基于放射组学的颅内动脉瘤风险评估预测提名图

Sricharan S. Veeturi, Arshaq Saleem, Diego Ojeda, Elena Sagues, Sebastian Sanchez, Andres S Gudino, E. Levy, David Hasan, Adnan H Siddiqui, V. Tutino, Edgar A Samaniego
{"title":"基于放射组学的颅内动脉瘤风险评估预测提名图","authors":"Sricharan S. Veeturi, Arshaq Saleem, Diego Ojeda, Elena Sagues, Sebastian Sanchez, Andres S Gudino, E. Levy, David Hasan, Adnan H Siddiqui, V. Tutino, Edgar A Samaniego","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4350156/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Aneurysm wall enhancement (AWE) has the potential to be used as an imaging biomarker for the risk stratification of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). Radiomics provides a refined approach to quantify and further characterize AWE's textural features. This study examines the performance of AWE quantification combined with clinical information in detecting symptomatic IAs. Methods: Ninety patients harboring 104 IAs (29 symptomatic and 75 asymptomatic) underwent high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HR-MRI). The assessment of AWE was performed using two different methods: 3D-AWE mapping and composite radiomics-based score (RadScore). The dataset was split into training and testing subsets. The testing set was used to build two different nomograms using each modality of AWE assessment combined with patients’ demographic information and aneurysm morphological data. Finally, each nomogram was evaluated on an independent testing set. Results: A total of 22 radiomic features were significantly different between symptomatic and asymptomatic IAs. The 3D-AWE Mapping nomogram achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.77 (63% accuracy, 78% sensitivity and 58% specificity). The RadScore nomogram exhibited a better performance, achieving an AUC of 0.83 (77% accuracy, 89% sensitivity and 73% specificity). Conclusions : Combining AWE quantification through radiomic analysis with patient demographic data in a clinical nomogram achieved high accuracy in detecting symptomatic IAs.","PeriodicalId":21039,"journal":{"name":"Research Square","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiomics-Based Predictive Nomogram for Assessing the Risk of Intracranial Aneurysms\",\"authors\":\"Sricharan S. Veeturi, Arshaq Saleem, Diego Ojeda, Elena Sagues, Sebastian Sanchez, Andres S Gudino, E. Levy, David Hasan, Adnan H Siddiqui, V. Tutino, Edgar A Samaniego\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/rs.3.rs-4350156/v1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background: Aneurysm wall enhancement (AWE) has the potential to be used as an imaging biomarker for the risk stratification of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). Radiomics provides a refined approach to quantify and further characterize AWE's textural features. This study examines the performance of AWE quantification combined with clinical information in detecting symptomatic IAs. Methods: Ninety patients harboring 104 IAs (29 symptomatic and 75 asymptomatic) underwent high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HR-MRI). The assessment of AWE was performed using two different methods: 3D-AWE mapping and composite radiomics-based score (RadScore). The dataset was split into training and testing subsets. The testing set was used to build two different nomograms using each modality of AWE assessment combined with patients’ demographic information and aneurysm morphological data. Finally, each nomogram was evaluated on an independent testing set. Results: A total of 22 radiomic features were significantly different between symptomatic and asymptomatic IAs. The 3D-AWE Mapping nomogram achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.77 (63% accuracy, 78% sensitivity and 58% specificity). The RadScore nomogram exhibited a better performance, achieving an AUC of 0.83 (77% accuracy, 89% sensitivity and 73% specificity). Conclusions : Combining AWE quantification through radiomic analysis with patient demographic data in a clinical nomogram achieved high accuracy in detecting symptomatic IAs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Square\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Square\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4350156/v1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Square","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4350156/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 背景:动脉瘤壁强化(AWE)有可能被用作颅内动脉瘤(IAs)风险分层的成像生物标志物。放射组学提供了一种精细的方法来量化和进一步描述 AWE 的纹理特征。本研究探讨了 AWE 定量与临床信息相结合在检测无症状 IAs 方面的性能。方法:携带 104 个 IAs 的 90 位患者(29 位有症状,75 位无症状)接受了高分辨率磁共振成像(HR-MRI)检查。AWE 评估采用两种不同的方法:3D-AWE 绘图和基于放射组学的综合评分(RadScore)。数据集分为训练子集和测试子集。测试集用于使用每种 AWE 评估方法结合患者的人口统计学信息和动脉瘤形态学数据建立两种不同的提名图。最后,在独立的测试集上对每个提名图进行评估。结果有症状和无症状动脉瘤之间共有22个放射学特征存在显著差异。3D-AWE Mapping提名图的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.77(准确率63%,灵敏度78%,特异性58%)。RadScore 提名图的表现更好,AUC 为 0.83(准确率为 77%,灵敏度为 89%,特异性为 73%)。结论 :在临床提名图中,通过放射学分析将 AWE 定量与患者人口统计学数据相结合,在检测有症状的 IA 方面达到了很高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Radiomics-Based Predictive Nomogram for Assessing the Risk of Intracranial Aneurysms
Abstract Background: Aneurysm wall enhancement (AWE) has the potential to be used as an imaging biomarker for the risk stratification of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). Radiomics provides a refined approach to quantify and further characterize AWE's textural features. This study examines the performance of AWE quantification combined with clinical information in detecting symptomatic IAs. Methods: Ninety patients harboring 104 IAs (29 symptomatic and 75 asymptomatic) underwent high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HR-MRI). The assessment of AWE was performed using two different methods: 3D-AWE mapping and composite radiomics-based score (RadScore). The dataset was split into training and testing subsets. The testing set was used to build two different nomograms using each modality of AWE assessment combined with patients’ demographic information and aneurysm morphological data. Finally, each nomogram was evaluated on an independent testing set. Results: A total of 22 radiomic features were significantly different between symptomatic and asymptomatic IAs. The 3D-AWE Mapping nomogram achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.77 (63% accuracy, 78% sensitivity and 58% specificity). The RadScore nomogram exhibited a better performance, achieving an AUC of 0.83 (77% accuracy, 89% sensitivity and 73% specificity). Conclusions : Combining AWE quantification through radiomic analysis with patient demographic data in a clinical nomogram achieved high accuracy in detecting symptomatic IAs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Structure of METTL3-METTL14 with an m6A nucleotide reveals insights into m6A conversion and sensing. Combination of a MIP3α-antigen fusion therapeutic DNA vaccine with treatments of IFNα and 5-Aza-2'Deoxycytidine enhances activated effector CD8+ T cells expressing CD11c in the B16F10 melanoma model. Disparity in temporal and spatial relationships between resting-state electrophysiological and fMRI signals. Acute sympathetic activation blunts the hyperemic and vasodilatory response to passive leg movement Pharmacological PINK1 activation ameliorates Pathology in Parkinson’s Disease models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1