缺血性中风后癫痫发作风险对驾驶的影响。

IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1136/jnnp-2024-333505
Kai Michael Schubert, Giulio Bicciato, Lucia Sinka, Laura Abraira, Estevo Santamarina, José Álvarez-Sabín, Carolina Ferreira-Atuesta, Mira Katan, Natalie Scherrer, Robert Terziev, Nico Döhler, Barbara Erdélyi-Canavese, Ansgar Felbecker, Philip Siebel, Michael Winklehner, Tim J von Oertzen, Judith N Wagner, Gian Luigi Gigli, Annacarmen Nilo, Francesco Janes, Giovanni Merlino, Mariarosaria Valente, María Paula Zafra-Sierra, Luis Carlos Mayor-Romero, Julian Conrad, S Evers, Piergiorgio Lochner, Frauke Roell, Francesco Brigo, Carla Bentes, Rita Peralta, Teresa Pinho E Melo, Mark R Keezer, John Sidney Duncan, Josemir W Sander, Barbara Tettenborn, Matthias Koepp, Marian Galovic
{"title":"缺血性中风后癫痫发作风险对驾驶的影响。","authors":"Kai Michael Schubert, Giulio Bicciato, Lucia Sinka, Laura Abraira, Estevo Santamarina, José Álvarez-Sabín, Carolina Ferreira-Atuesta, Mira Katan, Natalie Scherrer, Robert Terziev, Nico Döhler, Barbara Erdélyi-Canavese, Ansgar Felbecker, Philip Siebel, Michael Winklehner, Tim J von Oertzen, Judith N Wagner, Gian Luigi Gigli, Annacarmen Nilo, Francesco Janes, Giovanni Merlino, Mariarosaria Valente, María Paula Zafra-Sierra, Luis Carlos Mayor-Romero, Julian Conrad, S Evers, Piergiorgio Lochner, Frauke Roell, Francesco Brigo, Carla Bentes, Rita Peralta, Teresa Pinho E Melo, Mark R Keezer, John Sidney Duncan, Josemir W Sander, Barbara Tettenborn, Matthias Koepp, Marian Galovic","doi":"10.1136/jnnp-2024-333505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In addition to other stroke-related deficits, the risk of seizures may impact driving ability after stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed data from a multicentre international cohort, including 4452 adults with acute ischaemic stroke and no prior seizures. We calculated the Chance of Occurrence of Seizure in the next Year (COSY) according to the SeLECT<sub>2.0</sub> prognostic model. We considered COSY<20% safe for private and <2% for professional driving, aligning with commonly used cut-offs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seizure risks in the next year were mainly influenced by the baseline risk-stratified according to the SeLECT<sub>2.0</sub> score and, to a lesser extent, by the poststroke seizure-free interval (SFI). Those without acute symptomatic seizures (SeLECT<sub>2.0</sub> 0-6 points) had low COSY (0.7%-11%) immediately after stroke, not requiring an SFI. In stroke survivors with acute symptomatic seizures (SeLECT<sub>2.0</sub> 3-13 points), COSY after a 3-month SFI ranged from 2% to 92%, showing substantial interindividual variability. Stroke survivors with acute symptomatic status epilepticus (SeLECT<sub>2.0</sub> 7-13 points) had the highest risk (14%-92%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Personalised prognostic models, such as SeLECT<sub>2.0</sub>, may offer better guidance for poststroke driving decisions than generic SFIs. Our findings provide practical tools, including a smartphone-based or web-based application, to assess seizure risks and determine appropriate SFIs for safe driving.</p>","PeriodicalId":16418,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implications for driving based on the risk of seizures after ischaemic stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Kai Michael Schubert, Giulio Bicciato, Lucia Sinka, Laura Abraira, Estevo Santamarina, José Álvarez-Sabín, Carolina Ferreira-Atuesta, Mira Katan, Natalie Scherrer, Robert Terziev, Nico Döhler, Barbara Erdélyi-Canavese, Ansgar Felbecker, Philip Siebel, Michael Winklehner, Tim J von Oertzen, Judith N Wagner, Gian Luigi Gigli, Annacarmen Nilo, Francesco Janes, Giovanni Merlino, Mariarosaria Valente, María Paula Zafra-Sierra, Luis Carlos Mayor-Romero, Julian Conrad, S Evers, Piergiorgio Lochner, Frauke Roell, Francesco Brigo, Carla Bentes, Rita Peralta, Teresa Pinho E Melo, Mark R Keezer, John Sidney Duncan, Josemir W Sander, Barbara Tettenborn, Matthias Koepp, Marian Galovic\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jnnp-2024-333505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In addition to other stroke-related deficits, the risk of seizures may impact driving ability after stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed data from a multicentre international cohort, including 4452 adults with acute ischaemic stroke and no prior seizures. We calculated the Chance of Occurrence of Seizure in the next Year (COSY) according to the SeLECT<sub>2.0</sub> prognostic model. We considered COSY<20% safe for private and <2% for professional driving, aligning with commonly used cut-offs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seizure risks in the next year were mainly influenced by the baseline risk-stratified according to the SeLECT<sub>2.0</sub> score and, to a lesser extent, by the poststroke seizure-free interval (SFI). Those without acute symptomatic seizures (SeLECT<sub>2.0</sub> 0-6 points) had low COSY (0.7%-11%) immediately after stroke, not requiring an SFI. In stroke survivors with acute symptomatic seizures (SeLECT<sub>2.0</sub> 3-13 points), COSY after a 3-month SFI ranged from 2% to 92%, showing substantial interindividual variability. Stroke survivors with acute symptomatic status epilepticus (SeLECT<sub>2.0</sub> 7-13 points) had the highest risk (14%-92%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Personalised prognostic models, such as SeLECT<sub>2.0</sub>, may offer better guidance for poststroke driving decisions than generic SFIs. Our findings provide practical tools, including a smartphone-based or web-based application, to assess seizure risks and determine appropriate SFIs for safe driving.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2024-333505\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2024-333505","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:除了其他与中风相关的缺陷外,癫痫发作的风险可能会影响中风后的驾驶能力:除了其他与中风相关的缺陷外,癫痫发作的风险可能会影响中风后的驾驶能力:我们分析了一个多中心国际队列的数据,其中包括 4452 名患有急性缺血性中风且之前没有癫痫发作的成年人。我们根据 SeLECT2.0 预后模型计算了未来一年癫痫发作的几率(COSY)。我们认为 COSYResults:下一年的癫痫发作风险主要受根据SeLECT2.0评分进行的基线风险分级的影响,其次受卒中后无发作间期(SFI)的影响。没有急性症状发作(SeLECT2.0 0-6 分)的患者卒中后立即的 COSY 很低(0.7%-11%),不需要 SFI。在有急性症状发作(SeLECT2.0 3-13 分)的卒中幸存者中,3 个月 SFI 后的 COSY 从 2% 到 92% 不等,显示出很大的个体差异。患有急性症状状态癫痫(SeLECT2.0 7-13分)的卒中幸存者风险最高(14%-92%):与通用的 SFI 相比,SeLECT2.0 等个性化预后模型可为卒中后的驾驶决策提供更好的指导。我们的研究结果提供了实用的工具,包括基于智能手机或网络的应用程序,以评估癫痫发作风险并确定适当的 SFIs,从而实现安全驾驶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implications for driving based on the risk of seizures after ischaemic stroke.

