间作和调亏灌溉对西北干旱区饲用玉米产量、水土资源利用率和经济效益的影响

IF 5.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Agricultural Water Management Pub Date : 2024-05-14 DOI:10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108876
Maojian Wang, Wei Shi, Muhammad Kamran, Shenghua Chang, Qianmin Jia, Fujiang Hou
{"title":"间作和调亏灌溉对西北干旱区饲用玉米产量、水土资源利用率和经济效益的影响","authors":"Maojian Wang,&nbsp;Wei Shi,&nbsp;Muhammad Kamran,&nbsp;Shenghua Chang,&nbsp;Qianmin Jia,&nbsp;Fujiang Hou","doi":"10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Intercropping has been widely recognized to have great advantages in terms of increasing yield, controlling pests and diseases, and saving land, particularly in developing countries. Regulated deficit irrigation reduces water consumption and improves water productivity (WP). However, it is unclear whether the combination of intercropping and deficit irrigation could improve crop yield and WP simultaneously. In this experiment, three planting modes, including forage maize (<em>Zea mays</em> L.) monoculture (M), lablab bean (<em>Lablab purpureus</em> L.) monoculture (L), and maize-lablab bean intercropping (ML) were used. Six irrigation modes were set for each planting mode, including severe water deficit (W1), late water deficit (W2), alternate water deficit (W3), late moderate water deficit (W4), early moderate water deficit (W5), and full irrigation (W6). Results showed that compared with M, the ML treatment significantly increased the fresh forage yield (9.8%–17.0%), hay yield (9.5%–13.1%), crude protein yield (22.9%–25.9%), and WP (7.8%–8.7%). The W5 treatment achieved similar fresh forage yield, hay yield, and crude protein yield as that of the W6 treatment but reduced irrigation water by 25% and increased the WP (21.9%–24.8%). Intercropping achieved a high-water equivalence ratio (WER;1.52–1.81) and land equivalence ratio (LER;1.56–1.84), indicating its advantages over monocultures. The W6 treatment had the lowest WER and LER, suggesting that excessive irrigation can reduce the efficiency of utilizing land and water resource in maze-based forage production. Among all treatments, ML–W5 achieved the highest net income and output to input ratio. Overall, intercropping of forage maize and lablab bean with moderate deficit irrigation at an early stage could be used as a high-yield and efficient forage production system in the arid areas of northwest China.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7634,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Water Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424002117/pdfft?md5=edae90c1721e655468f611fe1dfd9171&pid=1-s2.0-S0378377424002117-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of intercropping and regulated deficit irrigation on the yield, water and land resource utilization, and economic benefits of forage maize in arid region of Northwest China\",\"authors\":\"Maojian Wang,&nbsp;Wei Shi,&nbsp;Muhammad Kamran,&nbsp;Shenghua Chang,&nbsp;Qianmin Jia,&nbsp;Fujiang Hou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Intercropping has been widely recognized to have great advantages in terms of increasing yield, controlling pests and diseases, and saving land, particularly in developing countries. Regulated deficit irrigation reduces water consumption and improves water productivity (WP). However, it is unclear whether the combination of intercropping and deficit irrigation could improve crop yield and WP simultaneously. In this experiment, three planting modes, including forage maize (<em>Zea mays</em> L.) monoculture (M), lablab bean (<em>Lablab purpureus</em> L.) monoculture (L), and maize-lablab bean intercropping (ML) were used. Six irrigation modes were set for each planting mode, including severe water deficit (W1), late water deficit (W2), alternate water deficit (W3), late moderate water deficit (W4), early moderate water deficit (W5), and full irrigation (W6). Results showed that compared with M, the ML treatment significantly increased the fresh forage yield (9.8%–17.0%), hay yield (9.5%–13.1%), crude protein yield (22.9%–25.9%), and WP (7.8%–8.7%). The W5 treatment achieved similar fresh forage yield, hay yield, and crude protein yield as that of the W6 treatment but reduced irrigation water by 25% and increased the WP (21.9%–24.8%). Intercropping achieved a high-water equivalence ratio (WER;1.52–1.81) and land equivalence ratio (LER;1.56–1.84), indicating its advantages over monocultures. The W6 treatment had the lowest WER and LER, suggesting that excessive irrigation can reduce the efficiency of utilizing land and water resource in maze-based forage production. Among all treatments, ML–W5 achieved the highest net income and output to input ratio. Overall, intercropping of forage maize and lablab bean with moderate deficit irrigation at an early stage could be used as a high-yield and efficient forage production system in the arid areas of northwest China.