OphthalMimic:用于评估眼科局部用药产品的不含动物组织的新型替代仪器。

IF 4.2 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Methods Pub Date : 2024-05-16 DOI:10.1016/j.ymeth.2024.05.005
Geisa N. Barbalho , Manuel A. Falcão , Venâncio Alves Amaral , Jonad L.A. Contarato , Aliucha M. Barbalho , Gabriela Kaori Diógenes , Melyssa Mariana Gomes Silva , Beatriz Carvalho de Barros do Vale Rochelle , Guilherme M. Gelfuso , Marcilio Cunha-Filho , Tais Gratieri
{"title":"OphthalMimic:用于评估眼科局部用药产品的不含动物组织的新型替代仪器。","authors":"Geisa N. Barbalho ,&nbsp;Manuel A. Falcão ,&nbsp;Venâncio Alves Amaral ,&nbsp;Jonad L.A. Contarato ,&nbsp;Aliucha M. Barbalho ,&nbsp;Gabriela Kaori Diógenes ,&nbsp;Melyssa Mariana Gomes Silva ,&nbsp;Beatriz Carvalho de Barros do Vale Rochelle ,&nbsp;Guilherme M. Gelfuso ,&nbsp;Marcilio Cunha-Filho ,&nbsp;Tais Gratieri","doi":"10.1016/j.ymeth.2024.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The necessity of animal-free performance tests for novel ophthalmic formulation screening is challenging. For this, we developed and validated a new device to simulate the dynamics and physical–chemical barriers of the eye for in vitro performance tests of topic ophthalmic formulations. The OphthalMimic is a 3D-printed device with an artificial lacrimal flow, a cul-de-sac area, a support base, and a simulated cornea comprised of a polymeric membrane containing poly-vinyl alcohol 10 % (w/v), gelatin 2.5 % (w/v), and different proportions of mucin and poloxamer, i.e., 1:1 (M1), 1:2 (M2), and 2:1 (M3) w/v, respectively. The support base is designed to move between 0° and 50° to replicate the movement of an eyelid. We challenged the model by testing the residence performance of poloxamer®407 16 % and poloxamer®407 16 % + chitosan 1 % (PLX16CS10) gels containing fluconazole. The test was conducted with a simulated tear flow of 1.0 mL.min<sup>−1</sup> for 5 min. The OphthalMimic successfully distinguished PLX16 and PLX16C10 formulations based on their fluconazole drainage (M1: 65 ± 14 % and 27 ± 10 %; M2: 58 ± 6 % and 38 ± 9 %; M3: 56 ± 5 % and 38 ± 18 %). In conclusion, the OphthalMimic is a promising tool for comparing the animal-free performance of ophthalmic formulations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":390,"journal":{"name":"Methods","volume":"228 ","pages":"Pages 1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"OphthalMimic: A new alternative apparatus without animal tissue for the evaluation of topical ophthalmic drug products\",\"authors\":\"Geisa N. Barbalho ,&nbsp;Manuel A. Falcão ,&nbsp;Venâncio Alves Amaral ,&nbsp;Jonad L.A. Contarato ,&nbsp;Aliucha M. Barbalho ,&nbsp;Gabriela Kaori Diógenes ,&nbsp;Melyssa Mariana Gomes Silva ,&nbsp;Beatriz Carvalho de Barros do Vale Rochelle ,&nbsp;Guilherme M. Gelfuso ,&nbsp;Marcilio Cunha-Filho ,&nbsp;Tais Gratieri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ymeth.2024.05.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The necessity of animal-free performance tests for novel ophthalmic formulation screening is challenging. For this, we developed and validated a new device to simulate the dynamics and physical–chemical barriers of the eye for in vitro performance tests of topic ophthalmic formulations. The OphthalMimic is a 3D-printed device with an artificial lacrimal flow, a cul-de-sac area, a support base, and a simulated cornea comprised of a polymeric membrane containing poly-vinyl alcohol 10 % (w/v), gelatin 2.5 % (w/v), and different proportions of mucin and poloxamer, i.e., 1:1 (M1), 1:2 (M2), and 2:1 (M3) w/v, respectively. The support base is designed to move between 0° and 50° to replicate the movement of an eyelid. We challenged the model by testing the residence performance of poloxamer®407 16 % and poloxamer®407 16 % + chitosan 1 % (PLX16CS10) gels containing fluconazole. The test was conducted with a simulated tear flow of 1.0 mL.min<sup>−1</sup> for 5 min. The OphthalMimic successfully distinguished PLX16 and PLX16C10 formulations based on their fluconazole drainage (M1: 65 ± 14 % and 27 ± 10 %; M2: 58 ± 6 % and 38 ± 9 %; M3: 56 ± 5 % and 38 ± 18 %). In conclusion, the OphthalMimic is a promising tool for comparing the animal-free performance of ophthalmic formulations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Methods\",\"volume\":\"228 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1046202324001154\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1046202324001154","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新型眼科制剂筛选需要进行不含动物的性能测试,这具有挑战性。