评估全球城市二氧化碳清除量

Quirina Rodriguez Mendez, Sabine Fuss, Sarah Lück, Felix Creutzig
{"title":"评估全球城市二氧化碳清除量","authors":"Quirina Rodriguez Mendez, Sabine Fuss, Sarah Lück, Felix Creutzig","doi":"10.1038/s44284-024-00069-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Here, with the aim of supporting the path to achieving net-zero emissions in cities, we assess the existing literature on carbon dioxide removal (CDR) at the urban scale, seeking to quantify the potential negative emissions contribution of cities globally. Urban CDR options considered here include the storage of carbon in urban vegetation, soils and buildings, and the capture of CO2 from indoor environments via decentralized direct air capture. Our estimates of carbon storage and capture potentials indicate that deploying CDR options at the urban scale could make a substantial contribution to global mitigation of climate change, alongside supporting the upscaling of climate action from local to regional and national scale. The associated human and environmental well-being effects strengthen the case for cities as carbon sinks. Any upscale of the reviewed technologies is nevertheless constrained by several uncertainties, economic barriers and governance issues that pose substantial challenges to their implementation. From these, we identify key research gaps and recommendations for future research centered around the need for additional field deployments, consideration of the particularities of different urban geographies and socioeconomic contexts, and the establishment of robust cross-sectoral carbon accounting methodologies. Focusing on the carbon storage potential of urban vegetation, soils and buildings, this Article assesses the literature on carbon dioxide removal at the urban scale. With the prospect of making cities into carbon sinks, the authors identify research gaps and recommendations related to governance, economic barriers and implementation.","PeriodicalId":501700,"journal":{"name":"Nature Cities","volume":"1 6","pages":"413-423"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing global urban CO2 removal\",\"authors\":\"Quirina Rodriguez Mendez, Sabine Fuss, Sarah Lück, Felix Creutzig\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s44284-024-00069-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Here, with the aim of supporting the path to achieving net-zero emissions in cities, we assess the existing literature on carbon dioxide removal (CDR) at the urban scale, seeking to quantify the potential negative emissions contribution of cities globally. Urban CDR options considered here include the storage of carbon in urban vegetation, soils and buildings, and the capture of CO2 from indoor environments via decentralized direct air capture. Our estimates of carbon storage and capture potentials indicate that deploying CDR options at the urban scale could make a substantial contribution to global mitigation of climate change, alongside supporting the upscaling of climate action from local to regional and national scale. The associated human and environmental well-being effects strengthen the case for cities as carbon sinks. Any upscale of the reviewed technologies is nevertheless constrained by several uncertainties, economic barriers and governance issues that pose substantial challenges to their implementation. From these, we identify key research gaps and recommendations for future research centered around the need for additional field deployments, consideration of the particularities of different urban geographies and socioeconomic contexts, and the establishment of robust cross-sectoral carbon accounting methodologies. Focusing on the carbon storage potential of urban vegetation, soils and buildings, this Article assesses the literature on carbon dioxide removal at the urban scale. With the prospect of making cities into carbon sinks, the authors identify research gaps and recommendations related to governance, economic barriers and implementation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Cities\",\"volume\":\"1 6\",\"pages\":\"413-423\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Cities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44284-024-00069-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Cities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44284-024-00069-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在此,为了支持城市实现净零排放,我们评估了有关城市规模二氧化碳清除(CDR)的现有文献,以量化全球城市潜在的负排放贡献。在此考虑的城市 CDR 方案包括在城市植被、土壤和建筑物中储存碳,以及通过分散式直接空气捕获从室内环境中捕获二氧化碳。我们对碳封存和捕集潜力的估算表明,在城市范围内部署 CDR 方案可以为全球减缓气候变化做出重大贡献,同时支持将气候行动从地方扩展到区域和国家范围。相关的人类和环境福祉效应加强了城市作为碳汇的理由。然而,所审查技术的任何升级都会受到一些不确定因素、经济障碍和治理问题的制约,这对其实施构成了巨大挑战。由此,我们确定了主要的研究差距和未来研究建议,这些差距和建议主要集中在需要更多的实地部署、考虑不同城市地域和社会经济背景的特殊性以及建立健全的跨部门碳核算方法。本文以城市植被、土壤和建筑的碳储存潜力为重点,评估了有关城市规模二氧化碳清除的文献。考虑到使城市成为碳汇的前景,作者指出了与治理、经济障碍和实施相关的研究差距和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing global urban CO2 removal
Here, with the aim of supporting the path to achieving net-zero emissions in cities, we assess the existing literature on carbon dioxide removal (CDR) at the urban scale, seeking to quantify the potential negative emissions contribution of cities globally. Urban CDR options considered here include the storage of carbon in urban vegetation, soils and buildings, and the capture of CO2 from indoor environments via decentralized direct air capture. Our estimates of carbon storage and capture potentials indicate that deploying CDR options at the urban scale could make a substantial contribution to global mitigation of climate change, alongside supporting the upscaling of climate action from local to regional and national scale. The associated human and environmental well-being effects strengthen the case for cities as carbon sinks. Any upscale of the reviewed technologies is nevertheless constrained by several uncertainties, economic barriers and governance issues that pose substantial challenges to their implementation. From these, we identify key research gaps and recommendations for future research centered around the need for additional field deployments, consideration of the particularities of different urban geographies and socioeconomic contexts, and the establishment of robust cross-sectoral carbon accounting methodologies. Focusing on the carbon storage potential of urban vegetation, soils and buildings, this Article assesses the literature on carbon dioxide removal at the urban scale. With the prospect of making cities into carbon sinks, the authors identify research gaps and recommendations related to governance, economic barriers and implementation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From local to global and in between, urban context counts Long-term exposure to ambient benzene and brain disorders among urban adults Regulation of humid heat by urban green space across a climate wetness gradient Criminal governance and social order in Nottingham, England Unequal access to social, environmental and health amenities in US urban parks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1