LC-MS/MS 和 EMIT 测量环孢素 A 的全血浓度:这两种方法在后者的动态范围内得出的结果一致,但前者的应用范围更广。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Journal of Chromatography B Pub Date : 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jchromb.2024.124154
Yuan-Yuan Zhang , Hong-Li Guo , Jie Wang , Wei-Jun Wang , Yue Li , Chen-Chao Chu , Chun-Ying Wu , Jian Huang , Ya-Hui Hu , Feng Chen
{"title":"LC-MS/MS 和 EMIT 测量环孢素 A 的全血浓度:这两种方法在后者的动态范围内得出的结果一致,但前者的应用范围更广。","authors":"Yuan-Yuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Hong-Li Guo ,&nbsp;Jie Wang ,&nbsp;Wei-Jun Wang ,&nbsp;Yue Li ,&nbsp;Chen-Chao Chu ,&nbsp;Chun-Ying Wu ,&nbsp;Jian Huang ,&nbsp;Ya-Hui Hu ,&nbsp;Feng Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jchromb.2024.124154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cyclosporine A (CsA) is a widely used immunosuppressive drug with a narrow therapeutic index and large individual differences. Its therapeutic and toxic effects are closely related to blood drug concentrations, requiring routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The current main methods for TDM of CsA are enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). However, few study on the method comparison of the EMIT and LC-MS/MS for the measurement of whole blood CsA concentration in children has been reported. In this study, we developed a simple and sensitive LC-MS/MS assay for the determination of CsA, and 657 cases of CsA concentrations were determined from 197 pediatric patients by a routine EMIT assay and by the validated in-house LC-MS/MS method on the same batch of samples, aimed to address the aforementioned concern. Consistency between the two assays was evaluated using linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis. The linear range of LC-MS/MS was 0.500–2000 ng/mL and that of the EMIT was 40–500 ng/mL, respectively. Overall, the correlation between the two methods was significant (r-value ranging from 0.8842 to 0.9441). Unsatisfactory consistency was observed in the concentrations &lt; 40 ng/mL (<em>r</em> = 0.7325) and 200–500 ng/mL (<em>r</em> = 0.6851). Bland-Altman plot showed a mean bias of −18.0 % (±1.96 SD, −73.8 to 37.8 %) between EMIT and LC-MS/MS. For Passing-Bablok regression between EMIT and LC-MS/MS did not differ significantly (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05). In conclusion, the two methods were closely correlated, but the CsA concentration by LC-MS/MS assay was slightly higher than that by EMIT method. Switching from the EMIT assay to the LC-MS/MS method was acceptable, and the LC-MS/MS method will receive broader application in clinical settings due to its better analytical capabilities, but the results need to be further verified in different laboratories.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":348,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chromatography B","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LC-MS/MS and EMIT measure the whole blood concentration of cyclosporine A: The two methods yield concordant results within the dynamic range of the latter, but the former shows broader application scenarios\",\"authors\":\"Yuan-Yuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Hong-Li Guo ,&nbsp;Jie Wang ,&nbsp;Wei-Jun Wang ,&nbsp;Yue Li ,&nbsp;Chen-Chao Chu ,&nbsp;Chun-Ying Wu ,&nbsp;Jian Huang ,&nbsp;Ya-Hui Hu ,&nbsp;Feng Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jchromb.2024.124154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Cyclosporine A (CsA) is a widely used immunosuppressive drug with a narrow therapeutic index and large individual differences. Its therapeutic and toxic effects are closely related to blood drug concentrations, requiring routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The current main methods for TDM of CsA are enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). However, few study on the method comparison of the EMIT and LC-MS/MS for the measurement of whole blood CsA concentration in children has been reported. In this study, we developed a simple and sensitive LC-MS/MS assay for the determination of CsA, and 657 cases of CsA concentrations were determined from 197 pediatric patients by a routine EMIT assay and by the validated in-house LC-MS/MS method on the same batch of samples, aimed to address the aforementioned concern. Consistency between the two assays was evaluated using linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis. The linear range of LC-MS/MS was 0.500–2000 ng/mL and that of the EMIT was 40–500 ng/mL, respectively. Overall, the correlation between the two methods was significant (r-value ranging from 0.8842 to 0.9441). Unsatisfactory consistency was observed in the concentrations &lt; 40 ng/mL (<em>r</em> = 0.7325) and 200–500 ng/mL (<em>r</em> = 0.6851). Bland-Altman plot showed a mean bias of −18.0 % (±1.96 SD, −73.8 to 37.8 %) between EMIT and LC-MS/MS. For Passing-Bablok regression between EMIT and LC-MS/MS did not differ significantly (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05). In conclusion, the two methods were closely correlated, but the CsA concentration by LC-MS/MS assay was slightly higher than that by EMIT method. Switching from the EMIT assay to the LC-MS/MS method was acceptable, and the LC-MS/MS method will receive broader application in clinical settings due to its better analytical capabilities, but the results need to be further verified in different laboratories.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chromatography B\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chromatography B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570023224001624\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chromatography B","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570023224001624","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

