糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者 PCI 后 TIMI 流量的比较

A. Basit, Ashraf Abdul Qahir, Yusra, Sarfraz Ali Mangi, Muhammad Aslam, Vickee Kumar Mamtani
{"title":"糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者 PCI 后 TIMI 流量的比较","authors":"A. Basit, Ashraf Abdul Qahir, Yusra, Sarfraz Ali Mangi, Muhammad Aslam, Vickee Kumar Mamtani","doi":"10.61919/jhrr.v4i2.890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, with diabetes significantly exacerbating the incidence and severity of coronary artery disease. Diabetic patients experience altered coronary blood flow dynamics, which can impact the efficacy of therapeutic interventions like percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).\nObjective: This study aims to compare the post-PCI Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grades between diabetic and non-diabetic patients to assess the impact of diabetes on the short-term outcomes of coronary revascularization.\nMethods: A retrospective observational study was conducted at the National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases in Karachi, involving 3,000 patients who underwent primary PCI between January 2018 and December 2020. Patients were categorized into diabetic (1,500) and non-diabetic (1,500) groups. Data collected included demographics, coronary artery risk factors, TIMI flow grades before and after PCI, and the use of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25, employing chi-square tests, t-tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests for comparative analysis, with a p-value of <0.05 considered statistically significant.\nResults: The study found significant differences in postoperative TIMI3 flow rates, with non-diabetic patients achieving a higher rate of TIMI3 (59.4%) compared to diabetic patients (58.1%). The use of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors was higher in diabetic patients (34.7%) than in non-diabetic patients (1.8%). Additionally, diabetic patients showed a higher incidence of multi-vessel disease and more severe lesion profiles, including higher rates of triple branch lesions (45.9% vs. 39.9%) and left main lesions (53% vs. 43.9%).\nConclusion: Diabetic patients exhibit worse post-PCI TIMI flow grades and more complex coronary lesions compared to non-diabetic patients, suggesting that diabetes adversely affects the outcomes of coronary revascularization. These findings underscore the need for tailored therapeutic approaches to improve PCI outcomes in diabetic patients.","PeriodicalId":507812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Post PCI TIMI Flow Between Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Individuals\",\"authors\":\"A. Basit, Ashraf Abdul Qahir, Yusra, Sarfraz Ali Mangi, Muhammad Aslam, Vickee Kumar Mamtani\",\"doi\":\"10.61919/jhrr.v4i2.890\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, with diabetes significantly exacerbating the incidence and severity of coronary artery disease. Diabetic patients experience altered coronary blood flow dynamics, which can impact the efficacy of therapeutic interventions like percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).\\nObjective: This study aims to compare the post-PCI Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grades between diabetic and non-diabetic patients to assess the impact of diabetes on the short-term outcomes of coronary revascularization.\\nMethods: A retrospective observational study was conducted at the National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases in Karachi, involving 3,000 patients who underwent primary PCI between January 2018 and December 2020. Patients were categorized into diabetic (1,500) and non-diabetic (1,500) groups. Data collected included demographics, coronary artery risk factors, TIMI flow grades before and after PCI, and the use of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25, employing chi-square tests, t-tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests for comparative analysis, with a p-value of <0.05 considered statistically significant.\\nResults: The study found significant differences in postoperative TIMI3 flow rates, with non-diabetic patients achieving a higher rate of TIMI3 (59.4%) compared to diabetic patients (58.1%). The use of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors was higher in diabetic patients (34.7%) than in non-diabetic patients (1.8%). Additionally, diabetic patients showed a higher incidence of multi-vessel disease and more severe lesion profiles, including higher rates of triple branch lesions (45.9% vs. 39.9%) and left main lesions (53% vs. 43.9%).