落在后面:党派身份、股市参与和财富不平等

IF 3.6 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Banking & Finance Pub Date : 2024-05-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107201
Da Ke
{"title":"落在后面:党派身份、股市参与和财富不平等","authors":"Da Ke","doi":"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper investigates whether and how opposing partisans differ in their wealth accumulation. Using microdata from a longitudinal U.S. household survey, I document that Democrats are on average 11% less likely than Republicans to participate in the stock market. Moreover, the partisan gap widens sharply, by 13%, under Democratic presidencies, precisely when the stock market returns are substantially higher. This dynamic pattern accounts for more than half of the discrepancy in wealth accumulation between Democrats and Republicans over presidential cycles. A decomposition exercise uncovers two underlying forces in opposite directions: while the partisan gap in stock market participation through directly held investment accounts narrows during Democratic presidencies, the narrowing gap is dominated by the widening partisan gap in stock market participation through retirement accounts during the same periods. I further provide speculative evidence that the widening gap is related to job changes, and in particular, entrepreneurship entry.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Banking & Finance","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 107201"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Left behind: Partisan identity, stock market participation, and wealth inequality\",\"authors\":\"Da Ke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper investigates whether and how opposing partisans differ in their wealth accumulation. Using microdata from a longitudinal U.S. household survey, I document that Democrats are on average 11% less likely than Republicans to participate in the stock market. Moreover, the partisan gap widens sharply, by 13%, under Democratic presidencies, precisely when the stock market returns are substantially higher. This dynamic pattern accounts for more than half of the discrepancy in wealth accumulation between Democrats and Republicans over presidential cycles. A decomposition exercise uncovers two underlying forces in opposite directions: while the partisan gap in stock market participation through directly held investment accounts narrows during Democratic presidencies, the narrowing gap is dominated by the widening partisan gap in stock market participation through retirement accounts during the same periods. I further provide speculative evidence that the widening gap is related to job changes, and in particular, entrepreneurship entry.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Banking & Finance\",\"volume\":\"164 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Banking & Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378426624001183\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Banking & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378426624001183","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了对立党派在财富积累方面是否存在差异以及如何存在差异。利用美国家庭纵向调查的微观数据,我记录了民主党人参与股票市场的可能性平均比共和党人低 11%。此外,在民主党担任总统期间,党派差距急剧扩大了 13%,而这正是股市回报率大幅提高的时候。这种动态模式占了民主党和共和党在总统任期内财富积累差距的一半以上。分解研究发现了两种方向相反的潜在力量:在民主党总统任期内,通过直接持有的投资账户参与股市的党派差距缩小了,而在同一时期,通过退休账户参与股市的党派差距扩大了,从而主导了差距的缩小。我进一步提供了推测性证据,证明差距的扩大与工作变动,尤其是创业有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Left behind: Partisan identity, stock market participation, and wealth inequality

This paper investigates whether and how opposing partisans differ in their wealth accumulation. Using microdata from a longitudinal U.S. household survey, I document that Democrats are on average 11% less likely than Republicans to participate in the stock market. Moreover, the partisan gap widens sharply, by 13%, under Democratic presidencies, precisely when the stock market returns are substantially higher. This dynamic pattern accounts for more than half of the discrepancy in wealth accumulation between Democrats and Republicans over presidential cycles. A decomposition exercise uncovers two underlying forces in opposite directions: while the partisan gap in stock market participation through directly held investment accounts narrows during Democratic presidencies, the narrowing gap is dominated by the widening partisan gap in stock market participation through retirement accounts during the same periods. I further provide speculative evidence that the widening gap is related to job changes, and in particular, entrepreneurship entry.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.40%
发文量
262
期刊介绍: The Journal of Banking and Finance (JBF) publishes theoretical and empirical research papers spanning all the major research fields in finance and banking. The aim of the Journal of Banking and Finance is to provide an outlet for the increasing flow of scholarly research concerning financial institutions and the money and capital markets within which they function. The Journal''s emphasis is on theoretical developments and their implementation, empirical, applied, and policy-oriented research in banking and other domestic and international financial institutions and markets. The Journal''s purpose is to improve communications between, and within, the academic and other research communities and policymakers and operational decision makers at financial institutions - private and public, national and international, and their regulators. The Journal is one of the largest Finance journals, with approximately 1500 new submissions per year, mainly in the following areas: Asset Management; Asset Pricing; Banking (Efficiency, Regulation, Risk Management, Solvency); Behavioural Finance; Capital Structure; Corporate Finance; Corporate Governance; Derivative Pricing and Hedging; Distribution Forecasting with Financial Applications; Entrepreneurial Finance; Empirical Finance; Financial Economics; Financial Markets (Alternative, Bonds, Currency, Commodity, Derivatives, Equity, Energy, Real Estate); FinTech; Fund Management; General Equilibrium Models; High-Frequency Trading; Intermediation; International Finance; Hedge Funds; Investments; Liquidity; Market Efficiency; Market Microstructure; Mergers and Acquisitions; Networks; Performance Analysis; Political Risk; Portfolio Optimization; Regulation of Financial Markets and Institutions; Risk Management and Analysis; Systemic Risk; Term Structure Models; Venture Capital.
期刊最新文献
Three decades of failed bank acquisitions Factor momentum versus price momentum: Insights from international markets Editorial Board Does maker-taker limit order subsidy improve market outcomes? Quasi-natural experimental evidence Does regulatory and supervisory independence affect financial stability?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1