救护车为超急性期中风患者提供强化降压治疗。

IF 96.2 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL New England Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-30 Epub Date: 2024-05-16 DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2314741
Gang Li, Yapeng Lin, Jie Yang, Craig S Anderson, Chen Chen, Feifeng Liu, Laurent Billot, Qiang Li, Xiaoying Chen, Xiaoqiu Liu, Xinwen Ren, Chunfang Zhang, Ping Xu, Lijun Wu, Feng Wang, Daijun Qiu, Mei Jiang, Yiqian Peng, Chaohui Li, Yiyang Huang, Xiaohui Zhao, Jiye Liang, Yao Wang, Xiangjun Wu, Xiaoyun Xu, Guofang Chen, Dongya Huang, Yue Zhang, Lian Zuo, Guozhao Ma, Yumei Yang, Junjie Hao, Xiahong Xu, Xinli Xiong, Yueyu Tang, Yijia Guo, Jianping Yu, Shuping Li, Song He, Fengkai Mao, Quandan Tan, Song Tan, Nengwei Yu, Ruxiang Xu, Mingwei Sun, Binghu Li, Jiang Guo, Leibo Liu, Hueiming Liu, Menglu Ouyang, Lei Si, Hisatomi Arima, Philip M Bath, Gary A Ford, Thompson Robinson, Else Charlotte Sandset, Jeffrey L Saver, Nikola Sprigg, H Bart van der Worp, Lili Song
{"title":"救护车为超急性期中风患者提供强化降压治疗。","authors":"Gang Li, Yapeng Lin, Jie Yang, Craig S Anderson, Chen Chen, Feifeng Liu, Laurent Billot, Qiang Li, Xiaoying Chen, Xiaoqiu Liu, Xinwen Ren, Chunfang Zhang, Ping Xu, Lijun Wu, Feng Wang, Daijun Qiu, Mei Jiang, Yiqian Peng, Chaohui Li, Yiyang Huang, Xiaohui Zhao, Jiye Liang, Yao Wang, Xiangjun Wu, Xiaoyun Xu, Guofang Chen, Dongya Huang, Yue Zhang, Lian Zuo, Guozhao Ma, Yumei Yang, Junjie Hao, Xiahong Xu, Xinli Xiong, Yueyu Tang, Yijia Guo, Jianping Yu, Shuping Li, Song He, Fengkai Mao, Quandan Tan, Song Tan, Nengwei Yu, Ruxiang Xu, Mingwei Sun, Binghu Li, Jiang Guo, Leibo Liu, Hueiming Liu, Menglu Ouyang, Lei Si, Hisatomi Arima, Philip M Bath, Gary A Ford, Thompson Robinson, Else Charlotte Sandset, Jeffrey L Saver, Nikola Sprigg, H Bart van der Worp, Lili Song","doi":"10.1056/NEJMoa2314741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment of acute stroke, before a distinction can be made between ischemic and hemorrhagic types, is challenging. Whether very early blood-pressure control in the ambulance improves outcomes among patients with undifferentiated acute stroke is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomly assigned patients with suspected acute stroke that caused a motor deficit and with elevated systolic blood pressure (≥150 mm Hg), who were assessed in the ambulance within 2 hours after the onset of symptoms, to receive immediate treatment to lower the systolic blood pressure (target range, 130 to 140 mm Hg) (intervention group) or usual blood-pressure management (usual-care group). The primary efficacy outcome was functional status as assessed by the score on the modified Rankin scale (range, 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]) at 90 days after randomization. The primary safety outcome was any serious adverse event.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2404 patients (mean age, 70 years) in China underwent randomization and provided consent for the trial: 1205 in the intervention group and 1199 in the usual-care group. The median time between symptom onset and randomization was 61 minutes (interquartile range, 41 to 93), and the mean blood pressure at randomization was 178/98 mm Hg. Stroke was subsequently confirmed by imaging in 2240 patients, of whom 1041 (46.5%) had a hemorrhagic stroke. At the time of patients' arrival at the hospital, the mean systolic blood pressure in the intervention group was 159 mm Hg, as compared with 170 mm Hg in the usual-care group. Overall, there was no difference in functional outcome between the two groups (common odds ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87 to 1.15), and the incidence of serious adverse events was similar in the two groups. Prehospital reduction of blood pressure was associated with a decrease in the odds of a poor functional outcome among patients with hemorrhagic stroke (common odds ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.92) but an increase among patients with cerebral ischemia (common odds ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.60).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this trial, prehospital blood-pressure reduction did not improve functional outcomes in a cohort of patients with undifferentiated acute stroke, of whom 46.5% subsequently received a diagnosis of hemorrhagic stroke. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and others; INTERACT4 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03790800; Chinese Trial Registry number, ChiCTR1900020534.).</p>","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":96.