Shiuan-Hui Wang, Lih-Jyh Fuh, Michael Y C Chen, Ming-Tzu Tsai, Heng-Li Huang, Shin-Lei Peng, Jui-Ting Hsu
{"title":"牙科植入术前骨密度评估:三种不同 ROI 方法的比较研究。","authors":"Shiuan-Hui Wang, Lih-Jyh Fuh, Michael Y C Chen, Ming-Tzu Tsai, Heng-Li Huang, Shin-Lei Peng, Jui-Ting Hsu","doi":"10.1186/s13005-024-00434-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dental cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is commonly used to evaluate cancellous bone density before dental implant surgery. However, to our knowledge, no measurement approach has been standardized yet. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between three different regions of interest (ROI) methods on cancellous bone density at the dental implant site using dental CBCT images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients' dental CBCT images (n = 300) obtained before dental implant surgery were processed using Mimics (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). At the potential implant sites, the rectangle, cylinder, and surrounding cylinder ROI methods were used to measure bone density. Repeated measures one-way analysis of variance was performed to compare the three ROI methods in terms of measurement results. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to identify the likely pair-wise correlations between the three ROI methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The density value obtained using the surrounding cylinder approach (grayscale value [GV],523.56 ± 228.03) was significantly higher than the values obtained using the rectangle (GV, 497.04 ± 236.69) and cylinder (GV,493 ± 231.19) ROI methods in terms of results. Furthermore, significant correlations were noted between the ROI methods (r > 0.965; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The density measured using the surrounding cylinder method was the highest. The choice of method may not influence the trends of measurement results.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of China Medical University Hospital, No. CMUH111-REC3-205. Informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board of China Medical University Hospital, CMUH111-REC3-205, owing to the retrospective nature of the study.</p>","PeriodicalId":12994,"journal":{"name":"Head & Face Medicine","volume":"20 1","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11100211/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative assessment of bone density for dental implantation: a comparative study of three different ROI methods.\",\"authors\":\"Shiuan-Hui Wang, Lih-Jyh Fuh, Michael Y C Chen, Ming-Tzu Tsai, Heng-Li Huang, Shin-Lei Peng, Jui-Ting Hsu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13005-024-00434-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dental cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is commonly used to evaluate cancellous bone density before dental implant surgery. However, to our knowledge, no measurement approach has been standardized yet. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between three different regions of interest (ROI) methods on cancellous bone density at the dental implant site using dental CBCT images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients' dental CBCT images (n = 300) obtained before dental implant surgery were processed using Mimics (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). At the potential implant sites, the rectangle, cylinder, and surrounding cylinder ROI methods were used to measure bone density. Repeated measures one-way analysis of variance was performed to compare the three ROI methods in terms of measurement results. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to identify the likely pair-wise correlations between the three ROI methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The density value obtained using the surrounding cylinder approach (grayscale value [GV],523.56 ± 228.03) was significantly higher than the values obtained using the rectangle (GV, 497.04 ± 236.69) and cylinder (GV,493 ± 231.19) ROI methods in terms of results. Furthermore, significant correlations were noted between the ROI methods (r > 0.965; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The density measured using the surrounding cylinder method was the highest. The choice of method may not influence the trends of measurement results.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of China Medical University Hospital, No. CMUH111-REC3-205. Informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board of China Medical University Hospital, CMUH111-REC3-205, owing to the retrospective nature of the study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Head & Face Medicine\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11100211/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Head & Face Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-024-00434-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head & Face Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-024-00434-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:牙科锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)通常用于在牙科种植手术前评估松质骨密度。然而,据我们所知,目前还没有标准化的测量方法。本研究旨在利用牙科锥形束计算机断层扫描图像,评估三种不同兴趣区(ROI)方法与牙科植入部位松质骨密度之间的关系:方法:使用 Mimics(比利时鲁汶的 Materialise 公司)处理患者在牙科种植手术前获得的牙科 CBCT 图像(n = 300)。在可能的种植部位,使用矩形、圆柱和周围圆柱 ROI 方法测量骨密度。对三种 ROI 方法的测量结果进行了重复测量单因素方差分析比较。为了确定三种 ROI 方法之间可能存在的成对相关性,还进行了皮尔逊相关分析:结果:使用环绕圆柱体方法获得的密度值(灰度值 [GV],523.56 ± 228.03)明显高于使用矩形(GV,497.04 ± 236.69)和圆柱体(GV,493 ± 231.19)ROI 方法获得的值。此外,ROI 方法之间还存在明显的相关性(r > 0.965;p 结论):使用环绕圆柱体方法测得的密度最高。方法的选择可能不会影响测量结果的趋势:本研究已获中国医科大学附属医院机构审查委员会批准,批准号:CMUH111-REC3-205。由于本研究为回顾性研究,中国医科大学附属医院机构审查委员会(CMUH111-REC3-205)免除了知情同意。
Preoperative assessment of bone density for dental implantation: a comparative study of three different ROI methods.
Background: Dental cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is commonly used to evaluate cancellous bone density before dental implant surgery. However, to our knowledge, no measurement approach has been standardized yet. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between three different regions of interest (ROI) methods on cancellous bone density at the dental implant site using dental CBCT images.
Methods: Patients' dental CBCT images (n = 300) obtained before dental implant surgery were processed using Mimics (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium). At the potential implant sites, the rectangle, cylinder, and surrounding cylinder ROI methods were used to measure bone density. Repeated measures one-way analysis of variance was performed to compare the three ROI methods in terms of measurement results. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to identify the likely pair-wise correlations between the three ROI methods.
Results: The density value obtained using the surrounding cylinder approach (grayscale value [GV],523.56 ± 228.03) was significantly higher than the values obtained using the rectangle (GV, 497.04 ± 236.69) and cylinder (GV,493 ± 231.19) ROI methods in terms of results. Furthermore, significant correlations were noted between the ROI methods (r > 0.965; p < 0.001).
Conclusions: The density measured using the surrounding cylinder method was the highest. The choice of method may not influence the trends of measurement results.
Trial registration: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of China Medical University Hospital, No. CMUH111-REC3-205. Informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board of China Medical University Hospital, CMUH111-REC3-205, owing to the retrospective nature of the study.
期刊介绍:
Head & Face Medicine is a multidisciplinary open access journal that publishes basic and clinical research concerning all aspects of cranial, facial and oral conditions.
The journal covers all aspects of cranial, facial and oral diseases and their management. It has been designed as a multidisciplinary journal for clinicians and researchers involved in the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of diseases which affect the human head and face. The journal is wide-ranging, covering the development, aetiology, epidemiology and therapy of head and face diseases to the basic science that underlies these diseases. Management of head and face diseases includes all aspects of surgical and non-surgical treatments including psychopharmacological therapies.