并购中的前景理论:历史收购价格会影响并购报价溢价和公告回报吗?

IF 4.3 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1016/j.jbef.2024.100931
Beni Lauterbach , Yevgeny Mugerman , Joshua Shemesh
{"title":"并购中的前景理论:历史收购价格会影响并购报价溢价和公告回报吗?","authors":"Beni Lauterbach ,&nbsp;Yevgeny Mugerman ,&nbsp;Joshua Shemesh","doi":"10.1016/j.jbef.2024.100931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Prospect Theory suggests that when the pre-offer market price is below the historical purchase price, target shareholders may be reluctant to accept a merger offer, because it requires realizing nominal losses. In a sample of all U.S. public firm merger offers in 1990–2019, we find that the acquirer partially compensates target shareholders, including retail investors, for their losses via a higher offer premium. Consistent with Prospect Theory, the marginal compensation decreases with loss size and is higher in cash-only deals. We also show that the extra premium paid hurts (boosts) acquirer (target) shareholders' wealth.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100931"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214635024000467/pdfft?md5=1f2772bb8704e345f9a3adf8f4b348fe&pid=1-s2.0-S2214635024000467-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospect theory in M&A: Do historical purchase prices affect merger offer premiums and announcement returns?\",\"authors\":\"Beni Lauterbach ,&nbsp;Yevgeny Mugerman ,&nbsp;Joshua Shemesh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbef.2024.100931\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Prospect Theory suggests that when the pre-offer market price is below the historical purchase price, target shareholders may be reluctant to accept a merger offer, because it requires realizing nominal losses. In a sample of all U.S. public firm merger offers in 1990–2019, we find that the acquirer partially compensates target shareholders, including retail investors, for their losses via a higher offer premium. Consistent with Prospect Theory, the marginal compensation decreases with loss size and is higher in cash-only deals. We also show that the extra premium paid hurts (boosts) acquirer (target) shareholders' wealth.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance\",\"volume\":\"42 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100931\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214635024000467/pdfft?md5=1f2772bb8704e345f9a3adf8f4b348fe&pid=1-s2.0-S2214635024000467-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214635024000467\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214635024000467","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前景理论认为,当收购前的市场价格低于历史收购价格时,目标股东可能不愿意接受并购要约,因为这需要实现名义上的损失。在 1990-2019 年所有美国上市公司并购要约的样本中,我们发现收购方会通过提高要约溢价来部分补偿目标股东(包括散户投资者)的损失。与前景理论一致的是,边际补偿随着损失规模的扩大而递减,并且在纯现金交易中更高。我们还表明,额外支付的溢价会损害(提升)收购方(目标)股东的财富。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prospect theory in M&A: Do historical purchase prices affect merger offer premiums and announcement returns?

Prospect Theory suggests that when the pre-offer market price is below the historical purchase price, target shareholders may be reluctant to accept a merger offer, because it requires realizing nominal losses. In a sample of all U.S. public firm merger offers in 1990–2019, we find that the acquirer partially compensates target shareholders, including retail investors, for their losses via a higher offer premium. Consistent with Prospect Theory, the marginal compensation decreases with loss size and is higher in cash-only deals. We also show that the extra premium paid hurts (boosts) acquirer (target) shareholders' wealth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
75
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Behavioral and Experimental Finance represent lenses and approaches through which we can view financial decision-making. The aim of the journal is to publish high quality research in all fields of finance, where such research is carried out with a behavioral perspective and / or is carried out via experimental methods. It is open to but not limited to papers which cover investigations of biases, the role of various neurological markers in financial decision making, national and organizational culture as it impacts financial decision making, sentiment and asset pricing, the design and implementation of experiments to investigate financial decision making and trading, methodological experiments, and natural experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance welcomes full-length and short letter papers in the area of behavioral finance and experimental finance. The focus is on rapid dissemination of high-impact research in these areas.
期刊最新文献
Riding the waves of investor sentiment: Cryptocurrency price and renewable energy volatility during the pandemic-war era Investor horizon, experience, and the disposition effect What makes depression babies different: Expectations or preferences? Luck in high-stakes firm lottery allocation: A natural experimental test of Coasean efficiency and invariance in a prominent sport finance setting Religion and household saving behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1