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intensive Ambulance-Delivered Blood-Pressure Reduction in Hyperacute Stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Gang Li, Yapeng Lin, Jie Yang, Craig S Anderson, Chen Chen, Feifeng Liu, Laurent Billot, Qiang Li, Xiaoying Chen, Xiaoqiu Liu, Xinwen Ren, Chunfang Zhang, Ping Xu, Lijun Wu, Feng Wang, Daijun Qiu, Mei Jiang, Yiqian Peng, Chaohui Li, Yiyang Huang, Xiaohui Zhao, Jiye Liang, Yao Wang, Xiangjun Wu, Xiaoyun Xu, Guofang Chen, Dongya Huang, Yue Zhang, Lian Zuo, Guozhao Ma, Yumei Yang, Junjie Hao, Xiahong Xu, Xinli Xiong, Yueyu Tang, Yijia Guo, Jianping Yu, Shuping Li, Song He, Fengkai Mao, Quandan Tan, Song Tan, Nengwei Yu, Ruxiang Xu, Mingwei Sun, Binghu Li, Jiang Guo, Leibo Liu, Hueiming Liu, Menglu Ouyang, Lei Si, Hisatomi Arima, Philip M Bath, Gary A Ford, Thompson Robinson, Else Charlotte Sandset, Jeffrey L Saver, Nikola Sprigg, H Bart van der Worp, Lili Song\",\"doi\":\"10.1056/NEJMoa2314741\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment of acute stroke, before a distinction can be made between ischemic and hemorrhagic types, is challenging. Whether very early blood-pressure control in the ambulance improves outcomes among patients with undifferentiated acute stroke is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomly assigned patients with suspected acute stroke that caused a motor deficit and with elevated systolic blood pressure (≥150 mm Hg), who were assessed in the ambulance within 2 hours after the onset of symptoms, to receive immediate treatment to lower the systolic blood pressure (target range, 130 to 140 mm Hg) (intervention group) or usual blood-pressure management (usual-care group). The primary efficacy outcome was functional status as assessed by the score on the modified Rankin scale (range, 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]) at 90 days after randomization. The primary safety outcome was any serious adverse event.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2404 patients (mean age, 70 years) in China underwent randomization and provided consent for the trial: 1205 in the intervention group and 1199 in the usual-care group. The median time between symptom onset and randomization was 61 minutes (interquartile range, 41 to 93), and the mean blood pressure at randomization was 178/98 mm Hg. Stroke was subsequently confirmed by imaging in 2240 patients, of whom 1041 (46.5%) had a hemorrhagic stroke. At the time of patients' arrival at the hospital, the mean systolic blood pressure in the intervention group was 159 mm Hg, as compared with 170 mm Hg in the usual-care group. Overall, there was no difference in functional outcome between the two groups (common odds ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87 to 1.15), and the incidence of serious adverse events was similar in the two groups. Prehospital reduction of blood pressure was associated with a decrease in the odds of a poor functional outcome among patients with hemorrhagic stroke (common odds ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.92) but an increase among patients with cerebral ischemia (common odds ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.60).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this trial, prehospital blood-pressure reduction did not improve functional outcomes in a cohort of patients with undifferentiated acute stroke, of whom 46.5% subsequently received a diagnosis of hemorrhagic stroke. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and others; INTERACT4 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03790800; Chinese Trial Registry number, ChiCTR1900020534.).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New England Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":96.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New England Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2314741\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New England Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2314741","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在区分缺血性和出血性脑卒中之前,急性脑卒中的治疗具有挑战性。在救护车上尽早控制血压是否能改善未分型急性中风患者的预后尚不确定:我们随机分配了在症状出现后 2 小时内在救护车上接受评估的疑似急性卒中患者,让他们接受立即降低收缩压的治疗(目标范围为 130 至 140 mm Hg)(干预组)或常规血压管理(常规护理组)。主要疗效指标是随机分组后90天的功能状态,以改良Rankin量表评分(范围从0[无症状]到6[死亡])来评估。主要安全性结果为任何严重不良事件:中国共有 2404 名患者(平均年龄 70 岁)接受了随机分组并同意参加试验:干预组1205人,常规护理组1199人。从症状出现到随机化之间的中位时间为 61 分钟(四分位间范围为 41 至 93),随机化时的平均血压为 178/98 mm Hg。随后有 2240 名患者通过影像学检查确诊为中风,其中 1041 人(46.5%)为出血性中风。患者到达医院时,干预组的平均收缩压为 158 mm Hg,而常规护理组为 170 mm Hg。总体而言,两组患者的功能预后没有差异(常见几率比为 1.00;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.87 至 1.15),两组患者的严重不良事件发生率相似。院前降压与出血性卒中患者功能预后不良几率的降低有关(常见几率比为 0.75;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.60 至 0.92),但与脑缺血患者功能预后不良几率的增加有关(常见几率比为 1.30;95% 置信区间 [CI],1.06 至 1.60):在这项试验中,院前降压并不能改善未分化急性中风患者的功能预后,其中 46.5% 的患者随后被诊断为出血性中风。(由澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究委员会等资助;INTERACT4 ClinicalTrials.gov 编号:NCT03790800;中国试验登记编号:ChiCTR1900020534)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intensive Ambulance-Delivered Blood-Pressure Reduction in Hyperacute Stroke.

