环境对生活质量概念的概念化、测量和应用的影响

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities Pub Date : 2024-05-17 DOI:10.1111/jppi.12508
Marco Lombardi, Claudia Claes, Valerie J. Bradley, Robert L. Schalock
{"title":"环境对生活质量概念的概念化、测量和应用的影响","authors":"Marco Lombardi,&nbsp;Claudia Claes,&nbsp;Valerie J. Bradley,&nbsp;Robert L. Schalock","doi":"10.1111/jppi.12508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The influence of context on the conceptualization, measurement, and application of the quality of life concept was acknowledged in the principles contained within the original <i>Quality of Life Consensus Document</i> published in 2002 and validated in 2004. Since that time, there has been a substantial increase in our understanding of both the QOL construct and the multidimensional properties of context. The purpose of this article is to report on a multi-step process conducted in 2019 by a group of international quality of life experts to review, critique, and update where necessary the QOL principles that were originally developed in 2002. Updated principles for conceptualization, measurement, and application are provided. An understanding of the role of context on the QOL concept allows for measurement guidelines to accompany the measurement principles, an understanding of the application conditions associated with a person- or family-centered approach to QOL, and implementing guidelines regarding both the development of QOL-related policies and practices and their monitoring and evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of context on the conceptualization, measurement, and application of the concept of quality of life\",\"authors\":\"Marco Lombardi,&nbsp;Claudia Claes,&nbsp;Valerie J. Bradley,&nbsp;Robert L. Schalock\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jppi.12508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The influence of context on the conceptualization, measurement, and application of the quality of life concept was acknowledged in the principles contained within the original <i>Quality of Life Consensus Document</i> published in 2002 and validated in 2004. Since that time, there has been a substantial increase in our understanding of both the QOL construct and the multidimensional properties of context. The purpose of this article is to report on a multi-step process conducted in 2019 by a group of international quality of life experts to review, critique, and update where necessary the QOL principles that were originally developed in 2002. Updated principles for conceptualization, measurement, and application are provided. An understanding of the role of context on the QOL concept allows for measurement guidelines to accompany the measurement principles, an understanding of the application conditions associated with a person- or family-centered approach to QOL, and implementing guidelines regarding both the development of QOL-related policies and practices and their monitoring and evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jppi.12508\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jppi.12508","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2002 年出版的《生活质量共识文件》原文中的原则承认了情境对生活质量概念的概念化、测量和应用的影响,并于 2004 年进行了验证。从那时起,我们对生活质量概念和情境的多维特性的理解都有了很大的提高。本文旨在报告一组国际生活质量专家于 2019 年开展的多步骤工作,对最初于 2002 年制定的 QOL 原则进行回顾、批判和必要的更新。文章提供了概念化、测量和应用的最新原则。由于了解了环境对 QOL 概念的作用,因此在制定衡量原则时可以同时制定衡量准则,了解与以人为本或以家庭为中心的 QOL 方法相关的应用条件,以及与 QOL 相关的政策和实践的制定及其监测和评估的实施准则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The influence of context on the conceptualization, measurement, and application of the concept of quality of life

The influence of context on the conceptualization, measurement, and application of the quality of life concept was acknowledged in the principles contained within the original Quality of Life Consensus Document published in 2002 and validated in 2004. Since that time, there has been a substantial increase in our understanding of both the QOL construct and the multidimensional properties of context. The purpose of this article is to report on a multi-step process conducted in 2019 by a group of international quality of life experts to review, critique, and update where necessary the QOL principles that were originally developed in 2002. Updated principles for conceptualization, measurement, and application are provided. An understanding of the role of context on the QOL concept allows for measurement guidelines to accompany the measurement principles, an understanding of the application conditions associated with a person- or family-centered approach to QOL, and implementing guidelines regarding both the development of QOL-related policies and practices and their monitoring and evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Remote consultation: The experiences of community intellectual disability teams Advances and gaps in policy, practice, and research in transition for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities across four countries “It does change the narrative for health and social care” views of clinical and homeless service staff about the use of intellectual disability screening tools within homeless support pathways in the north of England Transitional challenges: Psychotropic medication and residential setting among young adults with intellectual disabilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1