利用混合数据建立相对于海面的海底模型的可能性和质量评估

IF 2.1 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY Transactions in GIS Pub Date : 2024-05-13 DOI:10.1111/tgis.13178
Idzikowska Magdalena, Pająk Katarzyna, Kowalczyk Kamil
{"title":"利用混合数据建立相对于海面的海底模型的可能性和质量评估","authors":"Idzikowska Magdalena, Pająk Katarzyna, Kowalczyk Kamil","doi":"10.1111/tgis.13178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of reliable seafloor topography models is a complex, multi‐track process, which is due to the diversity of available sets of data, their resolution, acquisition methods, complex seafloor forms, and the multitude of interpolation techniques. This article is aimed at assessing the suitability of different algorithms for seafloor modelling based on hybrid datasets (multi‐beam soundings and raster GEBCO models). The study involves the selection of optimum solutions as well as a comparative analysis of sea level change trends based on altimetric data. The study area relates to four forms of seafloor topography, namely the oceanic trench, the submarine canyon, the seamount region, and the undulating areas. The most reliable models were built by interpolating by the Kriging methods at a 0.01‐degree grid spacing. The smallest residues and the greatest correlation are found between models generated from all available sounding datasets. Raster GEBCO models can be an alternative in the additional model densification. The results show the following relationships: the greater the variation in the topography, the greater the divergence in the values of the sea level change trends. As for seamounts, hills, and folds, when the terrain rises rapidly, the trend values also increase and then decrease during the decline. Seafloor structure mapping enables the search for relationships between the seafloor topography and the changes occurring at the water surface.","PeriodicalId":47842,"journal":{"name":"Transactions in GIS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Possibility and quality assessment in seafloor modeling relative to the sea surface using hybrid data\",\"authors\":\"Idzikowska Magdalena, Pająk Katarzyna, Kowalczyk Kamil\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tgis.13178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The development of reliable seafloor topography models is a complex, multi‐track process, which is due to the diversity of available sets of data, their resolution, acquisition methods, complex seafloor forms, and the multitude of interpolation techniques. This article is aimed at assessing the suitability of different algorithms for seafloor modelling based on hybrid datasets (multi‐beam soundings and raster GEBCO models). The study involves the selection of optimum solutions as well as a comparative analysis of sea level change trends based on altimetric data. The study area relates to four forms of seafloor topography, namely the oceanic trench, the submarine canyon, the seamount region, and the undulating areas. The most reliable models were built by interpolating by the Kriging methods at a 0.01‐degree grid spacing. The smallest residues and the greatest correlation are found between models generated from all available sounding datasets. Raster GEBCO models can be an alternative in the additional model densification. The results show the following relationships: the greater the variation in the topography, the greater the divergence in the values of the sea level change trends. As for seamounts, hills, and folds, when the terrain rises rapidly, the trend values also increase and then decrease during the decline. Seafloor structure mapping enables the search for relationships between the seafloor topography and the changes occurring at the water surface.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions in GIS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions in GIS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.13178\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions in GIS","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.13178","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

开发可靠的海底地形模型是一个复杂的多轨过程,其原因在于可用数据集、数据分 辨率、采集方法、复杂的海底形态以及多种插值技术的多样性。本文旨在评估基于混合数据集(多波束探测数据和光栅 GEBCO 模型)的不同海底建模算法的适用性。研究包括选择最佳解决方案,以及对基于测高数据的海平面变化趋势进行比较分析。研究区域涉及四种形式的海底地形,即大洋海沟、海底峡谷、海山区域和起伏区域。通过克里格法以 0.01 度的网格间距进行插值,建立了最可靠的模型。所有可用探空数据集生成的模型之间的残差最小,相关性最大。栅格 GEBCO 模型可以作为额外模型密集化的一种替代方法。结果显示了以下关系:地形变化越大,海平面变化趋势值的差异就越大。至于海山、丘陵和褶皱,当地形快速上升时,趋势值也会增加,然后在下降过程中减少。绘制海底结构图可以寻找海底地形与水面变化之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Possibility and quality assessment in seafloor modeling relative to the sea surface using hybrid data
The development of reliable seafloor topography models is a complex, multi‐track process, which is due to the diversity of available sets of data, their resolution, acquisition methods, complex seafloor forms, and the multitude of interpolation techniques. This article is aimed at assessing the suitability of different algorithms for seafloor modelling based on hybrid datasets (multi‐beam soundings and raster GEBCO models). The study involves the selection of optimum solutions as well as a comparative analysis of sea level change trends based on altimetric data. The study area relates to four forms of seafloor topography, namely the oceanic trench, the submarine canyon, the seamount region, and the undulating areas. The most reliable models were built by interpolating by the Kriging methods at a 0.01‐degree grid spacing. The smallest residues and the greatest correlation are found between models generated from all available sounding datasets. Raster GEBCO models can be an alternative in the additional model densification. The results show the following relationships: the greater the variation in the topography, the greater the divergence in the values of the sea level change trends. As for seamounts, hills, and folds, when the terrain rises rapidly, the trend values also increase and then decrease during the decline. Seafloor structure mapping enables the search for relationships between the seafloor topography and the changes occurring at the water surface.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transactions in GIS
Transactions in GIS GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: Transactions in GIS is an international journal which provides a forum for high quality, original research articles, review articles, short notes and book reviews that focus on: - practical and theoretical issues influencing the development of GIS - the collection, analysis, modelling, interpretation and display of spatial data within GIS - the connections between GIS and related technologies - new GIS applications which help to solve problems affecting the natural or built environments, or business
期刊最新文献
Knowledge‐Guided Automated Cartographic Generalization Process Construction: A Case Study Based on Map Analysis of Public Maps of China City Influence Network: Mining and Analyzing the Influence of Chinese Cities Based on Social Media PyGRF: An Improved Python Geographical Random Forest Model and Case Studies in Public Health and Natural Disasters Neural Sensing: Toward a New Approach to Understanding Emotional Responses to Place Construction of Earth Observation Knowledge Hub Based on Knowledge Graph
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1