Background: Treatment of acute stroke, before a distinction can be made between ischemic and hemorrhagic types, is challenging. Whether very early blood-pressure control in the ambulance improves outcomes among patients with undifferentiated acute stroke is uncertain.

Methods: We randomly assigned patients with suspected acute stroke that caused a motor deficit and with elevated systolic blood pressure (≥150 mm Hg), who were assessed in the ambulance within 2 hours after the onset of symptoms, to receive immediate treatment to lower the systolic blood pressure (target range, 130 to 140 mm Hg) (intervention group) or usual blood-pressure management (usual-care group). The primary efficacy outcome was functional status as assessed by the score on the modified Rankin scale (range, 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]) at 90 days after randomization. The primary safety outcome was any serious adverse event.

Results: A total of 2404 patients (mean age, 70 years) in China underwent randomization and provided consent for the trial: 1205 in the intervention group and 1199 in the usual-care group. The median time between symptom onset and randomization was 61 minutes (interquartile range, 41 to 93), and the mean blood pressure at randomization was 178/98 mm Hg. Stroke was subsequently confirmed by imaging in 2240 patients, of whom 1041 (46.5%) had a hemorrhagic stroke. At the time of patients' arrival at the hospital, the mean systolic blood pressure in the intervention group was 159 mm Hg, as compared with 170 mm Hg in the usual-care group. Overall, there was no difference in functional outcome between the two groups (common odds ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87 to 1.15), and the incidence of serious adverse events was similar in the two groups. Prehospital reduction of blood pressure was associated with a decrease in the odds of a poor functional outcome among patients with hemorrhagic stroke (common odds ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.92) but an increase among patients with cerebral ischemia (common odds ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.60).

Conclusions: In this trial, prehospital blood-pressure reduction did not improve functional outcomes in a cohort of patients with undifferentiated acute stroke, of whom 46.5% subsequently received a diagnosis of hemorrhagic stroke. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and others; INTERACT4 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03790800; Chinese Trial Registry number, ChiCTR1900020534.).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New England Journal of Medicine
New England Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
145.40
自引率
0.60%
发文量
1839
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) stands as the foremost medical journal and website worldwide. With an impressive history spanning over two centuries, NEJM boasts a consistent publication of superb, peer-reviewed research and engaging clinical content. Our primary objective revolves around delivering high-caliber information and findings at the juncture of biomedical science and clinical practice. We strive to present this knowledge in formats that are not only comprehensible but also hold practical value, effectively influencing healthcare practices and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement for Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis. Compared with What? Measuring AI against the Health Care We Have “Blessed Be the Fruit” — The Contemporary Rise of Pronatalism Chvostek’s Sign in Familial Hypoparathyroidism APOL1 Bi- and Monoallelic Variants and Chronic Kidney Disease in West Africans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1