东欧旧石器时代上层便携式艺术中的几何图像:一些文化、年代和地区特征

IF 0.6 4区 地球科学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Anthropologie Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.anthro.2024.103269
Gennady A. Khlopachev
{"title":"东欧旧石器时代上层便携式艺术中的几何图像:一些文化、年代和地区特征","authors":"Gennady A. Khlopachev","doi":"10.1016/j.anthro.2024.103269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Abstract, geometric, and also ornamental images which could not be directly decrypted are one of plots of iconic portable art of Eastern Europe. This type of pictorial activity emerges already during the early phase of the Upper Paleolithic simultaneously with figurative art. Development of iconic and ornamental art could be traced in the Russian Plain during the whole Upper Paleolithic epoch. It was mostly widespread during the Middle (25–21,000 BP) and Late (20–12,000 BP) phases of the Upper Paleolithic. Geometric art existed side by side with tradition of realistic engravings of humans and animals during the Gravettian time, and it entirely displaces the latter after the Late Glacial maximum. The article systematizes data about ornamental geometric images of the center of the Russian Plain dealing with regional and chronological peculiarities of this type of art. Basing on the data of technical and morphological analyses the author suggests two criteria for differentiation of ornaments in portable art of the Gravettian and Epigravettian time: <strong>1.</strong> Presence/absence of organic combination of geometric and realistic elements in one image; <strong>2.</strong> Character and technique of zonal ornamentation of the surface of artefacts with complicated shape. Geometric ornamentation was engraved on the whole surface of artefacts with complicated shape with obligatory preliminary mark-up, and also use of one or several base lines for creation of such images at Epigravettian sites. Elements composing one geometric design could be engraved on artefacts with complex volume during different episodes, and consequently without preliminary preparation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46860,"journal":{"name":"Anthropologie","volume":"128 2","pages":"Article 103269"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geometric images in portable art of the Upper Paleolithic of Eastern Europe: Some cultural, chronological and regional peculiarities\",\"authors\":\"Gennady A. Khlopachev\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anthro.2024.103269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Abstract, geometric, and also ornamental images which could not be directly decrypted are one of plots of iconic portable art of Eastern Europe. This type of pictorial activity emerges already during the early phase of the Upper Paleolithic simultaneously with figurative art. Development of iconic and ornamental art could be traced in the Russian Plain during the whole Upper Paleolithic epoch. It was mostly widespread during the Middle (25–21,000 BP) and Late (20–12,000 BP) phases of the Upper Paleolithic. Geometric art existed side by side with tradition of realistic engravings of humans and animals during the Gravettian time, and it entirely displaces the latter after the Late Glacial maximum. The article systematizes data about ornamental geometric images of the center of the Russian Plain dealing with regional and chronological peculiarities of this type of art. Basing on the data of technical and morphological analyses the author suggests two criteria for differentiation of ornaments in portable art of the Gravettian and Epigravettian time: <strong>1.</strong> Presence/absence of organic combination of geometric and realistic elements in one image; <strong>2.</strong> Character and technique of zonal ornamentation of the surface of artefacts with complicated shape. Geometric ornamentation was engraved on the whole surface of artefacts with complicated shape with obligatory preliminary mark-up, and also use of one or several base lines for creation of such images at Epigravettian sites. Elements composing one geometric design could be engraved on artefacts with complex volume during different episodes, and consequently without preliminary preparation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropologie\",\"volume\":\"128 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 103269\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003552124000505\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropologie","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003552124000505","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无法直接解密的抽象、几何和装饰图像是东欧标志性便携式艺术的一大特色。这种绘画活动在旧石器时代早期就已经出现,与具象艺术同时出现。在整个旧石器时代上层时期,俄罗斯平原都可以追溯到标志性和装饰性艺术的发展。在旧石器时代中期(25,000-21,000 BP)和晚期(20,000-12,000 BP),这种艺术最为普遍。在格拉维蒂时期,几何艺术与人类和动物的写实雕刻传统并存,在晚冰川期之后,几何艺术完全取代了后者。文章对俄罗斯平原中心的装饰性几何图像数据进行了系统整理,涉及此类艺术的地区和年代特征。在技术和形态分析数据的基础上,作者提出了区分格拉维特和上格拉维特时期便携式艺术装饰品的两个标准:1.在一个图像中是否存在几何和现实元素的有机结合;2.具有复杂形状的文物表面分区装饰的特征和技术。在埃皮格拉维蒂遗址,几何装饰被雕刻在形状复杂的文物的整个表面上,并带有强制性的初步标记,还使用一条或数条基线来创建此类图像。组成一个几何图案的元素可以在不同时期雕刻在体积复杂的文物上,因此不需要事先准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Geometric images in portable art of the Upper Paleolithic of Eastern Europe: Some cultural, chronological and regional peculiarities

Abstract, geometric, and also ornamental images which could not be directly decrypted are one of plots of iconic portable art of Eastern Europe. This type of pictorial activity emerges already during the early phase of the Upper Paleolithic simultaneously with figurative art. Development of iconic and ornamental art could be traced in the Russian Plain during the whole Upper Paleolithic epoch. It was mostly widespread during the Middle (25–21,000 BP) and Late (20–12,000 BP) phases of the Upper Paleolithic. Geometric art existed side by side with tradition of realistic engravings of humans and animals during the Gravettian time, and it entirely displaces the latter after the Late Glacial maximum. The article systematizes data about ornamental geometric images of the center of the Russian Plain dealing with regional and chronological peculiarities of this type of art. Basing on the data of technical and morphological analyses the author suggests two criteria for differentiation of ornaments in portable art of the Gravettian and Epigravettian time: 1. Presence/absence of organic combination of geometric and realistic elements in one image; 2. Character and technique of zonal ornamentation of the surface of artefacts with complicated shape. Geometric ornamentation was engraved on the whole surface of artefacts with complicated shape with obligatory preliminary mark-up, and also use of one or several base lines for creation of such images at Epigravettian sites. Elements composing one geometric design could be engraved on artefacts with complex volume during different episodes, and consequently without preliminary preparation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anthropologie
Anthropologie ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: First published in 1890, Anthropologie remains one of the most important journals devoted to prehistoric sciences and paleoanthropology. It regularly publishes thematic issues, originalsarticles and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Les monuments funéraires et cultuels du Sahara central (Algérie) : définitions et classifications Une sépulture mésolithique douteuse sans relation archéo-stratigraphique dans la grotte du Rond-du-Barry (Polignac, Haute-Loire, France) Deux cas de façonnage dentaire rituel au Néolithique en Europe. Dolmen A1 de la nécropole de Chenon (Charente, France) A “shaman” burial from the PPNA settlement of Çemka Höyük, Upper Tigris Basin, Turkiye
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1