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Water Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424002117/pdfft?md5=edae90c1721e655468f611fe1dfd9171&pid=1-s2.0-S0378377424002117-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Water Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424002117\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Water Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424002117","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们普遍认为,间作套种在提高产量、控制病虫害和节约土地方面有很大优势,尤其是在发展中国家。有节制的亏缺灌溉可减少耗水量,提高水分生产率(WP)。然而,间作与亏缺灌溉相结合能否同时提高作物产量和水分生产率尚不清楚。本试验采用了三种种植模式,包括饲用玉米(Zea mays L.)单作(M)、马褂豆(Lablab purpureus L.)单作(L)和玉米-马褂豆间作(ML)。每种种植模式设置了六种灌溉模式,包括严重缺水(W1)、晚期缺水(W2)、交替缺水(W3)、晚期中度缺水(W4)、早期中度缺水(W5)和全面灌溉(W6)。结果表明,与M处理相比,ML处理显著提高了新鲜牧草产量(9.8%-17.0%)、干草产量(9.5%-13.1%)、粗蛋白产量(22.9%-25.9%)和可湿性粉剂产量(7.8%-8.7%)。W5 处理的新鲜牧草产量、干草产量和粗蛋白产量与 W6 处理相似,但灌溉用水量减少了 25%,可湿性粉剂产量增加了(21.9%-24.8%)。间作的水分当量比(WER;1.52-1.81)和土地当量比(LER;1.56-1.84)都很高,这表明间作比单作更有优势。W6 处理的 WER 和 LER 最低,表明过度灌溉会降低迷宫式饲草生产的水土资源利用效率。在所有处理中,ML-W5 的净收入和产出投入比最高。总之,在中国西北干旱地区,早期适度亏缺灌溉并间作饲用玉米和马褂豆可作为一种高产高效的饲草生产系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of intercropping and regulated deficit irrigation on the yield, water and land resource utilization, and economic benefits of forage maize in arid region of Northwest China

Intercropping has been widely recognized to have great advantages in terms of increasing yield, controlling pests and diseases, and saving land, particularly in developing countries. Regulated deficit irrigation reduces water consumption and improves water productivity (WP). However, it is unclear whether the combination of intercropping and deficit irrigation could improve crop yield and WP simultaneously. In this experiment, three planting modes, including forage maize (Zea mays L.) monoculture (M), lablab bean (Lablab purpureus L.) monoculture (L), and maize-lablab bean intercropping (ML) were used. Six irrigation modes were set for each planting mode, including severe water deficit (W1), late water deficit (W2), alternate water deficit (W3), late moderate water deficit (W4), early moderate water deficit (W5), and full irrigation (W6). Results showed that compared with M, the ML treatment significantly increased the fresh forage yield (9.8%–17.0%), hay yield (9.5%–13.1%), crude protein yield (22.9%–25.9%), and WP (7.8%–8.7%). The W5 treatment achieved similar fresh forage yield, hay yield, and crude protein yield as that of the W6 treatment but reduced irrigation water by 25% and increased the WP (21.9%–24.8%). Intercropping achieved a high-water equivalence ratio (WER;1.52–1.81) and land equivalence ratio (LER;1.56–1.84), indicating its advantages over monocultures. The W6 treatment had the lowest WER and LER, suggesting that excessive irrigation can reduce the efficiency of utilizing land and water resource in maze-based forage production. Among all treatments, ML–W5 achieved the highest net income and output to input ratio. Overall, intercropping of forage maize and lablab bean with moderate deficit irrigation at an early stage could be used as a high-yield and efficient forage production system in the arid areas of northwest China.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Water Management
Agricultural Water Management 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
14.90%
发文量
648
审稿时长
4.9 months
期刊介绍: Agricultural Water Management publishes papers of international significance relating to the science, economics, and policy of agricultural water management. In all cases, manuscripts must address implications and provide insight regarding agricultural water management.
期刊最新文献
Multi-objective modeling and optimization of water distribution for canal system considering irrigation coverage in artesian irrigation district Supplementary irrigation with ceramic emitter promotes Platycladus orientalis growth by enhancing soil bacterial α diversity under extremely high-temperature Interaction between burial depth and N source in drip-fertigated maize: Agronomic performance and correlation with spectral indices Comprehensive analysis on investigating water-saving potentials of irrigated cotton in semi-arid area in China Advancing in satellite-based models coupled with reanalysis agrometeorological data for improving the irrigation management under the European Water Framework Directive
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1