especially for environments where limited or specialised instrumentation is in use.","PeriodicalId":12519,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Journal International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Locating clustered seismicity using Distance Geometry Solvers: applications for sparse and single-borehole DAS networks\",\"authors\":\"Katinka Tuinstra, Francesco Grigoli, Federica Lanza, Antonio Pio Rinaldi, Andreas Fichtner, Stefan Wiemer\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/gji/ggae168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary The determination of seismic event locations with sparse networks or single-borehole systems remains a significant challenge in observational seismology. Leveraging the advantages of the location approach HADES (eartHquake locAtion via Distance gEometry Solvers), which was initially developed for locating clustered seismicity recorded at two stations, through the solution of a Distance Geometry Problem, we present here an improved version of the methodology: HADES-R (HADES-Relative). Where HADES previously needed a minimum of 4 absolutely located master events, HADES-R solves a least-squares problem to find the relative inter-event distances in the cluster, and uses only a single master event to find the locations of all events, and subsequently applies rotational optimizer to find the cluster orientation. It can leverage iterative station combinations if multiple receivers are available, to describe the cluster shape and orientation uncertainty with a bootstrap approach. The improved method requires P- and S-phase arrival picks, a homogeneous velocity model, a single master event with a known location, and an estimate of the cluster width. The approach is benchmarked on the 2019 Ridgecrest sequence recorded at two stations, and applied to two seismic clusters at the FORGE geothermal test site in Utah, USA, with a microseismic monitoring scenario with a DAS in a vertical borehole. Traditional procedures struggle in these settings due to the ill-posed network configuration. The azimuthal ambiguity in such a scenario is partially overcome by the assumption that all events belong to the same cluster around the master event and a cluster width estimate. We are able to find the cluster shape in both cases, although the orientation remains uncertain. HADES-R contributes to an efficient way to locate multiple events simultaneously with minimal prior information. The method’s ability to constrain the cluster shape and location with only one well-located event offers promising implications, especially for environments where limited or specialised instrumentation is in use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geophysical Journal International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geophysical Journal International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae168\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Journal International","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae168","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 确定稀疏台网或单钻孔系统的地震事件位置仍然是观测地震学的一项重大挑战。HADES (通过距离几何求解器确定地震位置) 最初是通过解决距离几何问题来确定两个台站记录的群集地震位置的,利用该定位方法的优势,我们在此介绍该方法的改进版本:HADES-R (HADES-Relative)。HADES 以前需要至少 4 个绝对定位的主事件,而 HADES-R 则通过最小二乘法问题求解群集中事件间的相对距离,并只使用单个主事件来求解所有事件的位置,随后使用旋转优化器求解群集方向。如果有多个接收器,它可以利用迭代台站组合,以自举法描述集群形状和方向的不确定性。改进后的方法需要 P 相和 S 相到达选区、均质速度模型、已知位置的单个主事件以及对星团宽度的估计。该方法以两个台站记录的 2019 年 Ridgecrest 序列为基准,并应用于美国犹他州 FORGE 地热试验场的两个地震群,在垂直钻孔中使用 DAS 进行微震监测。由于网络配置的不确定性,传统程序在这种情况下难以发挥作用。假设所有事件都属于主事件周围的同一个群集,并对群集宽度进行估计,从而部分克服了这种情况下的方位角模糊性。在这两种情况下,我们都能找到集群形状,尽管方位仍不确定。HADES-R 是利用最少的先验信息同时定位多个事件的有效方法。该方法只需一个定位良好的事件就能约束星团的形状和位置,这一点具有广阔的前景,特别是在使用有限或专用仪器的环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Locating clustered seismicity using Distance Geometry Solvers: applications for sparse and single-borehole DAS networks
Summary The determination of seismic event locations with sparse networks or single-borehole systems remains a significant challenge in observational seismology. Leveraging the advantages of the location approach HADES (eartHquake locAtion via Distance gEometry Solvers), which was initially developed for locating clustered seismicity recorded at two stations, through the solution of a Distance Geometry Problem, we present here an improved version of the methodology: HADES-R (HADES-Relative). Where HADES previously needed a minimum of 4 absolutely located master events, HADES-R solves a least-squares problem to find the relative inter-event distances in the cluster, and uses only a single master event to find the locations of all events, and subsequently applies rotational optimizer to find the cluster orientation. It can leverage iterative station combinations if multiple receivers are available, to describe the cluster shape and orientation uncertainty with a bootstrap approach. The improved method requires P- and S-phase arrival picks, a homogeneous velocity model, a single master event with a known location, and an estimate of the cluster width. The approach is benchmarked on the 2019 Ridgecrest sequence recorded at two stations, and applied to two seismic clusters at the FORGE geothermal test site in Utah, USA, with a microseismic monitoring scenario with a DAS in a vertical borehole. Traditional procedures struggle in these settings due to the ill-posed network configuration. The azimuthal ambiguity in such a scenario is partially overcome by the assumption that all events belong to the same cluster around the master event and a cluster width estimate. We are able to find the cluster shape in both cases, although the orientation remains uncertain. HADES-R contributes to an efficient way to locate multiple events simultaneously with minimal prior information. The method’s ability to constrain the cluster shape and location with only one well-located event offers promising implications, especially for environments where limited or specialised instrumentation is in use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geophysical Journal International
Geophysical Journal International 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.70%
发文量
436
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Geophysical Journal International publishes top quality research papers, express letters, invited review papers and book reviews on all aspects of theoretical, computational, applied and observational geophysics.
期刊最新文献
A rapid analysis of aftershock processes after a moderate magnitude earthquake with ML-methods Influence of upwelling mantle magmas on cratonic crust implied from Vp/Vs beneath South America platform Observations from the Seafloor: Ultra-low-frequency ambient ocean-bottom nodal seismology at the amendment field Upscaling from Mineral Microstructures to Tectonic Macrostructures Towards a new standard for seismic moment tensor inversion containing 3D Earth structure uncertainty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1