两项全球心理健康研究的跨文化启示:自我提升和同类偏见

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1007/s11469-024-01307-y
Yasuhiro Kotera, Amy Ronaldson, Daniel Hayes, Holly Hunter-Brown, Merly McPhilbin, Danielle Dunnett, Tesnime Jebara, Simran Takhi, Takahiko Masuda, Elizabeth Camacho, Ioannis Bakolis, Julie Repper, Sara Meddings, Vicky Stergiopoulos, Lisa Brophy, Clara De Ruysscher, Michail Okoliyski, Petra Kubinová, Lene Eplov, Charlotte Toernes, Dagmar Narusson, Aurélie Tinland, Bernd Puschner, Ramona Hiltensperger, Fabio Lucchi, Yuki Miyamoto, Stynke Castelein, Marit Borg, Trude Gøril Klevan, Roger Tan Boon Meng, Chatdanai Sornchai, Kruawon Tiengtom, Marianne Farkas, Hannah Moreland Jones, Edith Moore, Ann Butler, Richard Mpango, Samson Tse, Zsuzsa Kondor, Michael Ryan, Gianfranco Zuaboni, Dan Elton, Jason Grant-Rowles, Rebecca McNaughton, Claire Harcla, Wouter Vanderplasschen, Simone Arbour, Denise Silverstone, Ulrika Bejerholm, Candice Powell, Susana Ochoa, Mar Garcia-Franco, Jonna Tolonen, Caroline Yeo, Ashleigh Charles, Jessica Jepps, Adelabu Simpson, Vanessa Kellermann, Olamide Todowe..
{"title":"两项全球心理健康研究的跨文化启示:自我提升和同类偏见","authors":"Yasuhiro Kotera, Amy Ronaldson, Daniel Hayes, Holly Hunter-Brown, Merly McPhilbin, Danielle Dunnett, Tesnime Jebara, Simran Takhi, Takahiko Masuda, Elizabeth Camacho, Ioannis Bakolis, Julie Repper, Sara Meddings, Vicky Stergiopoulos, Lisa Brophy, Clara De Ruysscher, Michail Okoliyski, Petra Kubinová, Lene Eplov, Charlotte Toernes, Dagmar Narusson, Aurélie Tinland, Bernd Puschner, Ramona Hiltensperger, Fabio Lucchi, Yuki Miyamoto, Stynke Castelein, Marit Borg, Trude Gøril Klevan, Roger Tan Boon Meng, Chatdanai Sornchai, Kruawon Tiengtom, Marianne Farkas, Hannah Moreland Jones, Edith Moore, Ann Butler, Richard Mpango, Samson Tse, Zsuzsa Kondor, Michael Ryan, Gianfranco Zuaboni, Dan Elton, Jason Grant-Rowles, Rebecca McNaughton, Claire Harcla, Wouter Vanderplasschen, Simone Arbour, Denise Silverstone, Ulrika Bejerholm, Candice Powell, Susana Ochoa, Mar Garcia-Franco, Jonna Tolonen, Caroline Yeo, Ashleigh Charles, Jessica Jepps, Adelabu Simpson, Vanessa Kellermann, Olamide Todowe..","doi":"10.1007/s11469-024-01307-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This commentary highlights two cross-cultural issues identified from our global mental health (GMH) research, RECOLLECT (Recovery Colleges Characterisation and Testing) 2: self-enhancement and ingroup biases. Self-enhancement is a tendency to maintain and express unrealistically positive self-views. Ingroup biases are differences in one’s evaluation of others belonging to the same social group. These biases are discussed in the context of GMH research using self-report measures across cultures. GMH, a field evolving since its Lancet series introduction in 2007, aims to advance mental health equity and human rights. Despite a 16.5-fold increase in annual GMH studies from 2007 to 2016, cross-cultural understanding remains underdeveloped. We discuss the impact of individualism versus collectivism on self-enhancement and ingroup biases. GMH research using concepts, outcomes, and methods aligned with individualism may give advantages to people and services oriented to individualism. GMH research needs to address these biases arising from cross-cultural differences to achieve its aim.</p>","PeriodicalId":14083,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-Cultural Insights from Two Global Mental Health Studies: Self-Enhancement and Ingroup Biases\",\"authors\":\"Yasuhiro Kotera, Amy Ronaldson, Daniel Hayes, Holly Hunter-Brown, Merly McPhilbin, Danielle Dunnett, Tesnime Jebara, Simran Takhi, Takahiko Masuda, Elizabeth Camacho, Ioannis Bakolis, Julie Repper, Sara Meddings, Vicky Stergiopoulos, Lisa Brophy, Clara De Ruysscher, Michail Okoliyski, Petra Kubinová, Lene Eplov, Charlotte Toernes, Dagmar Narusson, Aurélie Tinland, Bernd Puschner, Ramona Hiltensperger, Fabio Lucchi, Yuki Miyamoto, Stynke Castelein, Marit Borg, Trude Gøril Klevan, Roger Tan Boon Meng, Chatdanai Sornchai, Kruawon Tiengtom, Marianne Farkas, Hannah Moreland Jones, Edith Moore, Ann Butler, Richard Mpango, Samson Tse, Zsuzsa Kondor, Michael Ryan, Gianfranco Zuaboni, Dan Elton, Jason Grant-Rowles, Rebecca McNaughton, Claire Harcla, Wouter Vanderplasschen, Simone Arbour, Denise Silverstone, Ulrika Bejerholm, Candice Powell, Susana Ochoa, Mar Garcia-Franco, Jonna Tolonen, Caroline Yeo, Ashleigh Charles, Jessica Jepps, Adelabu Simpson, Vanessa Kellermann, Olamide Todowe..