公司绩效衡量系统有效性的障碍分析:各层级的看法

IF 3.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL International Journal of Lean Six Sigma Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1108/ijlss-12-2023-0205
Flávio Cunha, J. Dinis-Carvalho, Rui M. Sousa
{"title":"公司绩效衡量系统有效性的障碍分析:各层级的看法","authors":"Flávio Cunha, J. Dinis-Carvalho, Rui M. Sousa","doi":"10.1108/ijlss-12-2023-0205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to identify the perception of people in a Portuguese company regarding the main barriers to the effectiveness of the existing performance measurement system (PMS) and whether those perceptions are dependent of people’s hierarchical levels, education levels, work shifts, gender and department.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nPrimary data was collected through structured interviews (adapted to three levels of interviewees in the company hierarchy) and Likert scale questionnaires. Descriptive statistical analysis of the collected data was performed as well as a chi-square test.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results provide an insight on the perception of barriers to the PMS effectiveness in the company. After performing interviews and questionnaires it was possible to identify that the main perceived barriers were: poor communication system and issues on target definition, lack of trained resources, employee involvement, indicators understanding and use for improvement.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis study is the starting point to develop actions aiming to eliminate, or at least mitigate, the impact of the barriers on the PMS effectiveness.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nPMSs play an essential role in an organization, so it is essential to identify what hinders its effectiveness. This study opens the discussion by diagnosing the company’s perception of the barriers to PMS effectiveness.\n","PeriodicalId":48601,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Lean Six Sigma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of barriers for performance measurement system effectiveness in a company: perceptions across hierarchical levels\",\"authors\":\"Flávio Cunha, J. Dinis-Carvalho, Rui M. Sousa\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijlss-12-2023-0205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to identify the perception of people in a Portuguese company regarding the main barriers to the effectiveness of the existing performance measurement system (PMS) and whether those perceptions are dependent of people’s hierarchical levels, education levels, work shifts, gender and department.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nPrimary data was collected through structured interviews (adapted to three levels of interviewees in the company hierarchy) and Likert scale questionnaires. Descriptive statistical analysis of the collected data was performed as well as a chi-square test.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe results provide an insight on the perception of barriers to the PMS effectiveness in the company. After performing interviews and questionnaires it was possible to identify that the main perceived barriers were: poor communication system and issues on target definition, lack of trained resources, employee involvement, indicators understanding and use for improvement.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThis study is the starting point to develop actions aiming to eliminate, or at least mitigate, the impact of the barriers on the PMS effectiveness.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nPMSs play an essential role in an organization, so it is essential to identify what hinders its effectiveness. This study opens the discussion by diagnosing the company’s perception of the barriers to PMS effectiveness.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":48601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Lean Six Sigma\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Lean Six Sigma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlss-12-2023-0205\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Lean Six Sigma","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlss-12-2023-0205","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定葡萄牙一家公司的员工对影响现有绩效衡量系统(PMS)有效性的主要障碍的看法,以及这些看法是否与员工的层级、教育水平、工作班次、性别和部门有关。对收集到的数据进行了描述性统计分析和卡方检验。在进行访谈和问卷调查后,可以确定主要的认知障碍是:沟通系统不完善和目标定义问题、缺乏训练有素的资源、员工参与、指标理解和用于改进。本研究通过诊断公司对影响管理系统有效性的障碍的看法展开讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of barriers for performance measurement system effectiveness in a company: perceptions across hierarchical levels
Purpose This study aims to identify the perception of people in a Portuguese company regarding the main barriers to the effectiveness of the existing performance measurement system (PMS) and whether those perceptions are dependent of people’s hierarchical levels, education levels, work shifts, gender and department. Design/methodology/approach Primary data was collected through structured interviews (adapted to three levels of interviewees in the company hierarchy) and Likert scale questionnaires. Descriptive statistical analysis of the collected data was performed as well as a chi-square test. Findings The results provide an insight on the perception of barriers to the PMS effectiveness in the company. After performing interviews and questionnaires it was possible to identify that the main perceived barriers were: poor communication system and issues on target definition, lack of trained resources, employee involvement, indicators understanding and use for improvement. Practical implications This study is the starting point to develop actions aiming to eliminate, or at least mitigate, the impact of the barriers on the PMS effectiveness. Originality/value PMSs play an essential role in an organization, so it is essential to identify what hinders its effectiveness. This study opens the discussion by diagnosing the company’s perception of the barriers to PMS effectiveness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Lean Six Sigma
International Journal of Lean Six Sigma Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Launched in 2010, International Journal of Lean Six Sigma publishes original, empirical and review papers, case studies and theoretical frameworks or models related to Lean and Six Sigma methodologies. High quality submissions are sought from academics, researchers, practitioners and leading management consultants from around the world. Research, case studies and examples can be cited from manufacturing, service and public sectors. This includes manufacturing, health, financial services, local government, education, professional services, IT Services, transport, etc.
期刊最新文献
Overall lean and green effectiveness based on the environmentally sustainable value stream mapping adapted to agribusiness Quality improvement of magnetron in Company T based on Six Sigma Adapting and validating the EPLIT for assessing lean healthcare maturity in Brazilian hospitals Quality improvement development in Swedish healthcare and welfare services Adopting Industry 4.0 technologies through lean tools: evidence from the European Manufacturing Survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1