多发性硬化症患者的事件相关电位与认知功能障碍之间的关系:系统综述

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Neurophysiology Pub Date : 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1016/j.clinph.2024.04.024
Joana Almeida Ferreira , Nuno Pinto , Tiago Maricoto , Maria Vaz Pato
{"title":"多发性硬化症患者的事件相关电位与认知功能障碍之间的关系:系统综述","authors":"Joana Almeida Ferreira ,&nbsp;Nuno Pinto ,&nbsp;Tiago Maricoto ,&nbsp;Maria Vaz Pato","doi":"10.1016/j.clinph.2024.04.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This systematic review aimed to evaluate if event-related potentials (ERPs) can be a relevant tool for cognitive dysfunction diagnosis in Multiple Sclerosis (MS).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Four databases were consulted (PubMed, Embase, Scielo, and Web of Science). The included studies should include adults with clear MS diagnoses, independently of having cognitive complaints, and all should have been submitted to ERPs (P300, N400 or mismatch negativity (MMN)). The main outcomes evaluated were ERPs’ amplitude and/or latency.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>425 studies were obtained initially from all databases, with 26 studies fulfilling the eligibility criteria. P300 was the most used ERP (25 studies), showing a reduced amplitude or an increased latency in 84% of those. N400 was evaluated in one study, showing also abnormal results. MMN was addressed in two studies with inconsistent findings. Some studies further suggest that ERPs may show earlier abnormal results compared with neuropsychological tests.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Most MS patient groups revealed ERP abnormalities, suggesting that these neurophysiological tests may be a relevant and appropriate diagnostic aid method for cognitive impairment in MS.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>The use of ERPs in MS patients seems able to demonstrate cognitive impairment and its use should be considered as part of the regular patient evaluation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10671,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245724001494/pdfft?md5=495b8e2fe2ca3933a0d9e5ddd95afeb0&pid=1-s2.0-S1388245724001494-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship between event-related potentials and cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Joana Almeida Ferreira ,&nbsp;Nuno Pinto ,&nbsp;Tiago Maricoto ,&nbsp;Maria Vaz Pato\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinph.2024.04.024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This systematic review aimed to evaluate if event-related potentials (ERPs) can be a relevant tool for cognitive dysfunction diagnosis in Multiple Sclerosis (MS).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Four databases were consulted (PubMed, Embase, Scielo, and Web of Science). The included studies should include adults with clear MS diagnoses, independently of having cognitive complaints, and all should have been submitted to ERPs (P300, N400 or mismatch negativity (MMN)). The main outcomes evaluated were ERPs’ amplitude and/or latency.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>425 studies were obtained initially from all databases, with 26 studies fulfilling the eligibility criteria. P300 was the most used ERP (25 studies), showing a reduced amplitude or an increased latency in 84% of those. N400 was evaluated in one study, showing also abnormal results. MMN was addressed in two studies with inconsistent findings. Some studies further suggest that ERPs may show earlier abnormal results compared with neuropsychological tests.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Most MS patient groups revealed ERP abnormalities, suggesting that these neurophysiological tests may be a relevant and appropriate diagnostic aid method for cognitive impairment in MS.</p></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><p>The use of ERPs in MS patients seems able to demonstrate cognitive impairment and its use should be considered as part of the regular patient evaluation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245724001494/pdfft?md5=495b8e2fe2ca3933a0d9e5ddd95afeb0&pid=1-s2.0-S1388245724001494-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245724001494\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245724001494","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本系统综述旨在评估事件相关电位(ERPs)是否可作为诊断多发性硬化症(MS)认知功能障碍的相关工具。方法 查阅了四个数据库(PubMed、Embase、Scielo 和 Web of Science)。所纳入的研究应包括明确诊断为多发性硬化症的成人,且不包括认知方面的主诉,所有研究都应进行过 ERP(P300、N400 或错配负性(MMN))检测。评估的主要结果是ERP的振幅和/或潜伏期。结果最初从所有数据库中获得了425项研究,其中26项研究符合资格标准。P300 是使用最多的 ERP(25 项研究),其中 84% 的研究显示振幅减小或潜伏期延长。一项研究对 N400 进行了评估,结果也显示异常。有两项研究对 MMN 进行了评估,但结果并不一致。一些研究进一步表明,与神经心理学测试相比,ERP 可能更早地显示出异常结果。结论大多数多发性硬化症患者组都显示出 ERP 异常,这表明这些神经生理学测试可能是多发性硬化症认知障碍的一种相关且适当的辅助诊断方法。意义在多发性硬化症患者中使用 ERP 似乎能够显示出认知障碍,应将其作为常规患者评估的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Relationship between event-related potentials and cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review

Objective

This systematic review aimed to evaluate if event-related potentials (ERPs) can be a relevant tool for cognitive dysfunction diagnosis in Multiple Sclerosis (MS).

Methods

Four databases were consulted (PubMed, Embase, Scielo, and Web of Science). The included studies should include adults with clear MS diagnoses, independently of having cognitive complaints, and all should have been submitted to ERPs (P300, N400 or mismatch negativity (MMN)). The main outcomes evaluated were ERPs’ amplitude and/or latency.

Results

425 studies were obtained initially from all databases, with 26 studies fulfilling the eligibility criteria. P300 was the most used ERP (25 studies), showing a reduced amplitude or an increased latency in 84% of those. N400 was evaluated in one study, showing also abnormal results. MMN was addressed in two studies with inconsistent findings. Some studies further suggest that ERPs may show earlier abnormal results compared with neuropsychological tests.

Conclusions

Most MS patient groups revealed ERP abnormalities, suggesting that these neurophysiological tests may be a relevant and appropriate diagnostic aid method for cognitive impairment in MS.

Significance

The use of ERPs in MS patients seems able to demonstrate cognitive impairment and its use should be considered as part of the regular patient evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neurophysiology
Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
6.40%
发文量
932
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: As of January 1999, The journal Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, and its two sections Electromyography and Motor Control and Evoked Potentials have amalgamated to become this journal - Clinical Neurophysiology. Clinical Neurophysiology is the official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Brazilian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Czech Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, the Italian Clinical Neurophysiology Society and the International Society of Intraoperative Neurophysiology.The journal is dedicated to fostering research and disseminating information on all aspects of both normal and abnormal functioning of the nervous system. The key aim of the publication is to disseminate scholarly reports on the pathophysiology underlying diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system of human patients. Clinical trials that use neurophysiological measures to document change are encouraged, as are manuscripts reporting data on integrated neuroimaging of central nervous function including, but not limited to, functional MRI, MEG, EEG, PET and other neuroimaging modalities.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Infant sleep spindle measures from EEG improve prediction of cerebral palsy Insights into EEG dynamics and network changes preceding dream enactment behaviors in REM sleep behavior disorder The effect of common parameters of bipolar stimulation on brain evoked potentials Determining predictive value of intraoperative electroencephalography changes for delirium development after cardiovascular surgeries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1