醫學中心評鑑的醫療品質暨病人安全

李三剛 李三剛
{"title":"醫學中心評鑑的醫療品質暨病人安全","authors":"李三剛 李三剛","doi":"10.53106/199457952024051803002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n 2023年醫院評鑑暨教學醫院評鑑於臺北區與北區有14家醫院參加醫學中心評鑑,分析統計醫學中心任務指標任務三卓越的醫療品質與病人安全的4個項次9條基準32款評分說明的執行結果,大部分皆能達到評分說明的要求,有少數醫院可能未在任務指標審查資料表說明,或缺少部分內容,但整體都能呈現出卓越的醫療品質與病人安全成果。不過醫院投入醫品病安金額占醫院總收入的佔比差異很大,臺灣病人安全通報系統(TPR)件數與其他全院性通報系統之通報件數,每家醫院呈報的數字差異也很大,可能與醫院規定的病人安全通報類別與流程不同導致,將來也許需要清楚的界定。2023年醫學中心評鑑結果,各醫院評鑑成績持續進步,差異逐漸縮小,14家申請醫學中心評鑑之13家醫院,成績均達醫學中心評鑑標準,顯示參加醫學中心評鑑的醫院,都具有一定的水準,尤其醫療品質與病人安全皆能按照任務三的基準執行,得到良好的表現。建議以後,除落實執行衛福部規定的醫療品質及病人安全工作目標外,病人安全通報(TPR)後,進行根本原因分析(RCA)應確實按照衛福部「病人安全事件根本原因分析作業程序」參考指引執行,找出造成重大病安事件或流程執行失效根本原因,提出具體改善措施,以防止再次發生危害事件的機會。\n In 2023, 14 hospitals in Taipei and in the North District of Taiwan applied for Hospital and Teaching Hospital Accreditation. An analysis and compilation of the implementation results of the medical center’s mission indicators for Mission Three, “Excellent Medical Quality and Patient Safety,” revealed 4 categories, 9 standards, and 32 scoring instruction items. The majority of the implementation results met the requirements of the scoring instructions. A few hospitals may not have provided explanations in the mission indicator review information sheet or may have been missing some content, but overall, they demonstrated excellent medical quality and patient safety results. Nevertheless, the proportion of each hospital’s investment in medical quality and patient safety relative to its total revenue varied greatly. The number of reports submitted to the Taiwan patient safety reporting system and other hospital-wide reporting systems also differed greatly among hospitals, possibly due to differences in the patient safety notification categories and procedures prescribed by each institution. These aspects may require clearer definition in the future. The medical center accreditation results demonstrated continued improvement in each hospital’s scores, with the differences gradually narrowing. In total, 13 out of the 14 hospitals that applied for medical center accreditation achieved scores that met the accreditation standards, demonstrating a certain level of excellence, particularly in implementing Mission Three’s standards for medical quality and patient safety and achieving good performance. In the future, hospitals should not only implement the medical quality and patient safety goals stipulated by the Ministry of Health and Welfare but also conduct root cause analyses following Taiwan patient safety reporting system in accordance with the Ministry of Health and Welfare’s \"\"Root Cause Analyses Operational Procedures for Patient Safety Incidents.\"\" Hospitals should identify the root causes of major health and safety incidents or process execution failures and propose specific improvement measures to prevent the recurrence of hazardous incidents.\n \n","PeriodicalId":260200,"journal":{"name":"醫療品質雜誌","volume":"323 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"醫學中心評鑑的醫療品質暨病人安全\",\"authors\":\"李三剛 李三剛\",\"doi\":\"10.53106/199457952024051803002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n 2023年醫院評鑑暨教學醫院評鑑於臺北區與北區有14家醫院參加醫學中心評鑑,分析統計醫學中心任務指標任務三卓越的醫療品質與病人安全的4個項次9條基準32款評分說明的執行結果,大部分皆能達到評分說明的要求,有少數醫院可能未在任務指標審查資料表說明,或缺少部分內容,但整體都能呈現出卓越的醫療品質與病人安全成果。不過醫院投入醫品病安金額占醫院總收入的佔比差異很大,臺灣病人安全通報系統(TPR)件數與其他全院性通報系統之通報件數,每家醫院呈報的數字差異也很大,可能與醫院規定的病人安全通報類別與流程不同導致,將來也許需要清楚的界定。