未进行活检的 PIRADS 5 病变的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:该队列真的有必要进行活检吗?

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Journal of endourology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1089/end.2024.0124
Shirin Razdan, Sneha Parekh, Emelia K Watts, Jainer Munoz, Jayesh Parmar, Nile M Khanfar, Christopher Woodhouse, Sanjay Razdan
{"title":"未进行活检的 PIRADS 5 病变的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:该队列真的有必要进行活检吗?","authors":"Shirin Razdan, Sneha Parekh, Emelia K Watts, Jainer Munoz, Jayesh Parmar, Nile M Khanfar, Christopher Woodhouse, Sanjay Razdan","doi":"10.1089/end.2024.0124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Conventionally, confirmation of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) (Gleason grade group ≥ 2) involves an initial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) followed by biopsy. Prostate biopsy incurs inherent risks of infection, bleeding, patient discomfort, and a 6-week delay before robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). We explored the feasibility of immediate RALP in men with PIRADS 5 lesions without preceding biopsy. <b><i>Methodology:</i></b> After obtaining institutional review board approval, a prospective analysis was conducted on 235 patients with PIRADS 5 lesions on mpMRI from December 2018 to February 2023. Patients were divided into 2 groups as follows: Group NoBiopsy (biopsy not done before RALP, cases, <i>n</i> = 118) and Group YesBiopsy (biopsy done before RALP, controls, <i>n</i> = 117). Baseline preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters were analyzed. Functional outcomes were monitored at 1, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months follow-up post-RALP. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS and STATA. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Ninety-five percent of cases and 87.17% controls had csPCa on final pathology post-RALP. Multivariable analysis did not find significant association between biopsy status and csPCa. Abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE), family history, preoperative PSA, and MRI lesion volume predicted csPCa. Significant differences were observed in console time (NoBiopsy vs. YesBiopsy, 60 ± 10 vs. 70 ± 9 minutes, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and estimated blood loss (80 ± 20 vs. 100 ± 30 mL, <i>p</i> < 0.01) between groups. At 6 months post-RALP, 96% of men in Group NoBiopsy were continent, compared with 88% of men in Group YesBiopsy (<i>p</i> < 0.04). All men in the study cohort were continent (0 pads) at 12 months post-RALP. Ninety-eight percent of cases and 92% of controls at 9 months and 12 months, respectively, were able to have penetrative sex with or without PDE-5 inhibitors post-RALP. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> RALP without antecedent prostate biopsy in men with PIRADS 5 lesions demonstrated substantial csPCa detection rates and superior functional outcomes, warranting further validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in PIRADS 5 Lesions Without Prior Biopsy: Is Biopsy Really Necessary in This Cohort?\",\"authors\":\"Shirin Razdan, Sneha Parekh, Emelia K Watts, Jainer Munoz, Jayesh Parmar, Nile M Khanfar, Christopher Woodhouse, Sanjay Razdan\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/end.2024.0124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Conventionally, confirmation of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) (Gleason grade group ≥ 2) involves an initial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) followed by biopsy. Prostate biopsy incurs inherent risks of infection, bleeding, patient discomfort, and a 6-week delay before robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). We explored the feasibility of immediate RALP in men with PIRADS 5 lesions without preceding biopsy. <b><i>Methodology:</i></b> After obtaining institutional review board approval, a prospective analysis was conducted on 235 patients with PIRADS 5 lesions on mpMRI from December 2018 to February 2023. Patients were divided into 2 groups as follows: Group NoBiopsy (biopsy not done before RALP, cases, <i>n</i> = 118) and Group YesBiopsy (biopsy done before RALP, controls, <i>n</i> = 117). Baseline preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters were analyzed. Functional outcomes were monitored at 1, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months follow-up post-RALP. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS and STATA. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Ninety-five percent of cases and 87.17% controls had csPCa on final pathology post-RALP. Multivariable analysis did not find significant association between biopsy status and csPCa. Abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE), family history, preoperative PSA, and MRI lesion volume predicted csPCa. Significant differences were observed in console time (NoBiopsy vs. YesBiopsy, 60 ± 10 vs. 70 ± 9 minutes, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and estimated blood loss (80 ± 20 vs. 100 ± 30 mL, <i>p</i> < 0.01) between groups. At 6 months post-RALP, 96% of men in Group NoBiopsy were continent, compared with 88% of men in Group YesBiopsy (<i>p</i> < 0.04). All men in the study cohort were continent (0 pads) at 12 months post-RALP. Ninety-eight percent of cases and 92% of controls at 9 months and 12 months, respectively, were able to have penetrative sex with or without PDE-5 inhibitors post-RALP. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> RALP without antecedent prostate biopsy in men with PIRADS 5 lesions demonstrated substantial csPCa detection rates and superior functional outcomes, warranting further validation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of endourology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of endourology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0124\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0124","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:传统上,确诊有临床意义的前列腺癌(csPCa)(格里森分级 >/= 2 级)需要先进行多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI),然后再进行活检。前列腺活检存在感染、出血、患者不适等固有风险,并需要延迟 6 周才能进行机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术(RALP)。我们探讨了在未进行活组织检查的情况下对 PIRADS 5 病变男性立即实施 RALP 的可行性:在获得机构审查委员会批准后,从 2018 年 12 月至 2023 年 2 月对 235 名 mpMRI 上显示为 PIRADS 5 的患者进行了前瞻性分析。患者被分为 2 组:NoBiopsy组(RALP前未进行活检,病例,n=118)和YesBiopsy组(RALP前进行活检,对照组,n=117)。对术前、术中和术后的基线参数进行了分析。在 RALP 术后 1、3、6、9 和 12 个月的随访中监测功能结果。统计分析采用 SPSS 和 STATA:结果:RALP 术后最终病理结果显示,95% 的病例和 87.17% 的对照组患有 csPCa。多变量分析未发现活检状态与 csPCa 之间存在显著关联。异常数字直肠检查(DRE)、家族史、术前 PSA 和 MRI 病灶体积可预测 csPCa。在控制台时间(NoBiopsy 对 YesBiopsy,60±10 分钟对 70±9 分钟,p < 0.001)和估计失血量(80±20 毫升对 100±30 毫升,p < 0.01)方面,观察到组间存在显著差异。在RALP术后6个月,NoBiopsy组96%的男性与外界隔绝,而YesBiopsy组88%的男性与外界隔绝(p < 0.04)。在 RALP 术后 12 个月时,研究队列中的所有男性都大便失禁(0 便垫)。在RALP术后9个月和12个月时,分别有98%的病例和92%的对照组在使用或不使用PDE-5抑制剂的情况下能够进行插入式性交:结论:对患有 PIRADS 5 病变的男性进行 RALP 而不进行前列腺活检,可大大提高 csPCa 的检出率,并获得更好的功能性结果,值得进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in PIRADS 5 Lesions Without Prior Biopsy: Is Biopsy Really Necessary in This Cohort?

Introduction: Conventionally, confirmation of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) (Gleason grade group ≥ 2) involves an initial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) followed by biopsy. Prostate biopsy incurs inherent risks of infection, bleeding, patient discomfort, and a 6-week delay before robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). We explored the feasibility of immediate RALP in men with PIRADS 5 lesions without preceding biopsy. Methodology: After obtaining institutional review board approval, a prospective analysis was conducted on 235 patients with PIRADS 5 lesions on mpMRI from December 2018 to February 2023. Patients were divided into 2 groups as follows: Group NoBiopsy (biopsy not done before RALP, cases, n = 118) and Group YesBiopsy (biopsy done before RALP, controls, n = 117). Baseline preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters were analyzed. Functional outcomes were monitored at 1, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months follow-up post-RALP. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS and STATA. Results: Ninety-five percent of cases and 87.17% controls had csPCa on final pathology post-RALP. Multivariable analysis did not find significant association between biopsy status and csPCa. Abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE), family history, preoperative PSA, and MRI lesion volume predicted csPCa. Significant differences were observed in console time (NoBiopsy vs. YesBiopsy, 60 ± 10 vs. 70 ± 9 minutes, p < 0.001) and estimated blood loss (80 ± 20 vs. 100 ± 30 mL, p < 0.01) between groups. At 6 months post-RALP, 96% of men in Group NoBiopsy were continent, compared with 88% of men in Group YesBiopsy (p < 0.04). All men in the study cohort were continent (0 pads) at 12 months post-RALP. Ninety-eight percent of cases and 92% of controls at 9 months and 12 months, respectively, were able to have penetrative sex with or without PDE-5 inhibitors post-RALP. Conclusion: RALP without antecedent prostate biopsy in men with PIRADS 5 lesions demonstrated substantial csPCa detection rates and superior functional outcomes, warranting further validation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Analysis of Safety and Efficacy Between Anterior and Posterior Calyceal Entry in Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Does Incision Location Matter? Analysis of Single-Port Cosmesis in Urologic Reconstructive Surgery. Bio of Pankaj N Maheshwari, MS, DNB, MCh, FRCS. Digital Flexible Ureteroscope: Evaluating Factors Responsible for Damage and Implementing a Mandatory Certification Program for Usage. Impact of Residual Stone Fragments on Risk of Unplanned Stone Events Following Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1