不同类型弱视的眼前庭诱发肌源性电位。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Clinical and Experimental Optometry Pub Date : 2024-05-15 DOI:10.1080/08164622.2024.2352503
Mahdi Sharifi, Sadegh Jafarzadeh, Mohammad Yaser Kiarudi, Samira Hassanzadeh, Masoud Rostami
{"title":"不同类型弱视的眼前庭诱发肌源性电位。","authors":"Mahdi Sharifi, Sadegh Jafarzadeh, Mohammad Yaser Kiarudi, Samira Hassanzadeh, Masoud Rostami","doi":"10.1080/08164622.2024.2352503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The visual system plays an important role in the development of the vestibular-ocular reflex (VOR). In clinical practice, the ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP) test is used to assess contralateral VOR.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>This study sought to compare the oVEMP in patients with anisometropic, strabismic, and mixed amblyopia using unilateral and bilateral (simultaneous binaural) stimulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-two amblyopic patients (20 males and 22 females) with a mean age of 10.48 ± 4.00 years (range: 5 - 20 years) were examined. The Titmus stereopsis test, alternate cover test, and best-corrected visual acuity were evaluated. Patients were divided into three groups: anisometropic, strabismic, and mixed amblyopia. The oVEMP responses including the amplitude of electrical activity (n1-p1 complex) and the latencies (n1 and p1) of the VOR responses were recorded under unilateral and bilateral stimulations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the anisometropic and strabismic group, n1 latency was significantly faster in the non-amblyopic eyes compared to amblyopic eyes (Z = -2.04, <i>p</i> = 0.042, andZ = -2.54, <i>p</i> = 0.024 respectively). Mean p1 latency was significantly faster in the non-amblyopic eyes compared to the amblyopic eyes of the strabismic group (Z = -2.31, <i>p</i> = 0.011)In all groups, the p1 latency was faster in the non-amblyopic eye compared to bilateral stimulation (all, <i>p</i> < 0.05). In all groups, the n1-p1 amplitude was not significantly different between the two eyes, and between each eye and bilateral stimulation (all, <i>p</i> > 0.05). No significant correlation was found between the depth of amblyopia and n1 and p1 responses (all, <i>p</i> > 0.05). In all groups there was no significant difference in the latency of n1 and p1 between the amblyopic eye and bilateral stimulation (all, <i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regardless of its type, amblyopia affects vestibular-ocular reflex responses. Further research is warranted to clarify the effect of the disease and its treatment on the ocular-vestibular system.</p>","PeriodicalId":10214,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Optometry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in different types of amblyopia.\",\"authors\":\"Mahdi Sharifi, Sadegh Jafarzadeh, Mohammad Yaser Kiarudi, Samira Hassanzadeh, Masoud Rostami\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08164622.2024.2352503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The visual system plays an important role in the development of the vestibular-ocular reflex (VOR). In clinical practice, the ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP) test is used to assess contralateral VOR.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>This study sought to compare the oVEMP in patients with anisometropic, strabismic, and mixed amblyopia using unilateral and bilateral (simultaneous binaural) stimulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-two amblyopic patients (20 males and 22 females) with a mean age of 10.48 ± 4.00 years (range: 5 - 20 years) were examined. The Titmus stereopsis test, alternate cover test, and best-corrected visual acuity were evaluated. Patients were divided into three groups: anisometropic, strabismic, and mixed amblyopia. The oVEMP responses including the amplitude of electrical activity (n1-p1 complex) and the latencies (n1 and p1) of the VOR responses were recorded under unilateral and bilateral stimulations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the anisometropic and strabismic group, n1 latency was significantly faster in the non-amblyopic eyes compared to amblyopic eyes (Z = -2.04, <i>p</i> = 0.042, andZ = -2.54, <i>p</i> = 0.024 respectively). Mean p1 latency was significantly faster in the non-amblyopic eyes compared to the amblyopic eyes of the strabismic group (Z = -2.31, <i>p</i> = 0.011)In all groups, the p1 latency was faster in the non-amblyopic eye compared to bilateral stimulation (all, <i>p</i> < 0.05). In all groups, the n1-p1 amplitude was not significantly different between the two eyes, and between each eye and bilateral stimulation (all, <i>p</i> > 0.05). No significant correlation was found between the depth of amblyopia and n1 and p1 responses (all, <i>p</i> > 0.05). In all groups there was no significant difference in the latency of n1 and p1 between the amblyopic eye and bilateral stimulation (all, <i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regardless of its type, amblyopia affects vestibular-ocular reflex responses. Further research is warranted to clarify the effect of the disease and its treatment on the ocular-vestibular system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Optometry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Optometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08164622.2024.2352503\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08164622.2024.2352503","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床意义:视觉系统在前庭-眼反射(VOR)的形成过程中发挥着重要作用。在临床实践中,眼前庭诱发肌源性电位(oVEMP)测试用于评估对侧 VOR:本研究试图通过单侧和双侧(同时双耳)刺激,比较各向异性弱视、斜视和混合性弱视患者的 oVEMP:研究对象为 42 名弱视患者(20 名男性和 22 名女性),平均年龄为 10.48 ± 4.00 岁(5 - 20 岁)。对 Titmus 立体视测试、交替遮盖测试和最佳矫正视力进行了评估。患者被分为三组:各向异性弱视、斜视和混合性弱视。记录了单侧和双侧刺激下的oVEMP反应,包括电活动的振幅(n1-p1复合体)和VOR反应的潜伏期(n1和p1):在各向异性和斜视组中,非弱视眼的 n1 潜伏期明显快于弱视眼(分别为 Z = -2.04,p = 0.042 和 Z = -2.54,p = 0.024)。与弱视眼相比,斜视组非弱视眼的平均p1潜伏期明显更快(Z = -2.31,p = 0.011)。在所有组别中,与双侧刺激相比,非弱视眼的p1潜伏期更快(所有组别,p p > 0.05)。弱视深度与 n1 和 p1 反应之间无明显相关性(所有组别,p > 0.05)。在所有组别中,弱视眼与双侧刺激之间的n1和p1潜伏期无明显差异(所有组别,P > 0.05):结论:无论是哪种类型的弱视,都会影响前庭-眼反射反应。结论:无论是哪种类型的弱视,都会影响前庭-眼反射反应,因此有必要开展进一步研究,以明确弱视及其治疗对眼前庭系统的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in different types of amblyopia.

