在 COVID-19 大流行期间使用口罩对健康医护人员的生命体征和头痛的影响:一项基于医院的横断面研究

IF 5.4 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Journal of hazardous materials advances Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hazadv.2024.100431
Edris Hoseinzadeh , Farshid Mohammadi , Mahta Razaghi , Ramin Mansuri , Sara Alipour , Mahdi Safari , SOKAN-ADEAGA Adewale Allen
{"title":"在 COVID-19 大流行期间使用口罩对健康医护人员的生命体征和头痛的影响:一项基于医院的横断面研究","authors":"Edris Hoseinzadeh ,&nbsp;Farshid Mohammadi ,&nbsp;Mahta Razaghi ,&nbsp;Ramin Mansuri ,&nbsp;Sara Alipour ,&nbsp;Mahdi Safari ,&nbsp;SOKAN-ADEAGA Adewale Allen","doi":"10.1016/j.hazadv.2024.100431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The study aimed to assess the impact of wearing protective facial masks (PFMs) on various health parameters of hospital staff amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of wearing a face mask on blood oxygen saturation, heart rate, headache, fatigue, and shortness of breath in hospital staff during routine work shifts and COVID-19. In this study, participants from various clinical, administrative, and hospital cleaning professions who had at least one month of work experience were enrolled and their oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>), heart rate (HR), and headache were measured during routine shifts with normal daily activities. The fatigue severity scale (FSS) and the modified Borg dyspnea scale were used to assess the participants. The significance level was set at 0.05. SpO<sub>2</sub> and HR were lower at the end of the work shift than at the beginning (93.96 ± 1.57 vs. 95.03 ± 1.7 and 82.1 ± 11.83 vs. 83.93 ± 12.31, respectively). According to the result of the Borg scale, 59.2 % of the participants did not feel short of breath and 34.3 % had “mild-moderate” shortness of breath. The total FSS (21.46 ± 2.31) showed that the participants did not fall into the “fatigued” category. The Kruskal-Wallis test showed no significant difference in Borg score, FSS, HR, and SpO<sub>2</sub> participants with different mask types (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). The result of the Kruskal-Wallis test also showed no significant difference in Borg score between the occupational groups (<em>P</em> = 0.073). The results showed that the frequency of pre-existing headaches had increased in 18.2 % of the respondents. The findings indicated that wearing PFMs did not have a notable impact on oxygen levels and heart rate during the regular tasks of hospital staff. However, the use of PFMs led to the development of new headaches associated with PFMs or worsened existing headaches.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hazardous materials advances","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100431"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772416624000329/pdfft?md5=297b43512e6a55bbf15ecff6c3a6ca47&pid=1-s2.0-S2772416624000329-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of the use of face masks on the vital signs and headache of healthy healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A hospital-based cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Edris Hoseinzadeh ,&nbsp;Farshid Mohammadi ,&nbsp;Mahta Razaghi ,&nbsp;Ramin Mansuri ,&nbsp;Sara Alipour ,&nbsp;Mahdi Safari ,&nbsp;SOKAN-ADEAGA Adewale Allen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hazadv.2024.100431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The study aimed to assess the impact of wearing protective facial masks (PFMs) on various health parameters of hospital staff amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of wearing a face mask on blood oxygen saturation, heart rate, headache, fatigue, and shortness of breath in hospital staff during routine work shifts and COVID-19. In this study, participants from various clinical, administrative, and hospital cleaning professions who had at least one month of work experience were enrolled and their oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>), heart rate (HR), and headache were measured during routine shifts with normal daily activities. The fatigue severity scale (FSS) and the modified Borg dyspnea scale were used to assess the participants. The significance level was set at 0.05. SpO<sub>2</sub> and HR were lower at the end of the work shift than at the beginning (93.96 ± 1.57 vs. 95.03 ± 1.7 and 82.1 ± 11.83 vs. 83.93 ± 12.31, respectively). According to the result of the Borg scale, 59.2 % of the participants did not feel short of breath and 34.3 % had “mild-moderate” shortness of breath. The total FSS (21.46 ± 2.31) showed that the participants did not fall into the “fatigued” category. The Kruskal-Wallis test showed no significant difference in Borg score, FSS, HR, and SpO<sub>2</sub> participants with different mask types (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). The result of the Kruskal-Wallis test also showed no significant difference in Borg score between the occupational groups (<em>P</em> = 0.073). The results showed that the frequency of pre-existing headaches had increased in 18.2 % of the respondents. The findings indicated that wearing PFMs did not have a notable impact on oxygen levels and heart rate during the regular tasks of hospital staff. However, the use of PFMs led to the development of new headaches associated with PFMs or worsened existing headaches.