布莱登量表在奥地利急症和长期护理环境中的结构效度:结构方程模型分析

Petra Schumacher, E. Santos, Bettina Wandl, Gerhard Mueller
{"title":"布莱登量表在奥地利急症和长期护理环境中的结构效度:结构方程模型分析","authors":"Petra Schumacher, E. Santos, Bettina Wandl, Gerhard Mueller","doi":"10.5430/jnep.v14n8p44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The Braden scale is frequently used to assess pressure ulcer risk in health care settings. Selected psychometric properties have been tested using various methods of classical test theory in international studies. However, limited information on construct validity is available. Aim was to determine if the Braden subscale items correlate with the construct pressure ulcer risk and whether the construct validity concerning the factor structure of the Braden scale is adequate in acute and long-term settings.Methods: A quantitative design with secondary analysis of data from one acute (n = 328) and eight long-term care facilities (n = 311) in Austria was used to test construct validity. Data analysis included principal axis factor analysis with Promax rotation and assessment of internal consistency, followed by structural equation modeling.Results: For the acute care setting, a structure equation model with two latent factors and for the long-term care setting with one latent factor was tested according to principal axis factoring results. The Braden subscale items correlated with the construct pressure ulcer risk. Almost all examined model fit indices were within recommended reference values. Thus, the construct validity of the Braden scale was adequate in both settings.Conclusions: The factor structure in the acute care setting did not match that in the investigated long-term care setting. Further research regarding the construct validity of the Braden scale is therefore necessary.","PeriodicalId":73866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing education and practice","volume":"59 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Construct validity of the Braden scale in acute- and long-term care settings in Austria: A structural equation modeling analysis\",\"authors\":\"Petra Schumacher, E. Santos, Bettina Wandl, Gerhard Mueller\",\"doi\":\"10.5430/jnep.v14n8p44\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The Braden scale is frequently used to assess pressure ulcer risk in health care settings. Selected psychometric properties have been tested using various methods of classical test theory in international studies. However, limited information on construct validity is available. Aim was to determine if the Braden subscale items correlate with the construct pressure ulcer risk and whether the construct validity concerning the factor structure of the Braden scale is adequate in acute and long-term settings.Methods: A quantitative design with secondary analysis of data from one acute (n = 328) and eight long-term care facilities (n = 311) in Austria was used to test construct validity. Data analysis included principal axis factor analysis with Promax rotation and assessment of internal consistency, followed by structural equation modeling.Results: For the acute care setting, a structure equation model with two latent factors and for the long-term care setting with one latent factor was tested according to principal axis factoring results. The Braden subscale items correlated with the construct pressure ulcer risk. Almost all examined model fit indices were within recommended reference values. Thus, the construct validity of the Braden scale was adequate in both settings.Conclusions: The factor structure in the acute care setting did not match that in the investigated long-term care setting. Further research regarding the construct validity of the Braden scale is therefore necessary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nursing education and practice\",\"volume\":\"59 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nursing education and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v14n8p44\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing education and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v14n8p44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:布莱登量表常用于评估医疗机构中的压疮风险。在国际研究中,已使用经典测试理论的各种方法对其部分心理测量特性进行了测试。然而,有关构建效度的信息却很有限。本研究旨在确定布莱登量表的子量表项目是否与压疮风险结构相关,以及布莱登量表的因子结构在急性和长期环境中是否具有足够的结构效度:方法:采用定量设计,对奥地利一家急症护理机构(n = 328)和八家长期护理机构(n = 311)的数据进行二次分析,以检验结构效度。数据分析包括主轴因子分析(Promax rotation)和内部一致性评估,然后进行结构方程建模:根据主轴因子分析结果,对急症护理环境和长期护理环境的结构方程模型分别进行了测试。布莱登分量表项目与压疮风险结构相关。几乎所有考察的模型拟合指数都在推荐的参考值范围内。因此,布莱登量表在两种情况下都具有足够的建构效度:结论:急症护理环境中的因子结构与所调查的长期护理环境中的因子结构并不一致。因此,有必要对布莱登量表的结构效度进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Construct validity of the Braden scale in acute- and long-term care settings in Austria: A structural equation modeling analysis
Objective: The Braden scale is frequently used to assess pressure ulcer risk in health care settings. Selected psychometric properties have been tested using various methods of classical test theory in international studies. However, limited information on construct validity is available. Aim was to determine if the Braden subscale items correlate with the construct pressure ulcer risk and whether the construct validity concerning the factor structure of the Braden scale is adequate in acute and long-term settings.Methods: A quantitative design with secondary analysis of data from one acute (n = 328) and eight long-term care facilities (n = 311) in Austria was used to test construct validity. Data analysis included principal axis factor analysis with Promax rotation and assessment of internal consistency, followed by structural equation modeling.Results: For the acute care setting, a structure equation model with two latent factors and for the long-term care setting with one latent factor was tested according to principal axis factoring results. The Braden subscale items correlated with the construct pressure ulcer risk. Almost all examined model fit indices were within recommended reference values. Thus, the construct validity of the Braden scale was adequate in both settings.Conclusions: The factor structure in the acute care setting did not match that in the investigated long-term care setting. Further research regarding the construct validity of the Braden scale is therefore necessary.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“What are we doing here?”: Reflections on developing a transcultural “Road Map” for global menstrual hygiene management Analysis of nurses’ intention to resign and its reasons in a tertiary Grade-A hospital in Beijing during the post-pandemic era Utilizing learning communities to enhance classroom and clinical synergy across the curriculum Contraceptive use in the Gaza Strip: A systematic review Supporting graduate students’ skills with simulated experiences in a professional foundation course
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1