Clinical relevance: The visual system plays an important role in the development of the vestibular-ocular reflex (VOR). In clinical practice, the ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP) test is used to assess contralateral VOR.

Background: This study sought to compare the oVEMP in patients with anisometropic, strabismic, and mixed amblyopia using unilateral and bilateral (simultaneous binaural) stimulation.

Methods: Forty-two amblyopic patients (20 males and 22 females) with a mean age of 10.48 ± 4.00 years (range: 5 - 20 years) were examined. The Titmus stereopsis test, alternate cover test, and best-corrected visual acuity were evaluated. Patients were divided into three groups: anisometropic, strabismic, and mixed amblyopia. The oVEMP responses including the amplitude of electrical activity (n1-p1 complex) and the latencies (n1 and p1) of the VOR responses were recorded under unilateral and bilateral stimulations.

Results: In the anisometropic and strabismic group, n1 latency was significantly faster in the non-amblyopic eyes compared to amblyopic eyes (Z = -2.04, p = 0.042, andZ = -2.54, p = 0.024 respectively). Mean p1 latency was significantly faster in the non-amblyopic eyes compared to the amblyopic eyes of the strabismic group (Z = -2.31, p = 0.011)In all groups, the p1 latency was faster in the non-amblyopic eye compared to bilateral stimulation (all, p < 0.05). In all groups, the n1-p1 amplitude was not significantly different between the two eyes, and between each eye and bilateral stimulation (all, p > 0.05). No significant correlation was found between the depth of amblyopia and n1 and p1 responses (all, p > 0.05). In all groups there was no significant difference in the latency of n1 and p1 between the amblyopic eye and bilateral stimulation (all, p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Regardless of its type, amblyopia affects vestibular-ocular reflex responses. Further research is warranted to clarify the effect of the disease and its treatment on the ocular-vestibular system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Optometry is a peer reviewed journal listed by ISI and abstracted by PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Citation Index and Current Contents. It publishes original research papers and reviews in clinical optometry and vision science. Debate and discussion of controversial scientific and clinical issues is encouraged and letters to the Editor and short communications expressing points of view on matters within the Journal''s areas of interest are welcome. The Journal is published six times annually.
期刊最新文献
Post traumatic focal globe rupture. Professor Sharon Bentley: optometric leadership personified. Retinopathy of prematurity screening: can the examination time be reduced? A chart-based test of contrast sensitivity in noise: reference ranges, effects of age and optical abnormality. Forty-year odyssey to Refsum disease diagnosis: impact of diagnostic delay on effective treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1