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of hazardous materials advances\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100431\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772416624000329/pdfft?md5=297b43512e6a55bbf15ecff6c3a6ca47&pid=1-s2.0-S2772416624000329-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of hazardous materials advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772416624000329\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hazardous materials advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772416624000329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究旨在评估在 COVID-19 大流行期间,佩戴防护口罩(PFM)对医院工作人员各种健康参数的影响。本研究旨在调查佩戴口罩对医院员工在例行轮班和 COVID-19 期间的血氧饱和度、心率、头痛、疲劳和气短的影响。在这项研究中,来自临床、行政和医院清洁等不同专业且至少有一个月工作经验的人员参与了研究,并在正常日常活动的例行轮班中测量了他们的血氧饱和度(SpO2)、心率(HR)和头痛。采用疲劳严重程度量表(FSS)和改良博格呼吸困难量表对参与者进行评估。显著性水平设定为 0.05。工作结束时的 SpO2 和心率低于工作开始时(分别为 93.96 ± 1.57 对 95.03 ± 1.7 和 82.1 ± 11.83 对 83.93 ± 12.31)。根据博格量表的结果,59.2%的参与者没有感到气短,34.3%的参与者有 "轻度-中度 "气短。总 FSS(21.46 ± 2.31)表明,参与者不属于 "疲劳 "类别。Kruskal-Wallis 检验显示,不同口罩类型的参与者在 Borg 评分、FSS、心率和 SpO2 方面无明显差异(P > 0.05)。Kruskal-Wallis 检验结果也显示,职业组之间的 Borg 评分无明显差异(P = 0.073)。结果显示,18.2% 的受访者原有头痛的频率有所增加。研究结果表明,佩戴 PFM 对医院工作人员在执行常规任务时的血氧水平和心率没有明显影响。然而,使用 PFMs 会导致与 PFMs 相关的新头痛的发生或加重已有的头痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of the use of face masks on the vital signs and headache of healthy healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A hospital-based cross-sectional study

The study aimed to assess the impact of wearing protective facial masks (PFMs) on various health parameters of hospital staff amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of wearing a face mask on blood oxygen saturation, heart rate, headache, fatigue, and shortness of breath in hospital staff during routine work shifts and COVID-19. In this study, participants from various clinical, administrative, and hospital cleaning professions who had at least one month of work experience were enrolled and their oxygen saturation (SpO2), heart rate (HR), and headache were measured during routine shifts with normal daily activities. The fatigue severity scale (FSS) and the modified Borg dyspnea scale were used to assess the participants. The significance level was set at 0.05. SpO2 and HR were lower at the end of the work shift than at the beginning (93.96 ± 1.57 vs. 95.03 ± 1.7 and 82.1 ± 11.83 vs. 83.93 ± 12.31, respectively). According to the result of the Borg scale, 59.2 % of the participants did not feel short of breath and 34.3 % had “mild-moderate” shortness of breath. The total FSS (21.46 ± 2.31) showed that the participants did not fall into the “fatigued” category. The Kruskal-Wallis test showed no significant difference in Borg score, FSS, HR, and SpO2 participants with different mask types (P > 0.05). The result of the Kruskal-Wallis test also showed no significant difference in Borg score between the occupational groups (P = 0.073). The results showed that the frequency of pre-existing headaches had increased in 18.2 % of the respondents. The findings indicated that wearing PFMs did not have a notable impact on oxygen levels and heart rate during the regular tasks of hospital staff. However, the use of PFMs led to the development of new headaches associated with PFMs or worsened existing headaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of hazardous materials advances
Journal of hazardous materials advances Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
50 days
期刊最新文献
Levels, sources and toxicity assessment of PCBs in surface and groundwater in Nigeria: A systematic review Degradation of antibiotics by homogeneous and heterogeneous Fenton processes: A review Field versus laboratory measurements of PFAS sorption by soils and sediments Photocatalytic degradation of antibiotics in water via TiO2-x: Research needs for technological advancements Process optimization for silica dissolution from e-waste as a sustainable step towards bioremediation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1