重新设计法律援助机构条例,提高法律清晰度

S. Prasetyorini, Edy Lisdiyono, Sri Mulyani
{"title":"重新设计法律援助机构条例,提高法律清晰度","authors":"S. Prasetyorini, Edy Lisdiyono, Sri Mulyani","doi":"10.55908/sdgs.v12i5.3418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: to examine in depth the current LBH establishment arrangements. In addition, this study aims to formulate a regulatory formula for the formation of LBH that is appropriate and in accordance with the applicable legal context, with the main aim of realizing better legal certainty in supporting the mission of LBH in providing legal assistance to the community.\n \nMethods/design/approach: This research uses qualitative methods with a prescriptive research approach by describing data findings, both primary and secondary data, that have been processed and analyzed.\n \nResults: This research found that the regulations for the establishment of LAI/LAO in Indonesia need to be clarified, especially in terms of the status of the legal entity used. The status of the foundation dominates so that it becomes biased in carrying out its role as a legal aid institution to the community with consistency in the principles of the foundation regulated in Indonesian law. It is necessary to reformulate regulations that are more transparent and comprehensive for advocacy principles and can provide legal assistance to the community properly without being bound by limitations that may exist in the Foundation law.\n \nConclusion: The dominant legal entity status for the Legal Aid Institute is in the form of a Foundation, a form of Foundation legal entity that has been the most appropriate to establish LAI/LAO in Indonesia because it has advantages, the foundation is non-profit and has no members, so it is more independent and cannot be intervened by any party. The provisions of legal entities in the Legal Aid Law, which are currently still based on Foundations and Associations, need to be supported by supervisory requirements in their implementation so as not to violate the essence of the enactment of the Foundation Law. Reformulation must result in clear legal aid institutions, protect human rights, provide equal access to justice, and achieve the desired level of legal certainty.","PeriodicalId":510463,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Sustainable Development","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"REIMAGINING LEGAL AID INSTITUTION REGULATIONS TO ENHANCE LEGAL CLARITY\",\"authors\":\"S. Prasetyorini, Edy Lisdiyono, Sri Mulyani\",\"doi\":\"10.55908/sdgs.v12i5.3418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: to examine in depth the current LBH establishment arrangements. In addition, this study aims to formulate a regulatory formula for the formation of LBH that is appropriate and in accordance with the applicable legal context, with the main aim of realizing better legal certainty in supporting the mission of LBH in providing legal assistance to the community.\\n \\nMethods/design/approach: This research uses qualitative methods with a prescriptive research approach by describing data findings, both primary and secondary data, that have been processed and analyzed.\\n \\nResults: This research found that the regulations for the establishment of LAI/LAO in Indonesia need to be clarified, especially in terms of the status of the legal entity used. The status of the foundation dominates so that it becomes biased in carrying out its role as a legal aid institution to the community with consistency in the principles of the foundation regulated in Indonesian law. It is necessary to reformulate regulations that are more transparent and comprehensive for advocacy principles and can provide legal assistance to the community properly without being bound by limitations that may exist in the Foundation law.\\n \\nConclusion: The dominant legal entity status for the Legal Aid Institute is in the form of a Foundation, a form of Foundation legal entity that has been the most appropriate to establish LAI/LAO in Indonesia because it has advantages, the foundation is non-profit and has no members, so it is more independent and cannot be intervened by any party. The provisions of legal entities in the Legal Aid Law, which are currently still based on Foundations and Associations, need to be supported by supervisory requirements in their implementation so as not to violate the essence of the enactment of the Foundation Law. Reformulation must result in clear legal aid institutions, protect human rights, provide equal access to justice, and achieve the desired level of legal certainty.\",\"PeriodicalId\":510463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Law and Sustainable Development\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Law and Sustainable Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i5.3418\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i5.3418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:深入探討現行成立雷曼兄弟的安排。此外,本研究亦旨在制定一套合適及符合適用法律情況的法 院規管模式,以達致更明確的法律規定,支持法 院履行為社會提供法律援助的使命。方法/设计/途径:本研究采用定性研究方法,通过描述经过处理和分析的一手和二手数据结果,对研究方法进行规范。结果:本研究发现,印度尼西亚关于成立 LAI/LAO 的法规需要澄清,特别是在所使用的法律实体的地位方面。基金会的地位占主导地位,使其在履行作为社区法律援助机构的职责时出现偏差,与印尼法律规定的基金会原则不符。有必要重新制定条例,使其更加透明和全面地宣传原则,并能够为社区提供适当的法律援 助,而不受《基金会法》中可能存在的限制的约束。结论:法律援助机构的主要法律实体地位是基金会形式,这种基金会法律实体形式最适合在印尼建立法律援助机构/法律援助办公室,因为它具有以下优势:基金会是非营利性的,没有成员,因此更加独立,不受任何方面的干预。法律援助法》中关于法律实体的规定目前仍以基金会和协会为基础,在执行过程中需要有监督要求的支持,以免违背《基金会法》的颁布本质。重新制定的结果必须是明确的法律援助机构,保护人权,提供平等诉诸司法的机会,并达到预期的法律确定性水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
REIMAGINING LEGAL AID INSTITUTION REGULATIONS TO ENHANCE LEGAL CLARITY
Purpose: to examine in depth the current LBH establishment arrangements. In addition, this study aims to formulate a regulatory formula for the formation of LBH that is appropriate and in accordance with the applicable legal context, with the main aim of realizing better legal certainty in supporting the mission of LBH in providing legal assistance to the community.   Methods/design/approach: This research uses qualitative methods with a prescriptive research approach by describing data findings, both primary and secondary data, that have been processed and analyzed.   Results: This research found that the regulations for the establishment of LAI/LAO in Indonesia need to be clarified, especially in terms of the status of the legal entity used. The status of the foundation dominates so that it becomes biased in carrying out its role as a legal aid institution to the community with consistency in the principles of the foundation regulated in Indonesian law. It is necessary to reformulate regulations that are more transparent and comprehensive for advocacy principles and can provide legal assistance to the community properly without being bound by limitations that may exist in the Foundation law.   Conclusion: The dominant legal entity status for the Legal Aid Institute is in the form of a Foundation, a form of Foundation legal entity that has been the most appropriate to establish LAI/LAO in Indonesia because it has advantages, the foundation is non-profit and has no members, so it is more independent and cannot be intervened by any party. The provisions of legal entities in the Legal Aid Law, which are currently still based on Foundations and Associations, need to be supported by supervisory requirements in their implementation so as not to violate the essence of the enactment of the Foundation Law. Reformulation must result in clear legal aid institutions, protect human rights, provide equal access to justice, and achieve the desired level of legal certainty.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ABOUT ONE INNOVATION NUMERICAL METHOD FOR SOLVING ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS OF HIGHER ORDERS SOUTH AFRICAN MIGRATION POLICY ON THE ZIMBABWEAN SPECIAL PERMIT RENEWAL EXPERIENCE: DIPLOMACY OF WEAPONS FOR POWER METHODS OF STATE ACQUISITION OF PRIVATE PROPERTY UNDER LAW NO. 23-17 AND ITS IMPACT ON THE PRINCIPLES OF LEGAL SECURITY CONSANGUINEOUS MARRIAGE BETWEEN SHARIA, LAW AND MEDICINE PROJECT MANAGEMENT APPROACH IN HEALTHCARE SERVICES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1