为此,我们开发并验证了一种新装置,用于模拟眼球的动态和物理化学屏障,以对新型眼科制剂进行体外性能测试。OphthalMimic 是一种三维打印设备,带有人工泪道、内眦区、支撑基座和模拟角膜,模拟角膜由聚乙烯醇 10%(w/v)、明胶 2.5%(w/v)以及不同比例的粘蛋白和聚氧乙烯组成,即分别为 1:1 (M1)、1:2 (M2) 和 2:1 (M3)(w/v)。支撑底座可在 0° 和 50° 之间移动,以模拟眼睑的运动。我们通过测试含有氟康唑的 poloxamer®407 16 % 和 poloxamer®407 16 % + 壳聚糖 1 % (PLX16CS10) 凝胶的停留性能,对模型提出了挑战。测试以 1.0 mL.min-1 的模拟泪液流量进行,持续 5 分钟。OphthalMimic 根据 PLX16 和 PLX16C10 配方的氟康唑排水量成功区分了这两种配方(M1:65 ± 14 % 和 27 ± 10 %;M2:58 ± 6 % 和 38 ± 9 %;M3:56 ± 5 % 和 38 ± 18 %):56 ± 5 % 和 38 ± 18 %)。总之,OphthalMimic 是一种很有前途的工具,可用于比较眼科制剂的无动物性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
OphthalMimic: A new alternative apparatus without animal tissue for the evaluation of topical ophthalmic drug products

The necessity of animal-free performance tests for novel ophthalmic formulation screening is challenging. For this, we developed and validated a new device to simulate the dynamics and physical–chemical barriers of the eye for in vitro performance tests of topic ophthalmic formulations. The OphthalMimic is a 3D-printed device with an artificial lacrimal flow, a cul-de-sac area, a support base, and a simulated cornea comprised of a polymeric membrane containing poly-vinyl alcohol 10 % (w/v), gelatin 2.5 % (w/v), and different proportions of mucin and poloxamer, i.e., 1:1 (M1), 1:2 (M2), and 2:1 (M3) w/v, respectively. The support base is designed to move between 0° and 50° to replicate the movement of an eyelid. We challenged the model by testing the residence performance of poloxamer®407 16 % and poloxamer®407 16 % + chitosan 1 % (PLX16CS10) gels containing fluconazole. The test was conducted with a simulated tear flow of 1.0 mL.min−1 for 5 min. The OphthalMimic successfully distinguished PLX16 and PLX16C10 formulations based on their fluconazole drainage (M1: 65 ± 14 % and 27 ± 10 %; M2: 58 ± 6 % and 38 ± 9 %; M3: 56 ± 5 % and 38 ± 18 %). In conclusion, the OphthalMimic is a promising tool for comparing the animal-free performance of ophthalmic formulations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Methods
Methods 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
2.10%
发文量
222
审稿时长
11.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Methods focuses on rapidly developing techniques in the experimental biological and medical sciences. Each topical issue, organized by a guest editor who is an expert in the area covered, consists solely of invited quality articles by specialist authors, many of them reviews. Issues are devoted to specific technical approaches with emphasis on clear detailed descriptions of protocols that allow them to be reproduced easily. The background information provided enables researchers to understand the principles underlying the methods; other helpful sections include comparisons of alternative methods giving the advantages and disadvantages of particular methods, guidance on avoiding potential pitfalls, and suggestions for troubleshooting.
期刊最新文献
Optimizing retinal Imaging: Evaluation of ultrasmall TiO2 Nanoparticle- fluorescein conjugates for improved Fundus fluorescein angiography. Ab-Amy 2.0: Predicting light chain amyloidogenic risk of therapeutic antibodies based on antibody language model. Data preprocessing methods for selective sweep detection using convolutional neural networks. SITP: A single cell bioinformatics analysis flow captures proteasome markers in the development of breast cancer Exploring drug-target interaction prediction on cold-start scenarios via meta-learning-based graph transformer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1