不同针刺部位表皮疼痛阈值的差异。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of Anesthesia Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-18 DOI:10.1007/s00540-024-03346-0
Katsuhide Masui, Takashi Asai
{"title":"不同针刺部位表皮疼痛阈值的差异。","authors":"Katsuhide Masui, Takashi Asai","doi":"10.1007/s00540-024-03346-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Puncture of the skin by a needle, such as for peripheral nerve block or for intravenous or arterial catheter placement, may cause pain to the patient, so that analgesic method may be required to reduce pain caused by needle puncture. Nevertheless, there is little information as to which puncture sites are more painful than the other.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After obtaining an approval of the study by a research ethics committee and written informed consent from all the participants, we studied 30 volunteers to quantify pain threshold at 13 skin sites of the body, using an algometer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with pain threshold at the cubital fossa (which was regarded as the control value), the relative pain threshold was significantly lower (with clinically meaningful difference) at the lateral carpus (median (interquartile range): 0.66 (0.56-0.73)) and the medial carpus (0.80 (0.73-0.94)); and was significantly higher (with clinically meaningful difference) at the olecranon (2.08 (1.93-2.42)), the forehead (1.59 (1.46-1.74)), the upper shoulder (1.52 (1.38-1.79)), and the dorsal shoulder (1.39 (1.18-1.55)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We conclude that there are significant differences in pain threshold between different puncture sites. Analgesic method before needle puncture may be required at the sites where the pain threshold is relatively low.</p>","PeriodicalId":14997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":"496-499"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in the epidermal pain threshold between different needle puncture sites.\",\"authors\":\"Katsuhide Masui, Takashi Asai\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00540-024-03346-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Puncture of the skin by a needle, such as for peripheral nerve block or for intravenous or arterial catheter placement, may cause pain to the patient, so that analgesic method may be required to reduce pain caused by needle puncture. Nevertheless, there is little information as to which puncture sites are more painful than the other.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After obtaining an approval of the study by a research ethics committee and written informed consent from all the participants, we studied 30 volunteers to quantify pain threshold at 13 skin sites of the body, using an algometer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with pain threshold at the cubital fossa (which was regarded as the control value), the relative pain threshold was significantly lower (with clinically meaningful difference) at the lateral carpus (median (interquartile range): 0.66 (0.56-0.73)) and the medial carpus (0.80 (0.73-0.94)); and was significantly higher (with clinically meaningful difference) at the olecranon (2.08 (1.93-2.42)), the forehead (1.59 (1.46-1.74)), the upper shoulder (1.52 (1.38-1.79)), and the dorsal shoulder (1.39 (1.18-1.55)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We conclude that there are significant differences in pain threshold between different puncture sites. Analgesic method before needle puncture may be required at the sites where the pain threshold is relatively low.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"496-499\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-024-03346-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-024-03346-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在进行周围神经阻滞或静脉或动脉导管置入时,针头刺入皮肤可能会给患者带来疼痛,因此可能需要使用镇痛方法来减轻针头刺入造成的疼痛。然而,关于哪个穿刺部位比其他穿刺部位更疼痛的信息却很少:方法:在获得研究伦理委员会的批准和所有参与者的书面知情同意后,我们对 30 名志愿者进行了研究,使用 Algometer 对身体 13 个皮肤部位的痛阈进行量化:结果:与肘窝处的痛阈值(作为对照值)相比,腕外侧的相对痛阈值明显较低(有临床意义的差异)(中位数(四分位间范围):0.66(0.56-0.05)):而在肩胛骨(2.08(1.93-2.42))、前额(1.59(1.46-1.74))、肩上部(1.52(1.38-1.79))和肩背(1.39(1.18-1.55))处,相对痛阈值明显较高(差异有临床意义):我们得出的结论是,不同穿刺部位的痛阈值存在明显差异。结论:我们得出结论,不同穿刺部位的疼痛阈值存在显著差异,在疼痛阈值相对较低的部位可能需要在穿刺前使用镇痛剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differences in the epidermal pain threshold between different needle puncture sites.

Purpose: Puncture of the skin by a needle, such as for peripheral nerve block or for intravenous or arterial catheter placement, may cause pain to the patient, so that analgesic method may be required to reduce pain caused by needle puncture. Nevertheless, there is little information as to which puncture sites are more painful than the other.

Methods: After obtaining an approval of the study by a research ethics committee and written informed consent from all the participants, we studied 30 volunteers to quantify pain threshold at 13 skin sites of the body, using an algometer.

Results: Compared with pain threshold at the cubital fossa (which was regarded as the control value), the relative pain threshold was significantly lower (with clinically meaningful difference) at the lateral carpus (median (interquartile range): 0.66 (0.56-0.73)) and the medial carpus (0.80 (0.73-0.94)); and was significantly higher (with clinically meaningful difference) at the olecranon (2.08 (1.93-2.42)), the forehead (1.59 (1.46-1.74)), the upper shoulder (1.52 (1.38-1.79)), and the dorsal shoulder (1.39 (1.18-1.55)).

Conclusions: We conclude that there are significant differences in pain threshold between different puncture sites. Analgesic method before needle puncture may be required at the sites where the pain threshold is relatively low.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Anesthesia
Journal of Anesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anesthesia is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists. This journal publishes original articles, review articles, special articles, clinical reports, short communications, letters to the editor, and book and multimedia reviews. The editors welcome the submission of manuscripts devoted to anesthesia and related topics from any country of the world. Membership in the Society is not a prerequisite. The Journal of Anesthesia (JA) welcomes case reports that show unique cases in perioperative medicine, intensive care, emergency medicine, and pain management.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Decrease of the peak heights of EEG bicoherence indicated insufficiency of analgesia during surgery under general anesthesia. Advantages of neuraxial anesthesia for cesarean delivery. McGRATH MAC size 1 vs. 2 blades: infant intubation time. Radial artery catheterization using a novel T-type ultrasound probe: a single-center randomized study. Vasopressors against post-spinal anesthesia hypotension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1