环孢素 A(CsA)是一种广泛使用的免疫抑制剂,其治疗指数较窄,个体差异较大。其治疗和毒性作用与血药浓度密切相关,需要进行常规治疗药物监测(TDM)。目前对 CsA 进行 TDM 的主要方法是酶联免疫分析技术(EMIT)和液相色谱-串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)。然而,关于 EMIT 和 LC-MS/MS 测量儿童全血 CsA 浓度的方法比较研究却鲜有报道。在本研究中,我们开发了一种简单灵敏的 LC-MS/MS 方法来测定 CsA,并采用常规的 EMIT 方法和经过验证的内部 LC-MS/MS 方法测定了来自 197 名儿科患者的 657 例 CsA 浓度,旨在解决上述问题。使用线性回归和 Bland-Altman 分析评估了两种检测方法的一致性。LC-MS/MS 的线性范围为 0.500-2000 纳克/毫升,EMIT 的线性范围为 40-500 纳克/毫升。总体而言,两种方法之间的相关性非常显著(r 值范围为 0.8842 至 0.9441)。在浓度为 0.05 时,一致性不理想。)总之,两种方法密切相关,但 LC-MS/MS 法测定的 CsA 浓度略高于 EMIT 法。从 EMIT 法转换到 LC-MS/MS 法是可以接受的,LC-MS/MS 法因其更好的分析能力将在临床中得到更广泛的应用,但结果还需要在不同的实验室中进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LC-MS/MS and EMIT measure the whole blood concentration of cyclosporine A: The two methods yield concordant results within the dynamic range of the latter, but the former shows broader application scenarios

Cyclosporine A (CsA) is a widely used immunosuppressive drug with a narrow therapeutic index and large individual differences. Its therapeutic and toxic effects are closely related to blood drug concentrations, requiring routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The current main methods for TDM of CsA are enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). However, few study on the method comparison of the EMIT and LC-MS/MS for the measurement of whole blood CsA concentration in children has been reported. In this study, we developed a simple and sensitive LC-MS/MS assay for the determination of CsA, and 657 cases of CsA concentrations were determined from 197 pediatric patients by a routine EMIT assay and by the validated in-house LC-MS/MS method on the same batch of samples, aimed to address the aforementioned concern. Consistency between the two assays was evaluated using linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis. The linear range of LC-MS/MS was 0.500–2000 ng/mL and that of the EMIT was 40–500 ng/mL, respectively. Overall, the correlation between the two methods was significant (r-value ranging from 0.8842 to 0.9441). Unsatisfactory consistency was observed in the concentrations < 40 ng/mL (r = 0.7325) and 200–500 ng/mL (r = 0.6851). Bland-Altman plot showed a mean bias of −18.0 % (±1.96 SD, −73.8 to 37.8 %) between EMIT and LC-MS/MS. For Passing-Bablok regression between EMIT and LC-MS/MS did not differ significantly (p > 0.05). In conclusion, the two methods were closely correlated, but the CsA concentration by LC-MS/MS assay was slightly higher than that by EMIT method. Switching from the EMIT assay to the LC-MS/MS method was acceptable, and the LC-MS/MS method will receive broader application in clinical settings due to its better analytical capabilities, but the results need to be further verified in different laboratories.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chromatography B
Journal of Chromatography B 医学-分析化学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
306
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chromatography B publishes papers on developments in separation science relevant to biology and biomedical research including both fundamental advances and applications. Analytical techniques which may be considered include the various facets of chromatography, electrophoresis and related methods, affinity and immunoaffinity-based methodologies, hyphenated and other multi-dimensional techniques, and microanalytical approaches. The journal also considers articles reporting developments in sample preparation, detection techniques including mass spectrometry, and data handling and analysis. Developments related to preparative separations for the isolation and purification of components of biological systems may be published, including chromatographic and electrophoretic methods, affinity separations, field flow fractionation and other preparative approaches. Applications to the analysis of biological systems and samples will be considered when the analytical science contains a significant element of novelty, e.g. a new approach to the separation of a compound, novel combination of analytical techniques, or significantly improved analytical performance.
期刊最新文献
Development and application of UPLC-Q-Orbitrap HRMS methods for the determination of eight metabolites of p-chloronitrobenzene in human urine Simultaneous determination of total homocysteine, methionine, methylmalonic acid and 2-methylcitric acid in dried blood spots by ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry Optimized isolation and purification of Shaoyao Gancao decoction using macroporous resin Development of LC-MS/MS method for quantification of Lurasidone using volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS); a comparative study between dried blood and plasma samples. Identification and characterization of GSK-9089 metabolites through high resolution-mass spectrometry based in vitro and in vivo rat biological sample analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1