慢性阻塞性肺病恶化患者的抗生素治疗:系统回顾与荟萃分析。

IF 2.4 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Respiratory investigation Pub Date : 2024-05-17 DOI:10.1016/j.resinv.2024.05.007
Yasuhito Suzuki , Kento Sato , Suguru Sato , Sumito Inoue , Yoko Shibata
{"title":"慢性阻塞性肺病恶化患者的抗生素治疗:系统回顾与荟萃分析。","authors":"Yasuhito Suzuki ,&nbsp;Kento Sato ,&nbsp;Suguru Sato ,&nbsp;Sumito Inoue ,&nbsp;Yoko Shibata","doi":"10.1016/j.resinv.2024.05.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Although respiratory tract infection is a significant factor that triggers exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the benefit of antibiotics for patients with COPD exacerbation remains controversial. It is necessary to evaluate the efficacy and safety of antibiotics versus placebo in such patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of antibiotics versus placebo for the treatment of COPD exacerbation, and compared the frequencies of treatment failure, mortality, and adverse events between patients treated with antibiotics and those treated with placebo.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of six studies were included in this meta-analysis. The frequency of treatment failure was significantly lower in the antibiotic-treated patients compared to the placebo-treated patients (odds ratios [OR] 0.50, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.35–0.71, <em>p</em> = 0.0001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in mortality (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.05–3.76, <em>p</em> = 0.45) or frequency of adverse events (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.75–1.48, <em>p</em> = 0.78).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In the current systematic review and meta-analysis, we found that antibiotics were superior to placebo in patients with exacerbated COPD, as shown by the lower treatment failure rate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20934,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory investigation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antibiotic treatment for patients with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Yasuhito Suzuki ,&nbsp;Kento Sato ,&nbsp;Suguru Sato ,&nbsp;Sumito Inoue ,&nbsp;Yoko Shibata\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resinv.2024.05.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Although respiratory tract infection is a significant factor that triggers exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the benefit of antibiotics for patients with COPD exacerbation remains controversial. It is necessary to evaluate the efficacy and safety of antibiotics versus placebo in such patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of antibiotics versus placebo for the treatment of COPD exacerbation, and compared the frequencies of treatment failure, mortality, and adverse events between patients treated with antibiotics and those treated with placebo.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of six studies were included in this meta-analysis. The frequency of treatment failure was significantly lower in the antibiotic-treated patients compared to the placebo-treated patients (odds ratios [OR] 0.50, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.35–0.71, <em>p</em> = 0.0001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in mortality (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.05–3.76, <em>p</em> = 0.45) or frequency of adverse events (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.75–1.48, <em>p</em> = 0.78).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In the current systematic review and meta-analysis, we found that antibiotics were superior to placebo in patients with exacerbated COPD, as shown by the lower treatment failure rate.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory investigation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212534524000820\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory investigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212534524000820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管呼吸道感染是引发慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)病情加重的重要因素,但抗生素对慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重患者的益处仍存在争议。有必要评估抗生素与安慰剂对此类患者的疗效和安全性:我们对治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重的抗生素与安慰剂的随机对照试验进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,并比较了接受抗生素治疗和接受安慰剂治疗的患者的治疗失败、死亡率和不良事件发生率:本次荟萃分析共纳入了六项研究。与安慰剂治疗患者相比,抗生素治疗患者治疗失败的频率明显较低(几率比 [OR] 0.50,95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.35-0.71,P = 0.0001)。两组患者在死亡率(OR 0.44,95% CI 0.05-3.76,p = 0.45)或不良事件发生频率(OR 1.05,95% CI 0.75-1.48,p = 0.78)方面无明显差异:在当前的系统综述和荟萃分析中,我们发现抗生素对慢性阻塞性肺病恶化患者的治疗效果优于安慰剂,这体现在较低的治疗失败率上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antibiotic treatment for patients with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Although respiratory tract infection is a significant factor that triggers exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the benefit of antibiotics for patients with COPD exacerbation remains controversial. It is necessary to evaluate the efficacy and safety of antibiotics versus placebo in such patients.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of antibiotics versus placebo for the treatment of COPD exacerbation, and compared the frequencies of treatment failure, mortality, and adverse events between patients treated with antibiotics and those treated with placebo.

Results

A total of six studies were included in this meta-analysis. The frequency of treatment failure was significantly lower in the antibiotic-treated patients compared to the placebo-treated patients (odds ratios [OR] 0.50, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.35–0.71, p = 0.0001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in mortality (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.05–3.76, p = 0.45) or frequency of adverse events (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.75–1.48, p = 0.78).

Conclusion

In the current systematic review and meta-analysis, we found that antibiotics were superior to placebo in patients with exacerbated COPD, as shown by the lower treatment failure rate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory investigation
Respiratory investigation RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
114
审稿时长
64 days
期刊最新文献
Analysis of anticholinergic drugs associated with aspiration pneumonia using the Japanese adverse drug event report database: Supplementary insights from a scoping review Safety and immunogenicity of an mRNA-based RSV vaccine in Japanese older adults aged ≥60 years: A phase 1, randomized, observer-blind, placebo-controlled trial New diagnostic criteria and current issues for pulmonary hypertension Transesophageal ultrasound-guided bronchoscopic Acquire TBNB versus Vizishot2 TBNA needles for neoplastic lesions: A retrospective study Reevaluating diagnosis in interstitial lung disease with a second multidisciplinary discussion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1