2023年醫學中心評鑑結果,各醫院評鑑成績持續進步,差異逐漸縮小,14家申請醫學中心評鑑之13家醫院,成績均達醫學中心評鑑標準,顯示參加醫學中心評鑑的醫院,都具有一定的水準,尤其醫療品質與病人安全皆能按照任務三的基準執行,得到良好的表現。建議以後,除落實執行衛福部規定的醫療品質及病人安全工作目標外,病人安全通報(TPR)後,進行根本原因分析(RCA)應確實按照衛福部「病人安全事件根本原因分析作業程序」參考指引執行,找出造成重大病安事件或流程執行失效根本原因,提出具體改善措施,以防止再次發生危害事件的機會。\\n In 2023, 14 hospitals in Taipei and in the North District of Taiwan applied for Hospital and Teaching Hospital Accreditation. An analysis and compilation of the implementation results of the medical center’s mission indicators for Mission Three, “Excellent Medical Quality and Patient Safety,” revealed 4 categories, 9 standards, and 32 scoring instruction items. The majority of the implementation results met the requirements of the scoring instructions. A few hospitals may not have provided explanations in the mission indicator review information sheet or may have been missing some content, but overall, they demonstrated excellent medical quality and patient safety results. Nevertheless, the proportion of each hospital’s investment in medical quality and patient safety relative to its total revenue varied greatly. The number of reports submitted to the Taiwan patient safety reporting system and other hospital-wide reporting systems also differed greatly among hospitals, possibly due to differences in the patient safety notification categories and procedures prescribed by each institution. These aspects may require clearer definition in the future. The medical center accreditation results demonstrated continued improvement in each hospital’s scores, with the differences gradually narrowing. In total, 13 out of the 14 hospitals that applied for medical center accreditation achieved scores that met the accreditation standards, demonstrating a certain level of excellence, particularly in implementing Mission Three’s standards for medical quality and patient safety and achieving good performance. In the future, hospitals should not only implement the medical quality and patient safety goals stipulated by the Ministry of Health and Welfare but also conduct root cause analyses following Taiwan patient safety reporting system in accordance with the Ministry of Health and Welfare’s \\\"\\\"Root Cause Analyses Operational Procedures for Patient Safety Incidents.\\\"\\\" Hospitals should identify the root causes of major health and safety incidents or process execution failures and propose specific improvement measures to prevent the recurrence of hazardous incidents.\\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":260200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"醫療品質雜誌\",\"volume\":\"323 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"醫療品質雜誌\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53106/199457952024051803002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"醫療品質雜誌","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53106/199457952024051803002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2023年醫院評鑑暨教學醫院評鑑於臺北區與北區有14家醫院參加醫學中心評鑑,分析統計醫學中心任務指標任務三卓越的醫療品質與病人安全的4個項次9條基準32款評分說明的執行結果,大部分皆能達到評分說明的要求,有少數醫院可能未在任務指標審查資料表說明,或缺少部分內容,但整體都能呈現出卓越的醫療品質與病人安全成果。不過醫院投入醫品病安金額占醫院總收入的佔比差異很大,臺灣病人安全通報系統(TPR)件數與其他全院性通報系統之通報件數,每家醫院呈報的數字差異也很大,可能與醫院規定的病人安全通報類別與流程不同導致,將來也許需要清楚的界定。2023年醫學中心評鑑結果,各醫院評鑑成績持續進步,差異逐漸縮小,14家申請醫學中心評鑑之13家醫院,成績均達醫學中心評鑑標準,顯示參加醫學中心評鑑的醫院,都具有一定的水準,尤其醫療品在2023年、台北市及北区 14 家医院申请医院及教学医院评审。通过对医疗中心使命三 "卓越的医疗质量和患者安全 "的使命指标实施结果进行分析和汇总,发现有 4 个类别、9 个标准和 32 个评分说明项目。大部分实施结果符合评分说明的要求。少数医院可能没有在使命指标审核信息表中提供说明,或缺少某些内容,但总体而言,这些医院在医疗质量和患者安全方面的成果非常出色。然而,每家医院在医疗质量和患者安全方面的投入占总收入的比例差异很大。各医院向台湾患者安全报告系统和其他全院报告系统提交的报告数量也有很大差异,这可能是由于各机构规定的患者安全通报类别和程序不同造成的。这些方面今后可能需要更明确的定义。医疗中心评审结果表明,各家医院的得分都在持续提高,差距逐渐缩小。在申请医疗中心评审的 14 家医院中,共有 13 家医院的得分达到了评审标准,显示出一定的水平,尤其是在执行任务三的医疗质量和患者安全标准方面,取得了良好的成绩。今后,医院不仅要落实厚生省规定的医疗质量和患者安全目标,还要按照厚生省《患者安全事件根本原因分析操作规程》,在台湾患者安全报告系统后进行根本原因分析。医院应找出重大健康与安全事故或流程执行失败的根本原因,并提出具体的改进措施,以防止危险事故再次发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