\\nConclusion: Diabetic patients exhibit worse post-PCI TIMI flow grades and more complex coronary lesions compared to non-diabetic patients, suggesting that diabetes adversely affects the outcomes of coronary revascularization. These findings underscore the need for tailored therapeutic approaches to improve PCI outcomes in diabetic patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i2.890\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i2.890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心血管疾病仍然是全球发病率和死亡率的主要原因,而糖尿病会大大增加冠状动脉疾病的发病率和严重程度。糖尿病患者的冠状动脉血流动力学发生改变,这可能会影响经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)等治疗干预措施的疗效:本研究旨在比较糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者PCI术后心肌梗死溶栓治疗(TIMI)血流分级,以评估糖尿病对冠状动脉血运重建术短期疗效的影响:卡拉奇国家心血管病研究所开展了一项回顾性观察研究,涉及2018年1月至2020年12月期间接受初级PCI的3000名患者。患者被分为糖尿病组(1500 人)和非糖尿病组(1500 人)。收集的数据包括人口统计学、冠状动脉危险因素、PCI前后的TIMI血流分级以及GPIIb/IIIa抑制剂的使用情况。统计分析采用 SPSS 25 版,比较分析采用卡方检验、t 检验和 Mann-Whitney U 检验,P 值小于 0.05 为具有统计学意义:研究发现术后TIMI3血流率存在明显差异,非糖尿病患者的TIMI3血流率(59.4%)高于糖尿病患者(58.1%)。糖尿病患者使用 GPIIb/IIIa 抑制剂的比例(34.7%)高于非糖尿病患者(1.8%)。此外,糖尿病患者的多血管疾病发生率更高,病变情况更严重,包括三支病变(45.9% 对 39.9%)和左主干病变(53% 对 43.9%)的发生率更高:结论:与非糖尿病患者相比,糖尿病患者PCI术后TIMI血流分级更差,冠状动脉病变更复杂,这表明糖尿病对冠状动脉血运重建的结果有不利影响。这些发现突出表明,有必要采取有针对性的治疗方法来改善糖尿病患者的 PCI 治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Post PCI TIMI Flow Between Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Individuals
Background: Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, with diabetes significantly exacerbating the incidence and severity of coronary artery disease. Diabetic patients experience altered coronary blood flow dynamics, which can impact the efficacy of therapeutic interventions like percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Objective: This study aims to compare the post-PCI Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grades between diabetic and non-diabetic patients to assess the impact of diabetes on the short-term outcomes of coronary revascularization. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted at the National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases in Karachi, involving 3,000 patients who underwent primary PCI between January 2018 and December 2020. Patients were categorized into diabetic (1,500) and non-diabetic (1,500) groups. Data collected included demographics, coronary artery risk factors, TIMI flow grades before and after PCI, and the use of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25, employing chi-square tests, t-tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests for comparative analysis, with a p-value of <0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: The study found significant differences in postoperative TIMI3 flow rates, with non-diabetic patients achieving a higher rate of TIMI3 (59.4%) compared to diabetic patients (58.1%). The use of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors was higher in diabetic patients (34.7%) than in non-diabetic patients (1.8%). Additionally, diabetic patients showed a higher incidence of multi-vessel disease and more severe lesion profiles, including higher rates of triple branch lesions (45.9% vs. 39.9%) and left main lesions (53% vs. 43.9%). Conclusion: Diabetic patients exhibit worse post-PCI TIMI flow grades and more complex coronary lesions compared to non-diabetic patients, suggesting that diabetes adversely affects the outcomes of coronary revascularization. These findings underscore the need for tailored therapeutic approaches to improve PCI outcomes in diabetic patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of Trace Elements in Pregnant Women with Malaria: A Case-Control Study Tissue Ablation Using Lasers: A Case Series Thirty-year Trend of Non-rheumatic Valvular Heart Disease: A Comparison of Pakistan with South Asia and Global Scenario A Randomized Control Study of Effectiveness of Aerobic Exercise Training and Balance Training on Balance in Patients with Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Impact of Routine Case Volume on Door-to-Device Time for Primary PCI Patients: The Concept of a Designated Primary PCI Cath Lab at a Large Volume Cardiac Center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1