气候变化背景下的融雪计算:极端日气温过程的单站点和多站点降尺度比较

IF 1.1 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1139/cjce-2024-0033
Mahzabeen Rahman, V.-T.-V. Nguyen
{"title":"气候变化背景下的融雪计算:极端日气温过程的单站点和多站点降尺度比较","authors":"Mahzabeen Rahman, V.-T.-V. Nguyen","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2024-0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focuses on how multisite downscaling procedures can provide a significant improvement in the accuracy of impact assessment results as compared to single-site downscaling techniques. The study compared the accuracy of snowmelt computations given by the multisite multivariate statistical downscaling (MMSD) method and the single site downscaling (SDSM) procedure. Results of an illustrative application using daily maximum (Tmax) and minimum (Tmin) temperature series at seven stations in southern Quebec-Ontario region in Canada indicated that MMSD method was able to reproduce accurately the observed spatial and temporal variabilities of daily extreme temperature processes over different locations. MMSD approach preserved more accurately the interstation correlations of daily Tmax (0.78 and 0.7) and Tmin (0.94 and 0.84) respectively for calibration and validation period than SDSM (0.08 and 0.11 for Tmax; and 0.02 for Tmin). MMSD was found capable to produce more accurate snowmelt estimations than those given by the SDSM.","PeriodicalId":9414,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Snowmelt Computations in the Climate Change Context: Comparison of Single Site and Multisite Downscaling of Extreme Daily Temperature Processes\",\"authors\":\"Mahzabeen Rahman, V.-T.-V. Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1139/cjce-2024-0033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study focuses on how multisite downscaling procedures can provide a significant improvement in the accuracy of impact assessment results as compared to single-site downscaling techniques. The study compared the accuracy of snowmelt computations given by the multisite multivariate statistical downscaling (MMSD) method and the single site downscaling (SDSM) procedure. Results of an illustrative application using daily maximum (Tmax) and minimum (Tmin) temperature series at seven stations in southern Quebec-Ontario region in Canada indicated that MMSD method was able to reproduce accurately the observed spatial and temporal variabilities of daily extreme temperature processes over different locations. MMSD approach preserved more accurately the interstation correlations of daily Tmax (0.78 and 0.7) and Tmin (0.94 and 0.84) respectively for calibration and validation period than SDSM (0.08 and 0.11 for Tmax; and 0.02 for Tmin). MMSD was found capable to produce more accurate snowmelt estimations than those given by the SDSM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2024-0033\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2024-0033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的重点是,与单站点降尺度技术相比,多站点降尺度程序如何显著提高影响评估结果的准确性。研究比较了多站点多元统计降尺度(MMSD)方法和单站点降尺度(SDSM)程序给出的融雪计算结果的准确性。使用加拿大魁北克-安大略省南部地区七个站点的日最高(Tmax)和最低(Tmin)温度序列进行说明性应用的结果表明,MMSD 方法能够准确再现不同地点观测到的日极端温度过程的时空变化。与 SDSM(Tmax 为 0.08 和 0.11;Tmin 为 0.02)相比,MMSD 方法更准确地保留了校准和验证期间每日 Tmax(0.78 和 0.7)和 Tmin(0.94 和 0.84)的站间相关性。与 SDSM 相比,MMSD 能够得出更准确的融雪估算结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On Snowmelt Computations in the Climate Change Context: Comparison of Single Site and Multisite Downscaling of Extreme Daily Temperature Processes
This study focuses on how multisite downscaling procedures can provide a significant improvement in the accuracy of impact assessment results as compared to single-site downscaling techniques. The study compared the accuracy of snowmelt computations given by the multisite multivariate statistical downscaling (MMSD) method and the single site downscaling (SDSM) procedure. Results of an illustrative application using daily maximum (Tmax) and minimum (Tmin) temperature series at seven stations in southern Quebec-Ontario region in Canada indicated that MMSD method was able to reproduce accurately the observed spatial and temporal variabilities of daily extreme temperature processes over different locations. MMSD approach preserved more accurately the interstation correlations of daily Tmax (0.78 and 0.7) and Tmin (0.94 and 0.84) respectively for calibration and validation period than SDSM (0.08 and 0.11 for Tmax; and 0.02 for Tmin). MMSD was found capable to produce more accurate snowmelt estimations than those given by the SDSM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering
Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
105
审稿时长
14 months
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering is the official journal of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering. It contains articles on environmental engineering, hydrotechnical engineering, structural engineering, construction engineering, engineering mechanics, engineering materials, and history of civil engineering. Contributors include recognized researchers and practitioners in industry, government, and academia. New developments in engineering design and construction are also featured.
期刊最新文献
Application of Reliability Models for Crash Frequency Analysis: Implications for Network-wide Safety Performance Quantifying changes in floods under different bathymetry conditions for a lake setting Quantifying the effectiveness of an active treatment in improving highway-railway grade crossing safety in Canada: an empirical Bayes observational before–after study Utilization of marble waste as fine aggregate in the composition of high performance concrete containing mineral additions Local Calibration of Flexible Performance Models Using Maximum Likelihood Estimation Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1