高使用率休闲目的地的空间内位移:利用空间分析探索游客行为

IF 3.6 3区 管理学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management Pub Date : 2024-05-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jort.2024.100770
Susan A. Sidder , Troy E. Hall
{"title":"高使用率休闲目的地的空间内位移:利用空间分析探索游客行为","authors":"Susan A. Sidder ,&nbsp;Troy E. Hall","doi":"10.1016/j.jort.2024.100770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Crowding and congestion in parks and protected areas can prompt visitors to use behavioral coping strategies, including intra-site spatial displacement, where visitors rearrange themselves spatially within a recreation destination, seeking unoccupied areas. To date, intra-site displacement has primarily been measured using aspatial survey, interview, or observational methods. Using an explicitly spatial approach combining GPS tracking of visitor groups and concurrently collected estimates of use, we hypothesized a pattern of spatial spreading characteristic of intra-site displacement as use levels increased at three popular day hiking recreation destinations in Yosemite National Park, USA. Using nearest neighbor hierarchical cluster analysis, we quantified patterns in spatial behavior data collected at low, moderate, and high use times at each location. We used three measures of spatial behavior (time spent in all clusters, time spent in entry portal clusters, and percent of groups visiting clusters) to explore how visitor use of clusters varies by use level. Across these metrics, we mostly found no evidence of intra-site displacement as use levels increased. Our results suggest that the relationship between use level and intra-site displacement is nuanced, and other factors such as visitor and site characteristics should be explored in future research. Methodologically, our lack of findings using spatial analyses suggest that findings from self-reported aspatial data collection techniques may overstate the occurrence of intra-site displacement. We discuss implications for managing social and ecological conditions at high use recreation destinations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46931,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 100770"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intra-spatial displacement at high-use recreation destinations: Employing spatial analyses to explore visitor behavior\",\"authors\":\"Susan A. Sidder ,&nbsp;Troy E. Hall\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jort.2024.100770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Crowding and congestion in parks and protected areas can prompt visitors to use behavioral coping strategies, including intra-site spatial displacement, where visitors rearrange themselves spatially within a recreation destination, seeking unoccupied areas. To date, intra-site displacement has primarily been measured using aspatial survey, interview, or observational methods. Using an explicitly spatial approach combining GPS tracking of visitor groups and concurrently collected estimates of use, we hypothesized a pattern of spatial spreading characteristic of intra-site displacement as use levels increased at three popular day hiking recreation destinations in Yosemite National Park, USA. Using nearest neighbor hierarchical cluster analysis, we quantified patterns in spatial behavior data collected at low, moderate, and high use times at each location. We used three measures of spatial behavior (time spent in all clusters, time spent in entry portal clusters, and percent of groups visiting clusters) to explore how visitor use of clusters varies by use level. Across these metrics, we mostly found no evidence of intra-site displacement as use levels increased. Our results suggest that the relationship between use level and intra-site displacement is nuanced, and other factors such as visitor and site characteristics should be explored in future research. Methodologically, our lack of findings using spatial analyses suggest that findings from self-reported aspatial data collection techniques may overstate the occurrence of intra-site displacement. We discuss implications for managing social and ecological conditions at high use recreation destinations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management\",\"volume\":\"46 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100770\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213078024000380\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213078024000380","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公园和保护区内的拥挤和拥堵会促使游客采取行为应对策略,包括景点内空间位移,即游客在休闲目的地内重新安排自己的空间,寻找无人区域。迄今为止,主要采用非空间调查、访谈或观察法来测量景点内的空间位移。我们采用明确的空间方法,将游客群体的 GPS 跟踪与同时收集的使用估算相结合,假设在美国优胜美地国家公园的三个热门一日徒步休闲目的地,随着使用水平的提高,会出现具有景点内迁移特征的空间扩散模式。利用近邻分层聚类分析,我们对每个地点在低度、中度和高度使用时间收集到的空间行为数据进行了量化。我们使用了三种空间行为测量方法(在所有聚类中花费的时间、在入口聚类中花费的时间以及访问聚类的团体百分比)来探索不同使用水平的游客对聚类的使用是如何变化的。在这些指标中,我们大多没有发现随着使用水平的提高而出现景点内迁移的迹象。我们的研究结果表明,使用水平与景点内迁移之间的关系是微妙的,在未来的研究中还应探讨游客和景点特征等其他因素。在方法论上,我们缺乏使用空间分析得出的结果,这表明通过自我报告的空间数据收集技术得出的结果可能会夸大遗址内迁移的发生。我们讨论了在高使用率娱乐目的地管理社会和生态条件的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intra-spatial displacement at high-use recreation destinations: Employing spatial analyses to explore visitor behavior

Crowding and congestion in parks and protected areas can prompt visitors to use behavioral coping strategies, including intra-site spatial displacement, where visitors rearrange themselves spatially within a recreation destination, seeking unoccupied areas. To date, intra-site displacement has primarily been measured using aspatial survey, interview, or observational methods. Using an explicitly spatial approach combining GPS tracking of visitor groups and concurrently collected estimates of use, we hypothesized a pattern of spatial spreading characteristic of intra-site displacement as use levels increased at three popular day hiking recreation destinations in Yosemite National Park, USA. Using nearest neighbor hierarchical cluster analysis, we quantified patterns in spatial behavior data collected at low, moderate, and high use times at each location. We used three measures of spatial behavior (time spent in all clusters, time spent in entry portal clusters, and percent of groups visiting clusters) to explore how visitor use of clusters varies by use level. Across these metrics, we mostly found no evidence of intra-site displacement as use levels increased. Our results suggest that the relationship between use level and intra-site displacement is nuanced, and other factors such as visitor and site characteristics should be explored in future research. Methodologically, our lack of findings using spatial analyses suggest that findings from self-reported aspatial data collection techniques may overstate the occurrence of intra-site displacement. We discuss implications for managing social and ecological conditions at high use recreation destinations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism offers a dedicated outlet for research relevant to social sciences and natural resources. The journal publishes peer reviewed original research on all aspects of outdoor recreation planning and management, covering the entire spectrum of settings from wilderness to urban outdoor recreation opportunities. It also focuses on new products and findings in nature based tourism and park management. JORT is an interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary journal, articles may focus on any aspect of theory, method, or concept of outdoor recreation research, planning or management, and interdisciplinary work is especially welcome, and may be of a theoretical and/or a case study nature. Depending on the topic of investigation, articles may be positioned within one academic discipline, or draw from several disciplines in an integrative manner, with overarching relevance to social sciences and natural resources. JORT is international in scope and attracts scholars from all reaches of the world to facilitate the exchange of ideas. As such, the journal enhances understanding of scientific knowledge, empirical results, and practitioners'' needs. Therefore in JORT each article is accompanied by an executive summary, written by the editors or authors, highlighting the planning and management relevant aspects of the article.
期刊最新文献
Walking on sunshine: Application of a choice experiment to understand impacts of climate change on tourism attractions Towards a digital ranger: Using data from outdoor platforms to detect rule violations in protected areas and improve visitor management The influence of trekkers’ personal and subjective norms on their pro-environmental behaviors Environmental and social impacts of shifting park-use patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic: Insights from state and local park managers Usage and motives of urban river corridor: A case study at Hutuo River in Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1