当欧盟机构成立咨询委员会时:一切为了自治?

Torbjørg Jevnaker
{"title":"当欧盟机构成立咨询委员会时:一切为了自治?","authors":"Torbjørg Jevnaker","doi":"10.1111/jcms.13618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"European Union (EU) agencies' relations with interest groups have received scarce research attention despite their relevance to bureaucratic autonomy and functioning. Such relations may be organised via advisory committees, which are durable organisational structures for regularised contact between an agency and those societal actors given membership by the agency. Advisory committees may be imposed by the legislator to control an agency or harnessed by the latter to build autonomy. The EU legislator leaves significant discretion to EU agencies regarding advisory committees. However, EU agencies' late emergence in already densely populated regulatory fields begs the question of whether the use of agency discretion is fully autonomous. A case in point is the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER), whose establishment and design of three European Stakeholder Committees are examined here. Advisory committees were needed by, but also imposed on, ACER, reflecting agency preferences to improve task performance as much as prior institutionalisation within the organisational field. Hence, factors beyond legal requirements can constrain agency discretion on how to organise the organisation of agency–interest group relations.","PeriodicalId":516279,"journal":{"name":"JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies","volume":" 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When EU Agencies Set Up Advisory Committees: All About Autonomy?\",\"authors\":\"Torbjørg Jevnaker\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jcms.13618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"European Union (EU) agencies' relations with interest groups have received scarce research attention despite their relevance to bureaucratic autonomy and functioning. Such relations may be organised via advisory committees, which are durable organisational structures for regularised contact between an agency and those societal actors given membership by the agency. Advisory committees may be imposed by the legislator to control an agency or harnessed by the latter to build autonomy. The EU legislator leaves significant discretion to EU agencies regarding advisory committees. However, EU agencies' late emergence in already densely populated regulatory fields begs the question of whether the use of agency discretion is fully autonomous. A case in point is the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER), whose establishment and design of three European Stakeholder Committees are examined here. Advisory committees were needed by, but also imposed on, ACER, reflecting agency preferences to improve task performance as much as prior institutionalisation within the organisational field. Hence, factors beyond legal requirements can constrain agency discretion on how to organise the organisation of agency–interest group relations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies\",\"volume\":\" 17\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13618\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧盟(EU)机构与利益集团的关系尽管与官僚机构的自主性和运作息息相关,但却很少受到研究关注。这种关系可以通过咨询委员会来组织,咨询委员会是一个机构与那些被该机构赋予成员资格的社会行动者之间定期接触的持久组织结构。咨询委员会可以由立法者强加以控制一个机构,也可以由后者利用以建立自主权。欧盟立法者在咨询委员会方面给欧盟机构留有很大的自由裁量权。然而,欧盟机构在人口已经十分密集的监管领域中出现较晚,这就提出了一个问题,即机构自由裁量权的使用是否完全自主。能源监管者合作机构(ACER)就是一个很好的例子,本文将对该机构建立和设计的三个欧洲利益相关者委员会进行研究。咨询委员会是 ACER 所需要的,但也是强加给 ACER 的,这反映了机构在改善任务绩效方面的偏好,以及在组织领域内的事先制度化。因此,在如何组织机构与利益集团的关系方面,法律要求之外的因素可能会限制机构的自由裁量权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
When EU Agencies Set Up Advisory Committees: All About Autonomy?
European Union (EU) agencies' relations with interest groups have received scarce research attention despite their relevance to bureaucratic autonomy and functioning. Such relations may be organised via advisory committees, which are durable organisational structures for regularised contact between an agency and those societal actors given membership by the agency. Advisory committees may be imposed by the legislator to control an agency or harnessed by the latter to build autonomy. The EU legislator leaves significant discretion to EU agencies regarding advisory committees. However, EU agencies' late emergence in already densely populated regulatory fields begs the question of whether the use of agency discretion is fully autonomous. A case in point is the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER), whose establishment and design of three European Stakeholder Committees are examined here. Advisory committees were needed by, but also imposed on, ACER, reflecting agency preferences to improve task performance as much as prior institutionalisation within the organisational field. Hence, factors beyond legal requirements can constrain agency discretion on how to organise the organisation of agency–interest group relations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Doing the Same With Different Results: Variations in EU Presidencies of Austria, Finland, Slovakia and Czechia Non‐learning Within a Constellation of Communities of Practice: The Case of the EU and Its Democracy Support in the Arab World Norm Contestation in EU Foreign Policy: The Case of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights When EU Agencies Set Up Advisory Committees: All About Autonomy? The Tools of External Migration Policy in the EU Member States: The Case of Italy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1