Background: In addition to other stroke-related deficits, the risk of seizures may impact driving ability after stroke.

Methods: We analysed data from a multicentre international cohort, including 4452 adults with acute ischaemic stroke and no prior seizures. We calculated the Chance of Occurrence of Seizure in the next Year (COSY) according to the SeLECT2.0 prognostic model. We considered COSY<20% safe for private and <2% for professional driving, aligning with commonly used cut-offs.

Results: Seizure risks in the next year were mainly influenced by the baseline risk-stratified according to the SeLECT2.0 score and, to a lesser extent, by the poststroke seizure-free interval (SFI). Those without acute symptomatic seizures (SeLECT2.0 0-6 points) had low COSY (0.7%-11%) immediately after stroke, not requiring an SFI. In stroke survivors with acute symptomatic seizures (SeLECT2.0 3-13 points), COSY after a 3-month SFI ranged from 2% to 92%, showing substantial interindividual variability. Stroke survivors with acute symptomatic status epilepticus (SeLECT2.0 7-13 points) had the highest risk (14%-92%).

Conclusions: Personalised prognostic models, such as SeLECT2.0, may offer better guidance for poststroke driving decisions than generic SFIs. Our findings provide practical tools, including a smartphone-based or web-based application, to assess seizure risks and determine appropriate SFIs for safe driving.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
1.80%
发文量
888
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (JNNP) aspires to publish groundbreaking and cutting-edge research worldwide. Covering the entire spectrum of neurological sciences, the journal focuses on common disorders like stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, epilepsy, peripheral neuropathy, subarachnoid haemorrhage, and neuropsychiatry, while also addressing complex challenges such as ALS. With early online publication, regular podcasts, and an extensive archive collection boasting the longest half-life in clinical neuroscience journals, JNNP aims to be a trailblazer in the field.
期刊最新文献
Apheresis therapies in MOGAD: a retrospective study of 117 therapeutic interventions in 571 attacks. Response to: 'Cortical Inexcitability in ALS: Correlating a Clinical Phenotype'. MYH7-related myopathies: clinical, myopathological and genotypic spectrum in a multicentre French cohort. Huntington's disease phenocopy syndromes revisited: a clinical comparison and next-generation sequencing exploration. Exercise as medicine in Parkinson's disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1