Jack Badawy MD, Matthew Sakumoto MD, Elizabeth Murphy MD, David Schmit MD, Christine Davis MS, Ankur Segon MD, MPH, Andrew Auerbach MD, Marisha Burden MD, MBA
{"title":"打破障碍,建设师资队伍:定性分析探索医院医学学术领域的师资发展。","authors":"Jack Badawy MD, Matthew Sakumoto MD, Elizabeth Murphy MD, David Schmit MD, Christine Davis MS, Ankur Segon MD, MPH, Andrew Auerbach MD, Marisha Burden MD, MBA","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Hospital medicine (HM) continues to be primarily composed of junior hospitalists and research has highlighted a paucity of mentors and academic output. Faculty advancement programs have been identified as a means to support junior hospitalists in their career trajectories and to advance the field. The optimal approach to supporting faculty development (FD) efforts is not known.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To understand hospitalist groups' approaches to FD, including efforts that were perceived to be effective, and to identify barriers as well as potential future directions for FD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Rapid qualitative methods were utilized including templated summaries and matrix analysis to identify major themes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting and Participants</h3>\n \n <p>Virtual focus groups with hospitalists in the Hospital Medicine Reengineering Network (HOMERuN).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome and Measures</h3>\n \n <p>Qualitative themes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Nineteen individuals from 17 unique institutions from across the United States in May 2022 participated in seven focus groups. Four key themes emerged from the study and included (1) academic hospitalist programs face multifaceted challenges and barriers to FD in HM, (2) groups have embraced a diversity of structures and frameworks, (3) due to clinical volumes, FD programs have had to adapt and evolve to meet FD needs, and (4) participants identified multiple areas for improvement, including defining tangible outcomes of FD programs and creating a repository of FD material which can be shared widely.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breaking barriers, building faculty: A qualitative analysis to exploring faculty development in academic hospital medicine\",\"authors\":\"Jack Badawy MD, Matthew Sakumoto MD, Elizabeth Murphy MD, David Schmit MD, Christine Davis MS, Ankur Segon MD, MPH, Andrew Auerbach MD, Marisha Burden MD, MBA\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jhm.13406\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Hospital medicine (HM) continues to be primarily composed of junior hospitalists and research has highlighted a paucity of mentors and academic output. Faculty advancement programs have been identified as a means to support junior hospitalists in their career trajectories and to advance the field. The optimal approach to supporting faculty development (FD) efforts is not known.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To understand hospitalist groups' approaches to FD, including efforts that were perceived to be effective, and to identify barriers as well as potential future directions for FD.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Rapid qualitative methods were utilized including templated summaries and matrix analysis to identify major themes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Setting and Participants</h3>\\n \\n <p>Virtual focus groups with hospitalists in the Hospital Medicine Reengineering Network (HOMERuN).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Outcome and Measures</h3>\\n \\n <p>Qualitative themes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Nineteen individuals from 17 unique institutions from across the United States in May 2022 participated in seven focus groups. Four key themes emerged from the study and included (1) academic hospitalist programs face multifaceted challenges and barriers to FD in HM, (2) groups have embraced a diversity of structures and frameworks, (3) due to clinical volumes, FD programs have had to adapt and evolve to meet FD needs, and (4) participants identified multiple areas for improvement, including defining tangible outcomes of FD programs and creating a repository of FD material which can be shared widely.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhm.13406\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhm.13406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Breaking barriers, building faculty: A qualitative analysis to exploring faculty development in academic hospital medicine
Background
Hospital medicine (HM) continues to be primarily composed of junior hospitalists and research has highlighted a paucity of mentors and academic output. Faculty advancement programs have been identified as a means to support junior hospitalists in their career trajectories and to advance the field. The optimal approach to supporting faculty development (FD) efforts is not known.
Objective
To understand hospitalist groups' approaches to FD, including efforts that were perceived to be effective, and to identify barriers as well as potential future directions for FD.
Design
Rapid qualitative methods were utilized including templated summaries and matrix analysis to identify major themes.
Setting and Participants
Virtual focus groups with hospitalists in the Hospital Medicine Reengineering Network (HOMERuN).
Main Outcome and Measures
Qualitative themes.
Results
Nineteen individuals from 17 unique institutions from across the United States in May 2022 participated in seven focus groups. Four key themes emerged from the study and included (1) academic hospitalist programs face multifaceted challenges and barriers to FD in HM, (2) groups have embraced a diversity of structures and frameworks, (3) due to clinical volumes, FD programs have had to adapt and evolve to meet FD needs, and (4) participants identified multiple areas for improvement, including defining tangible outcomes of FD programs and creating a repository of FD material which can be shared widely.