\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11469-024-01307-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This commentary highlights two cross-cultural issues identified from our global mental health (GMH) research, RECOLLECT (Recovery Colleges Characterisation and Testing) 2: self-enhancement and ingroup biases. Self-enhancement is a tendency to maintain and express unrealistically positive self-views. Ingroup biases are differences in one’s evaluation of others belonging to the same social group. These biases are discussed in the context of GMH research using self-report measures across cultures. GMH, a field evolving since its Lancet series introduction in 2007, aims to advance mental health equity and human rights. Despite a 16.5-fold increase in annual GMH studies from 2007 to 2016, cross-cultural understanding remains underdeveloped. We discuss the impact of individualism versus collectivism on self-enhancement and ingroup biases. GMH research using concepts, outcomes, and methods aligned with individualism may give advantages to people and services oriented to individualism. GMH research needs to address these biases arising from cross-cultural differences to achieve its aim.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-024-01307-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-024-01307-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇评论强调了我们的全球心理健康(GMH)研究--RECOLLECT(康复学院特征描述与测试)2--中发现的两个跨文化问题:自我提升和群体内偏见。自我提升是一种保持和表达不切实际的积极自我观点的倾向。群体内偏见是指一个人对属于同一社会群体的其他人的评价存在差异。这些偏见将在使用跨文化自我报告测量方法的全球心理健康研究中加以讨论。自 2007 年《柳叶刀》丛书推出以来,全球心理健康研究领域不断发展,旨在促进心理健康公平和人权。尽管从 2007 年到 2016 年,每年的全球心理健康研究增加了 16.5 倍,但对跨文化的了解仍然不足。我们讨论了个人主义与集体主义对自我提升和内群体偏见的影响。使用与个人主义相一致的概念、结果和方法进行全球心理健康研究,可能会给以个人主义为导向的人和服务带来优势。全球心理健康研究需要解决跨文化差异带来的这些偏见,以实现其目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cross-Cultural Insights from Two Global Mental Health Studies: Self-Enhancement and Ingroup Biases

This commentary highlights two cross-cultural issues identified from our global mental health (GMH) research, RECOLLECT (Recovery Colleges Characterisation and Testing) 2: self-enhancement and ingroup biases. Self-enhancement is a tendency to maintain and express unrealistically positive self-views. Ingroup biases are differences in one’s evaluation of others belonging to the same social group. These biases are discussed in the context of GMH research using self-report measures across cultures. GMH, a field evolving since its Lancet series introduction in 2007, aims to advance mental health equity and human rights. Despite a 16.5-fold increase in annual GMH studies from 2007 to 2016, cross-cultural understanding remains underdeveloped. We discuss the impact of individualism versus collectivism on self-enhancement and ingroup biases. GMH research using concepts, outcomes, and methods aligned with individualism may give advantages to people and services oriented to individualism. GMH research needs to address these biases arising from cross-cultural differences to achieve its aim.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
2.50%
发文量
245
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Mental Health and Addictions (IJMH) is a publication that specializes in presenting the latest research, policies, causes, literature reviews, prevention, and treatment of mental health and addiction-related topics. It focuses on mental health, substance addictions, behavioral addictions, as well as concurrent mental health and addictive disorders. By publishing peer-reviewed articles of high quality, the journal aims to spark an international discussion on issues related to mental health and addiction and to offer valuable insights into how these conditions impact individuals, families, and societies. The journal covers a wide range of fields, including psychology, sociology, anthropology, criminology, public health, psychiatry, history, and law. It publishes various types of articles, including feature articles, review articles, clinical notes, research notes, letters to the editor, and commentaries. The journal is published six times a year.
期刊最新文献
Differences in smoking cessation behaviors and vaping status among adult daily smokers with and without depression, anxiety, and alcohol use: Findings from the 2018 and 2020 International Tobacco Control Four Country Smoking and Vaping (ITC 4CV) Surveys. Emotion Dysregulation as a Risk Factor for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Stemming from Opioid Overdose Responding Among Community Laypeople. Weight Control Patterns, Substance Use, and Mental Health in Korean Adolescents: A Latent Class Analysis The Association Between Coping and Enhancement Motives of Buying and Four Distinct Dimensions of Pathological Buying Brief Report: a Cross-Sectional Comparison of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test with a Single Question to Assess Alcohol Use in Fishing Communities of Uganda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1