良心的诉求:证明自己是抵抗者的责任

Michael Pakaluk, Catherine R. Pakaluk
{"title":"良心的诉求:证明自己是抵抗者的责任","authors":"Michael Pakaluk, Catherine R. Pakaluk","doi":"10.1177/00243639241251818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An important question that arises as regards a member in a gravely unjust system is whether by any act of “resistance,” undertaken at personal risk, he or she proved himself to be set against that system. This was the question posed by de-Nazification experts employed by the U.S. military in occupied Germany after World War II.1 A similar question is posed today by social movements, such as Black Lives Matter, reacting against historical racism in the United States. We argue that, today, those who in conscience, as members of a gravely unjust system, have wanted to reject vaccinations developed or tested using cell lines derived from abortion, should be understood and evaluated in the same way. We believe that such an approach provides perhaps the best hope for the re-invigoration of society through the pro-life ideals embodied in the “gospel of life.”","PeriodicalId":505854,"journal":{"name":"The Linacre Quarterly","volume":"68 47","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Claim of Conscience: The Duty to Prove Oneself a Resistor\",\"authors\":\"Michael Pakaluk, Catherine R. Pakaluk\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00243639241251818\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An important question that arises as regards a member in a gravely unjust system is whether by any act of “resistance,” undertaken at personal risk, he or she proved himself to be set against that system. This was the question posed by de-Nazification experts employed by the U.S. military in occupied Germany after World War II.1 A similar question is posed today by social movements, such as Black Lives Matter, reacting against historical racism in the United States. We argue that, today, those who in conscience, as members of a gravely unjust system, have wanted to reject vaccinations developed or tested using cell lines derived from abortion, should be understood and evaluated in the same way. We believe that such an approach provides perhaps the best hope for the re-invigoration of society through the pro-life ideals embodied in the “gospel of life.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":505854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Linacre Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"68 47\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Linacre Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00243639241251818\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Linacre Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00243639241251818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于处于严重不公正制度中的成员来说,一个重要的问题是,他或她是否通过冒着个人风险采取的任何 "抵抗 "行动证明了自己与该制度是对立的。这是第二次世界大战后美军在德国占领区聘用的去纳粹化专家提出的问题。1 今天,黑人的生命很重要(Black Lives Matter)等反对美国历史上种族主义的社会运动也提出了类似的问题。我们认为,今天,那些出于良知,作为严重不公正制度的成员,想要拒绝接受使用从堕胎中提取的细胞系开发或测试的疫苗的人,应该以同样的方式来理解和评价。我们认为,这种方法或许是通过 "生命的福音 "所体现的支持生命的理想来重振社会的最大希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Claim of Conscience: The Duty to Prove Oneself a Resistor
An important question that arises as regards a member in a gravely unjust system is whether by any act of “resistance,” undertaken at personal risk, he or she proved himself to be set against that system. This was the question posed by de-Nazification experts employed by the U.S. military in occupied Germany after World War II.1 A similar question is posed today by social movements, such as Black Lives Matter, reacting against historical racism in the United States. We argue that, today, those who in conscience, as members of a gravely unjust system, have wanted to reject vaccinations developed or tested using cell lines derived from abortion, should be understood and evaluated in the same way. We believe that such an approach provides perhaps the best hope for the re-invigoration of society through the pro-life ideals embodied in the “gospel of life.”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Positive and Negative Rights of Conscience: Balancing When Rights Conflict Book Review: Ethics Lost in Modernity: Reflections on Wittgenstein and Bioethics by Matthew S Vest Validation of Ethical COVID-19 Antibody Testing that Adheres to Pro-Life Principles A Claim of Conscience: The Duty to Prove Oneself a Resistor An Evaluation of Controversial Statements in Etica Teologica Della Vita
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1