醫學中心評鑑的醫療品質暨病人安全
2023年醫院評鑑暨教學醫院評鑑於臺北區與北區有14家醫院參加醫學中心評鑑,分析統計醫學中心任務指標任務三卓越的醫療品質與病人安全的4個項次9條基準32款評分說明的執行結果,大部分皆能達到評分說明的要求,有少數醫院可能未在任務指標審查資料表說明,或缺少部分內容,但整體都能呈現出卓越的醫療品質與病人安全成果。不過醫院投入醫品病安金額占醫院總收入的佔比差異很大,臺灣病人安全通報系統(TPR)件數與其他全院性通報系統之通報件數,每家醫院呈報的數字差異也很大,可能與醫院規定的病人安全通報類別與流程不同導致,將來也許需要清楚的界定。2023年醫學中心評鑑結果,各醫院評鑑成績持續進步,差異逐漸縮小,14家申請醫學中心評鑑之13家醫院,成績均達醫學中心評鑑標準,顯示參加醫學中心評鑑的醫院,都具有一定的水準,尤其醫療品質與病人安全皆能按照任務三的基準執行,得到良好的表現。建議以後,除落實執行衛福部規定的醫療品質及病人安全工作目標外,病人安全通報(TPR)後,進行根本原因分析(RCA)應確實按照衛福部「病人安全事件根本原因分析作業程序」參考指引執行,找出造成重大病安事件或流程執行失效根本原因,提出具體改善措施,以防止再次發生危害事件的機會。  In 2023, 14 hospitals in Taipei and in the North District of Taiwan applied for Hospital and Teaching Hospital Accreditation. An analysis and compilation of the implementation results of the medical center’s mission indicators for Mission Three, “Excellent Medical Quality and Patient Safety,” revealed 4 categories, 9 standards, and 32 scoring instruction items. The majority of the implementation results met the requirements of the scoring instructions. A few hospitals may not have provided explanations in the mission indicator review information sheet or may have been missing some content, but overall, they demonstrated excellent medical quality and patient safety results. Nevertheless, the proportion of each hospital’s investment in medical quality and patient safety relative to its total revenue varied greatly. The number of reports submitted to the Taiwan patient safety reporting system and other hospital-wide reporting systems also differed greatly among hospitals, possibly due to differences in the patient safety notification categories and procedures prescribed by each institution. These aspects may require clearer definition in the future. The medical center accreditation results demonstrated continued improvement in each hospital’s scores, with the differences gradually narrowing. In total, 13 out of the 14 hospitals that applied for medical center accreditation achieved scores that met the accreditation standards, demonstrating a certain level of excellence, particularly in implementing Mission Three’s standards for medical quality and patient safety and achieving good performance. In the future, hospitals should not only implement the medical quality and patient safety goals stipulated by the Ministry of Health and Welfare but also conduct root cause analyses following Taiwan patient safety reporting system in accordance with the Ministry of Health and Welfare’s ""Root Cause Analyses Operational Procedures for Patient Safety Incidents."" Hospitals should identify the root causes of major health and safety incidents or process execution failures and propose specific improvement measures to prevent the recurrence of hazardous incidents.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
針對腦神經科醫護人員早期安寧緩和療護線上課程之效益 潛伏結核感染診斷與治療簡介 外部認證對於創傷性腦損傷照護團隊之影響 醫策會國家品質獎卓越中心:風濕免疫中心品質提升與成果分享 臺北榮總傑出醫療團隊之管理與創新策略
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1